Skip to main content
Log in

A cytomolecular approach to assess the potential of gene transfer from a crop (Triticum turgidum L.) to a wild relative (Aegilops geniculata Roth.)

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Theoretical and Applied Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

When a crop hybridizes with a wild relative, the potential for stable transmission to the wild of any crop gene is directly related to the frequency of crop–wild homoeologous pairing for the chromosomal region where it is located within the crop genome. Pairing pattern at metaphase I (MI) has been examined in durum wheat × Aegilops geniculata interspecific hybrids (2n=4x=ABUgMg) by means of a genomic in-situ hybridization procedure that resulted in simultaneous discrimination of A, B and wild genomes. The level of MI pairing in the hybrids varied greatly depending on the crop genotype. However, their pattern of homoeologous association was very similar, with a frequency of wheat–wild association close to 60% in all genotype combinations. A–wild represented 80–85% of wheat–wild associations which supports that, on average, A genome sequences are much more likely to be transferred to this wild relative following interspecific hybridization and backcrossing. Combination of genomic DNA probes and the ribosomal pTa71 probe has allowed to determine the MI pairing behaviour of the major NOR-bearing chromosomes in these hybrids (1B, 6B, 1Ug and 5Ug), in addition to wheat chromosome 4A which could be identified with the sole use of genomic probes. The MI pairing pattern of the wild chromosome arms individually examined has confirmed a higher chance of gene escape from the wheat A genome. However, a wide variation regarding the amount of wheat–wild MI pairing among the specific wheat chromosome regions under analysis suggests that the study should be extended to other homoeologous groups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Badaeva ED, Amosova AV, Samatadze TE, Zoshchuk SA, Shostak NG, Chikida NN, Zelenin AV, Raupp WJ, Friebe B, Gill BS (2004) Genome differentiation in Aegilops. 4. Evolution of the U-genome cluster. Plant Syst Evol 246:45–76

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Benavente E, Orellana J, Fernandez-Calvin B (1998) Comparative analysis of the meiotic effects of wheat ph1b and ph2b mutations in wheat × rye hybrids. Theor Appl Genet 96:1200–1204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benavente E, Alix K, Dusautoir JC, Orellana J, David JL (2001) Early evolution of the chromosomal structure of Triticum turgidumAegilops ovata amphiploids carrying and lacking the Ph1 gene. Theor Appl Genet 103:1123–1128

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cai X, Jones S (1997) Direct evidence for high level of autosyndetic pairing in hybrids of Thinopyrum intermedium and Th. ponticum with Triticum aestivum. Theor Appl Genet 95:568–572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Q, Conner RL, Laroche A, Ahmad F (2001) Molecular cytogenetic evidence for a high level of chromosome pairing among different genomes in Triticum aestivumThinopyrum intermedium hybrids. Theor Appl Genet 102:847–852

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cuadrado A, Vitellozzi F, Jouve N, Ceoloni C (1997) Fluorescence in situ hybridization with multiple repeated DNA probes applied to the analysis of wheat–rye chromosome pairing. Theor Appl Genet 94:347–355

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dale PJ, Clarke B, Fontes EM (2002) Potential for the environmental impact of transgenic crops. Nat Biotechnol 20:567–574

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • David JL, Benavente E, Bres-Patry C, Dusautoir JC, Echaide M (2004) Are neopolyploids a likely route for a transgene walk to the wild? The Aegilops ovata × Triticum turgidum durum case. Biol J Linn Soc 82:503–510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellstrand NC, Prentice HC, Hancock JF (1999) Gene flow and introgression from domesticated plants into their wild relatives. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 30:539–563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ESF (2004) Programme ‘assessment of the impacts of genetically modified plants (AIGM)’ of European Science Foundation (1999–2004). http://www.esf.org/esf_article.php?language=0&activity=1&domain=3&article=49&page=97

  • FAO (2002) Gene flow from GM to non-GM populations in the crop, forestry, animal and fishery sectors. Electronic forum on biotechnology in food and agriculture, 7th conference (May 31–July 6, 2002). Summary in http://www.fao.org/biotech/logs/C7/summary.htm

  • Fernandez-Calvin B, Orellana J (1992) Relationship between pairing frequencies and genome affinity estimations in Aegilops ovata × Triticum aestivum hybrid plants. Heredity 68:165–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerlach WL, Bedbrook JR (1979) Cloning and characterization of ribosomal-RNA genes from wheat and barley. Nucleic Acids Res 7:1869–1885

