Skip to main content
Log in

Hoch intensiver fokussierter transrektaler Ultraschall (rHIFU) zur lokalen Therapie des Prostatakarzinoms

Update 2009

Transrectal high-intensity focused ultrasound for local treatment of prostate cancer

2009 Update

  • Leitthema
  • Published:
Der Urologe Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Gepulster fokussierter, robotischer hoch intensiver Ultraschall (rHIFU) ist v. a. aufgrund seines nicht invasiven Therapiecharakters interessant. In der urologischen Onkologie findet rHIFU als therapeutische Maßnahme zur transrektalen Behandlung des Prostatakarzinoms Anwendung. Während die perkutane Therapie des Nierenkarzinoms derzeit noch in experimentell klinischen Studien geprüft wird, ist die transrektale Therapie mit rHIFU bereits in über 230 urologischen Abteilungen weltweit als Therapieoption des Prostatakarzinoms etabliert. Die Ergebnisse der Therapie des Prostatakarzinoms mit rHIFU basieren in der Hauptsache auf Patientenserien unterschiedlicher klinischer Studien. In den USA wurde vor 2 Jahren eine prospektive Multicenterstudie für die klinische Zulassung (FDA Approval) begonnen (Vergleich HIFU/Kryotherapie). Die neuesten Publikationen sehen in der transrektalen Anwendung von rHIFU eine Erfolg versprechende zusätzliche Therapieoption beim lokalen Prostatakarzinom, bei lokalen Rezidiven jedweder erfolgloser Primärtherapien, sowie als palliativ adjuvante Zusatztherapie des systemischen Prostatakarzinoms.

Abstract

Pulsed robotic high-intensity focused ultrasound (rHIFU) is an interesting therapeutic option mainly due to its noninvasive character. In urologic oncology, rHIFU is used for the transrectal therapy of prostate cancer. While percutaneous therapy of renal cancer using rHIFU is still being tested in experimental studies, transrectal therapy with rHIFU for prostate cancer is already established in more than 230 urologic departments worldwide. The results of prostate cancer therapy with rHIFU are mainly based on different clinical studies. In 2007 a clinical study comparing rHIFU and cryotherapy for the treatment of prostate cancer was initiated in the USA in order to gain clinical approval by the FDA. The most recent publications concluded that the use of rHIFU is an effective standard treatment for prostate cancer with a broad range of indications in all tumor stages: (1) in the primary treatment of local prostate cancer, (2) in patients with local recurrence after failure of any primary treatment, and (3) as an adjuvant therapy in the palliation of systemic prostate cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3

Literatur

  1. Adams JB, Moore RG, Anderson JA et al (1996) High-intensity focused ultrasound ablation of rabbit kidney tumors. J Endourol 10: 71–75

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Beerlage HP, van Leendersa GJLH, Oosterhofa GON. et al (1999) High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) followed after one to two weeks by radical retropubic prostatectomy: results of a prospective study. Prostate 39: 41–46

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Blana A, Murat FJ, Walter B et al (2008) First analysis of the long-term results with transrectal HIFU in patients with localised prostate cancer. Eur Urol 53(6): 1194–2001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chapelon JY, Margonari J, Vernier F et al (1992) In vivo effects of highintensity ultrasound on prostatic adenocarcinoma dunning R3327. Cancer Res 52: 6353–6357

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Chapelon JY, Margonari J, Theillere Y et al (1992) Effects of high-energy focused ultrasound on kidney tissue in the rat and the dog. Eur Urol 22: 147–152

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Chapelon JY, Chapelon, Cathignol D, Cain C et al (2000) New piezoelectric transducers for therapeutic ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol 26: 153–159

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Chaussy CG, Thüroff S (2000) High-intensive focused ultrasound in localized prostate cancer. J Endourol 14: 293–299

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Chaussy C, Thüroff S (2003) The status of high-intensity focused ultrasound in the treatment of localized prostate cancer and the impact of a combined resection. Curr Urol Rep 4: 248–252

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Chaussy C, Thürof S, Rebillard X et al (2005) Technology insight: high-intensity focused ultrasound for urologic cancers. Nat Clin Pract 4: 191–198

    Google Scholar 

  10. Chaussy C, Thuroff S, Bergsdorf T et al (2006) Local recurrence of prostate cancer after curative therapy. HIFU (Ablatherm) as a treatment option. Urologe A 45(10): 1271–1275

