Abstract
Maize (Zea mays L.) breeders are concerned about the narrowing of the genetic base of elite germplasm. To reverse this trend, elite germplasm from other geographic regions can be introgressed, but due to lack of adaptation it is difficult to assess their breeding potential in the targeted environment. The objectives of this study were to (1) investigate the relationship between European and US maize germplasm, (2) examine the suitability of different mega-environments and measures of performance to assess the breeding potential of exotics, and (3) study the relationship of genetic distance with mid-parent heterosis (MPH). Eight European inbreds from the Dent and Flint heterotic groups, 11 US inbreds belonging to Stiff Stalk (SS), non-Stiff Stalk (NSS), and CIMMYT Pool 41, and their 88 factorial crosses in F1 and F2 generations were evaluated for grain yield and dry matter concentration. The experiments were conducted in three mega-environments: Central Europe (target mega-environment), US Cornbelt (mega-environment where donor lines were developed), and Southeast Europe (an intermediate mega-environment). The inbreds were also fingerprinted with 266 SSR markers. Suitable criteria to identify promising exotic germplasm were F1 hybrid performance in the targeted mega-environment and F1 and parental performance in the intermediate mega-environment. Marker-based genetic distances reflected relatedness among the inbreds, but showed no association with MPH. Based on genetic distance, MPH, and F1 performance, we suggest to introgress SS germplasm into European Dents and NSS into European Flints, in order to exploit the specific adaptation of European flint germplasm and the excellent combining ability of US germplasm in European maize breeding programs.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cardy BJ, Kannenberg LW (1982) Allozymic variability among maize inbred lines and hybrids: applications for cultivar identification. Crop Sci 22:1016–1020
Charcosset A, Esioux L (1994) The effect of population structure on the relationship between heterosis and heterozygosity at marker loci. Theor Appl Genet 89:336–345
Charcosset A, Lefort-Buson M, Gallais A (1991) Relationship between heterosis and heterozygosity at marker loci: a theoretical computation. Theor Appl Genet 81:571–575
CIMMYT (1988) CIM004DYT report on maize improvement 1982–1983. Mexico
Cochran WG, Cox GM (1957) Experimental designs, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York
Cress CE (1966) Heterosis of the hybrid related to gene frequency differences between two populations. Genetics 53:269–274
Crow JF, Kimura M (1970) An introduction to population genetics theory. Burgess, Minneapolis
Duvick DN, Smith JSC, Cooper M (2004) Long-term selection in a commercial hybrid maize breeding program. Plant Breed Rev 24:109–151
Edwards JW, Lamkey KR (2002) Quantitative genetics of inbreeding in a synthetic maize population. Crop Sci 42:1094–1104
Falconer DS, Mackay TFC (1996) Introduction to quantitative genetics, 4th edn. Longman, London
Goodman MM, Moreno J, Castillo F, Holley RN, Carson ML (2000) Using tropical maize germplasm for temperate breeding. Maydica 45:221–234
Gower JC (1966) Some distance properties of latent root and vector methods used in multivariate analysis. Biometrika 53:325–338
Hallauer AR, Wright AD (1995) Registration of B101 maize germplasm. Crop Sci 35:1238–1239
Hallauer AR, Lamkey KR, Russell WA, White PF (1994) Registration of B97 and B98, two parental inbred lines of maize. Crop Sci 34:318–319
Hallauer AR, Lamkey KR, Russell WA, White PF (1995) Registration of B99 and B100 inbred lines of maize. Crop Sci 35:1714–1715
Hallauer AR, Lamkey KR, White PF (1997) Registration of five inbred lines of maize: B102, B103, B104, B105, and B106. Crop Sci 37:1405–1406
Hallauer AR, Lamkey KR, White PF (1998) Registration of B107, B108, and B109 inbred lines of maize. Crop Sci 38:1731
Lynch M, Walsh B (1997) Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits. Sinauer Assoc, Sunderland
Maurer HP, Melchinger AE, Frisch M (2008) Population genetic simulation and data analysis with Plabsoft. Euphytica 161:133–139
Melchinger AE (1999) Genetic diversity and heterosis. In: Coors JG, Pandey S (eds) The genetics and exploitation of heterosis in crops. CSSA, Madison, pp 99–118
Messmer MM, Melchinger AE, Boppenmaier J, Brunklaus-Jung E, Herrmann RG (1992) Relationships among early European maize inbreds: I. Genetic diversity among flint and dent lines revealed by RFLPs. Crop Sci 32:1301–1309
Moll RH, Lonnquist JH, Fortuna JV, Johnson EC (1965) The relation of heterosis and genetic divergence in maize. Genetics 52:139–144
Moreno-Gonzalez J, Ramos-Gourcy F, Losada E (1997) Breeding potential of European flint and earliness-selected US Corn Belt dent maize populations. Crop Sci 37:1475–1481
Mumm RH, Dudley JW (1994) A classification of 148 U.S. maize inbreds: I. Cluster analysis based on RFLPs. Crop Sci 34:842–851
Olson RA, Sander DH (1988) Corn production. In: Sprague GF, Dudley JW (eds) Corn and corn improvement. ASA, CSSA, SSSA, Madison, pp 639–686
Reif JC, Melchinger AE, Xia XC, Warburton ML, Hoisington DA, Vasal SK, Srinivasan G, Bohn M, Frisch M (2003) Genetic distance based on simple sequence repeats and heterosis in tropical maize populations. Crop Sci 43:1275–1282
Ron Parra J, Hallauer AR (1997) Utilization of exotic maize germplasm. Plant Breed Rev 14:165–187
SAS Institute (1999) The SAS system for windows. Release 8.02. SAS Institute, Cary
Schrag TA, Möhring J, Maurer HP, Dhillon BS, Melchinger AE, Piepho H-P, Kusterer B, Frisch M (2009) Hybrid performance prediction in maize using molecular markers and combined analyses of hybrids and parental lines (in preparation)
Šimić D, Presterl T, Seitz T, Geiger HH (2003) Comparing methods for integrating exotic germplasm into European forage maize breeding programs. Crop Sci 43:1952–1959
Smith JSC, Goodman MM, Stuber CW (1985) Genetic variability within U.S. maize germplasm. II. Widely-used inbred lines 1970 to 1979. Crop Sci 25:681–685
Smith JSC, Duvick DN, Smith OS, Cooper M, Feng L (2004) Changes in pedigree backgrounds of Pioneer brand maize hybrids widely grown from 1930 to 1999. Crop Sci 44:1935–1946
Snedecor GW, Cochran WG (1980) Statistical methods. The Iowa State University Press, Ames
Soengas P, Ordás B, Malvar RA, Revilla P, Ordás A (2003) Heterotic patterns among flint maize populations. Crop Sci 43:844–849
Wright S (1978) Evolution and genetics of populations, variability within and among natural populations, vol 4. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, p 91
Acknowledgments
This project was supported by funds from the German Research Foundation DFG in the framework program “Heterosis in Plants”, Research Grants RE2254/1-2. The authors thank Südwestdeutsche Saatzucht GmbH & Co KG for performing the field trials in Southeast Europe. The skilled technical assistance of the staff at the Maize Breeding Research Station, Eckartsweier in conducting field trials is gratefully acknowledged.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by B. Godshalk.
Contribution to the special issue “Heterosis in Plants”.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Reif, J.C., Fischer, S., Schrag, T.A. et al. Broadening the genetic base of European maize heterotic pools with US Cornbelt germplasm using field and molecular marker data. Theor Appl Genet 120, 301–310 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-009-1055-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-009-1055-9