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Guadagnuolo R, SavovaBianchi D, Felber F (2001) Gene flow from wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) to jointed goatgrass (Aegilops cylindrica Host.), as revealed by RAPD and microsatellite markers. Theor Appl Genet 103:1–8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jauhar PP, Riera-Lizarazu O, Dewey WG, Gill BS, Crane CF, Bennett JH (1991) Chromosome pairing relationships among the A, B, and D genomes of bread wheat. Theor Appl Genet 82:441–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jauhar PP, Almouslem AB, Peterson TS, Joppa LR (1999) Inter- and intragenomic chromosome pairing in haploids of durum wheat. J Hered 90:437–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jauhar PP, Dogramaci M, Peterson TS (2004) Synthesis and cytological characterization of trigeneric hybrids of durum wheat with and without Ph1. Genome 47:1173–1181

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jones HD (2005) Wheat transformation: current technology and applications to grain development and composition. J Cereal Sci 41:137–147

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas H, Jahier J (1988) Phylogenetic relationships in some diploid species of Triticineae: cytogenetic analysis of interspecific hybrids. Theor Appl Genet 75:498–502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lukaszewski AJ, Lapinski B, Rybka K (2005) Limitations of in situ hybridization with total genomic DNA in routine screening for alien introgressions in wheat. Cytogenet Genome Res 109:373–377

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maestra B, Naranjo T (2000) Genome evolution in Triticeae. In: Olmo E, Redi CA (eds) Chromosomes today, vol 13. Birkhäuser Verlag, Switzerland, pp 155–167

  • Martinez M, Cuadrado C, Laurie DA, Romero C (2005) Synaptic behaviour of hexaploid wheat haploids with different effectiveness of the diploidizing mechanism. Cytogenet Genome Res 109:210–214

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mukai Y, Endo TR, Gill BS (1991) Physical mapping of the 18S.26S rRNA multigene family in common wheat: identification of a new locus. Chromosoma 100:71–78

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Naranjo T (1990) Chromosome structure of durum wheat. Theor Appl Genet 79:397–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naranjo T, Fernandez-Rueda P (1996) Pairing and recombination between individual chromosomes of wheat and rye in hybrids carrying the ph1b mutation. Theor Appl Genet 93:242–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naranjo T, Roca A, Goicoechea PG, Giraldez R (1987) Arm homoeology of wheat and rye chromosomes. Genome 29:873–882

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozkan H, Feldman M (2001) Genotypic variation in tetraploid wheat affecting homoeologous pairing in hybrids with Aegilops peregrina. Genome 44:1000–1006

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sahrawat AK, Becker D, Lutticke S, Lorz H (2003) Genetic improvement of wheat via alien gene transfer, an assessment. Plant Sci 165:1147–1168

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez-Moran E, Benavente E, Orellana J (1999) Simultaneous identification of A, B, D and R genomes by genomic in situ hybridization in wheat–rye derivatives. Heredity 83:249–252

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez-Moran E, Benavente E, Orellana J (2001) Analysis of karyotypic stability of homoeologous-pairing (ph) mutants in allopolyploid wheats. Chromosoma 110:371–377

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • van Slageren MW (1994) Wild wheats: a monograph of Aegilops L. and Amblyopyrum (Jaub and Spach) Eig (Poaceae). Agricultural University of Wageningen-ICARDA

  • Tomiuk J, Hauser TP, BaggerJorgensen R (2000) A- or C-chromosomes, does it matter for the transfer of transgenes from Brassica napus. Theor Appl Genet 100:750–754

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang ZN, Hang A, Hansen J, Burton C, Mallory-Smith CA, Zemetra RS (2000) Visualization of A- and B-genome chromosomes in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) × jointed goatgrass (Aegilops cylindrica Host) backcross progenies. Genome 43:1038–1044

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang H, Jia J, Gale MD, Devos KM (1998) Relationships between the chromosomes of Aegilops umbellulata and wheat. Theor Appl Genet 96:69–75

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are indebted to Dr. Jacques David for having provided access to the wild hybrid meiosis. We thank also Jean-Claude Dusautoir for his invaluable help in the production and growing of some of the interspecific hybrids. This study has been funded by grant AGL2002-1593 from the Dirección General de Investigación of Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia (formerly Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnología) of Spain.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elena Benavente.

Additional information

Communicated by B. Friebe

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cifuentes, M., Blein, M. & Benavente, E. A cytomolecular approach to assess the potential of gene transfer from a crop (Triticum turgidum L.) to a wild relative (Aegilops geniculata Roth.). Theor Appl Genet 112, 657–664 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-005-0168-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-005-0168-z

Keywords

Navigation