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Chaussy C, Thüroff S (2009) The use of high-intensity focused ultrasound in prostate cancer. In: Ukimura O, Gill IS (eds) Contemporary Interventional Ultrasonsography in Urology. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 63–74

  12. Chavrier F, Chapelon JY, Gelet A et al (2000) Modeling of high intensity focused ultrasound-induced lesions in the presence of cavitation bubbles. J Acoust Soc Am 108: 432–440

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Damianou C (2003) In vitro and in vivo ablation of porcine renal tissues using high-intensity focused ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol 29: 1321–1330

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Foster RS, Bihrle R, Sanghvi N et al (1993) Production of prostatic lesions in canines using transrectally administered highintensity focused ultrasound. Eur Urol 23: 330–336

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Fry FJ, Johnson LK (1978) Tumour irradiation with intense ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol 4:337–341

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Gelet A, Chapelon JY, Margonari J et al (1993) Prostatic tissue destruction by high-intensity focused ultrasound: experimentation on canine prostate. J Endourol 7: 249–253

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Gelet A, Chapelon J (2004) Local recurrence of prostate cancer after external beam radiotherapy: early experience of salvage therapy using high-intensity focused ultrasonography. J Urol 63: 625–629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hynynen K, Freund WR, Cline HE et al (1996) A clinical, noninvasive, MR imaging-monitored ultrasound surgery method. Radiographics 16: 185–195

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kishi M (1975) Experimental studies of effects of intense ultrasound on implantable murine glioma. In: Kazmer E et al (eds) Proceedings of the 2nd European Congress on Ultrasonics in Medicine. Excerpta Medica, Amsterdam, pp 28–33

  20. Köhrmann KU, Michel MS, Gaa J et al (2002) High intensity focused ultrasound as noninvasive therapy for multilocal renal cell carcinoma: case study and review of the literature. J Urol 167: 2397–2403

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lynn JG, Putman TJ (1944) Histological and cerebral lesions produced by focused ultrasound. Am J Pathol 20: 637–649

    Google Scholar 

  22. Moore WE, Lopez RM, Matthews DE et al (1989) Evaluation of high-intensity therapeutic ultrasound irradiation in the treatment of experimental hepatoma. J Pediatr Surg 24: 30–33

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Poissonnier L, Gelet A, Chapelon JY et al (2003) Results of transrectal focused ultrasound for the treatment of localized prostate cancer (120 patients with PSA<or +10 ng/ml). Prog Urol 13: 60–72

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Rouviere O, Lyonnet D, Raudrant A et al (2001) MRI appearance of prostate following transrectal HIFU ablation of localized cancer. Eur Urol 40: 265–274

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Thüroff S, Chaussy C (2000) High-intensity focused ultrasound: complications and adverse events. Mol Urol 4: 183–187

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Thüroff S, Chaussy C, Vallancien G et al (2003) High-intensity focused ultrasound and localized prostate cancer: efficacy results from the European multicentric study. J Endourol 17: 673–677

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Thüroff S, Chaussy C (2007) High intensity focused pulsed ultrasound (HIFU) for local ablation of prostate carcinoma. Urologe A 46(9): 1092

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Thüroff S, Chaussy C (2008) HIFU in urological oncology. Urologe A 47(4): 431–440

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Tsakiris P, Thuroff S, de la Rosette J et al (2008) Transrectal High-intensity focused Ultrasound devices: A critical appraisal of the available evidence. J Endourol 22(2): 221–229

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Uchida T, Sanghvi NT, Gardner TA et al (2002) Transrectal high-intensity focused ultrasound for treatment of patients with stage T1b-2n0m0 localized prostate cancer: a preliminary report. Urology A 59: 394–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Vallancien G, Chartier KE, Harouni M et al (1991) Focused extracorporeal pyrotherapy: experimental results. Eur Urol 20: 211–219

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Wu T, Felmlee JP, Greenleaf JF et al (2001) Assessment of thermal tissue ablation with MR elastography. Magn Reson Med 45: 80–87

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Interessenkonflikt

Der korrespondierende Autor weist auf folgende Beziehung/en hin: Principal Investigator seit 1996. HIFU Studienbetreiber. Trotz des möglichen Interessenkonflikts ist der Beitrag unabhängig und produktneutral.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C.G. Chaussy FRCS.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chaussy, C., Thüroff, S. Hoch intensiver fokussierter transrektaler Ultraschall (rHIFU) zur lokalen Therapie des Prostatakarzinoms. Urologe 48, 710–718 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00120-009-1981-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00120-009-1981-9

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation