Abstract
Attention is described as the ability to process selectively one aspect of the environment over others. In this study, we characterized horses’ spontaneous attention by designing a novel visual attention test (VAT) that is easy to apply in the animal’s home environment. The test was repeated over three consecutive days and repeated again 6 months later in order to assess inter-individual variations and intra-individual stability. Different patterns of attention have been revealed: ‘overall’ attention when the horse merely gazed at the stimulus and ‘fixed’ attention characterized by fixity and orientation of at least the visual and auditory organs towards the stimulus. The individual attention characteristics remained consistent over time (after 6 months, Spearman correlation test, P < 0.05). The validity of this novel test as a predictor of individual attentional skills was assessed by comparing the results, for the same horses, with those obtained in both a ‘classical’ experimental attention test the ‘five-choice serial reaction time task’ (5-CSRTT) and a work situation (lunge working context). Our results revealed that (i) individual variations remained consistent across tests and (ii) the VAT attention measures were not only predictive of attentional skills but also of learning abilities. Differences appeared however between the first day of testing and the following test days: attention structure on the second day was predictive of learning abilities, attention performances in the 5-CSRRT and at work. The VAT appears as a promising easy-to-use tool to assess animals’ attention characteristics and the impact of different factors of variation on attention.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alkam T, Hiramatsu M, Mamiya T, Aoyama Y, Nitta A, Yamada K, Kim H-C, Nabeshima T (2011) Evaluation of object-based attention in mice. Behav Brain Res 220:185–193. doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2011.01.039
Altmann J (1974) Observational study of behavior: sampling methods. Behaviour 49:227–266. doi:10.1163/156853974X00534
Altun M, Bergman E, Edström E, Johnson H, Ulfhake B (2007) Behavioral impairments of the aging rat. Physiol Behav 92:911–923. doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2007.06.017
Austin NP, Rogers PLJ (2007) Asymmetry of flight and escape turning responses in horses. Laterality 12:464–474. doi:10.1080/13576500701495307
Austin NP, Rogers LJ (2012) Limb preferences and lateralization of aggression, reactivity and vigilance in feral horses, Equus caballus. Anim Behav 83:239–247. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.10.033
Baragli P, Mariti C, Petri L, De Giorgio F, Sighieri C (2011) Does attention make the difference? Horses’ response to human stimulus after 2 different training strategies. J Vet Behav Clin Appl Res 6:31–38. doi:10.1016/j.jveb.2010.08.020
Baragli P, Padalino B, Telatin A (2015) The role of associative and non-associative learning in the training of horses and implications for the welfare (a review). Ann Ist Super Sanita 51:40–51. doi:10.4415/ANN_15_01_08
Bari A, Dalley JW, Robbins TW (2008) The application of the 5-choice serial reaction time task for the assessment of visual attentional processes and impulse control in rats. Nat Protoc 3:759–767. doi:10.1038/nprot.2008.41
Barlow GW (1968) Ethological units of behaviour. In: Ingle D (ed) The central nervous system and fish behaviour. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 217–232
Beauchamp G (2010) A comparative analysis of vigilance in birds. Evol Ecol 24:1267–1276. doi:10.1007/s10682-010-9358-5
Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y (2000) On the adaptive control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing with independent statistics. J Educ Behav Stat 25:60–83. doi:10.3102/10769986025001060
Blackmore TL, Foster TM, Sumpter CE, Temple W (2008) An investigation of colour discrimination with horses (Equus caballus). Behav Process 78:387–396. doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2008.02.003
Blois-Heulin C (1999) Variability in social visual attention in the red-capped Mangabey (Cercocebus torquatus torquatus) and the grey-cheeked Mangabey (Cercocebus albigena albigena). Folia Primatol (Basel) 70:264–268. doi:10.1159/000021705
Buckwalter JG, Stanczyk FZ, McCleary CA, Bluestein BW, Buckwalter DK, Rankin KP, Chang L, Goodwin TM (1999) Pregnancy, the postpartum, and steroid hormones: effects on cognition and mood. Psychoneuroendocrinology 24:69–84
Burn CC, Dennison TL, Whay HR (2010) Relationships between behaviour and health in working horses, donkeys, and mules in developing countries. Appl Anim Behav Sci 126:109–118. doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2010.06.007
Bushnell PJ (1998) Behavioral approaches to the assessment of attention in animals. Psychopharmacology 138:231–259. doi:10.1007/s002130050668
Caporello Bluvas E, Gentner TQ (2013) Attention to natural auditory signals. Hear Res 305:10–18. doi:10.1016/j.heares.2013.08.007
Carli M, Robbins TW, Evenden JL, Everitt BJ (1983) Effects of lesions to ascending noradrenergic neurones on performance of a 5-choice serial reaction task in rats; implications for theories of dorsal noradrenergic bundle function based on selective attention and arousal. Behav Brain Res 9:361–380
Chelazzi L, Perlato A, Santandrea E, Della Libera C (2013) Rewards teach visual selective attention. Vision Res Visual Attention II 85:58–72. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2012.12.005
Chica AB, Bartolomeo P, Lupiáñez J (2013) Two cognitive and neural systems for endogenous and exogenous spatial attention. Behav Brain Res 237:107–123. doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2012.09.027
Cohen LB (1972) Attention-getting and attention-holding processes of infant visual preferences. Child Dev 43:869–879. doi:10.2307/1127638
Cowan N (1997) Attention and memory. Oxford University Press, New York
De Boyer Des Roches A, Richard-Yris M-A, Henry S, Ezzaouïa M, Hausberger M (2008) Laterality and emotions: visual laterality in the domestic horse (Equus caballus) differs with objects’ emotional value. Physiol Behav 94:487–490. doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2008.03.002
Dufour V, Pelé M, M EH, Thierry B (2007) Chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) anticipation of food return: coping with waiting time in an exchange task. J Comp Psychol 121:145–155. doi:10.1037/0735-7036.121.2.145
Dukas R (2004) Causes and consequences of limited attention. Brain Behav Evol 63:197–210. doi:10.1159/000076781
Evinger C (1995) A brain stem reflex in the blink of an eye. Physiology 10:147–153
Fureix C, Jego P, Henry S, Lansade L, Hausberger M (2012) Towards an ethological animal model of depression? A study on horses. PLoS One 7:e39280. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0039280
George I, Richard J-P, Cousillas H, Hausberger M (2011) No need to talk, I know you: familiarity influences early multisensory integration in a songbird’s brain. Front Behav Neurosci 4:193. doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2010.00193
de Groot RHM, Adam JJ, Hornstra G (2003) Selective attention deficits during human pregnancy. Neurosci Lett 340:21–24
Ha RR, Ha JC (2011) Integrative statistics for the social and behavioral sciences. Sage, Thousand Oaks
Hanggi E b (2005) Thinking horse: cognition and perception reviewed. Proc Annu Conv
Hanggi EB, Ingersoll JF (2009) Stimulus discrimination by horses under scotopic conditions. Behav Process 82:45–50. doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2009.04.009
Harman AM, Moore S, Hoskins R, Keller P (1999) Horse vision and an explanation for the visual behaviour originally explained by the ‘ramp retina’. Equine Vet J 31:384–390. doi:10.1111/j.2042-3306.1999.tb03837.x
Hausberger M, Bruderer C, Le Scolan N, Pierre J-S (2004) Interplay between environmental and genetic factors in temperament/personality traits in horses (Equus caballus). J Comp Psychol Wash DC 1983(118):434–446. doi:10.1037/0735-7036.118.4.434
Hausberger M, Gautier E, Müller C, Jego P (2007) Lower learning abilities in stereotypic horses. Appl Anim Behav Sci 107:299–306. doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2006.10.003
Hebel R (1976) Distribution of retinal ganglion cells in five mammalian species (pig, sheep, ox, horse, dog). Anat Embryol (Berl) 150:45–51. doi:10.1007/BF00346285
Henry S, Fureix C, Rowberry R, Bateson M, Hausberger M (2017) Do horses with poor welfare show ‘pessimistic’ cognitive biases? Sci Nat 104:8. doi:10.1007/s00114-016-1429-1
Hillemann F, Bugnyar T, Kotrschal K, Wascher CAF (2014) Waiting for better, not for more: corvids respond to quality in two delay maintenance tasks. Anim Behav 90:1–10. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2014.01.007
Horn L, Range F, Huber L (2013) Dogs’ attention towards humans depends on their relationship, not only on social familiarity. Anim Cogn 16:435–443. doi:10.1007/s10071-012-0584-9
Hughes A (1977) The topography of vision in mammals of contrasting life style: comparative optics and retinal organisation. In: Crescitelli F (ed) The visual system in vertebrates. Handbook of sensory physiology. Springer, Berlin, pp 613–756
Kaminski J, Riedel J, Call J, Tomasello M (2005) Domestic goats, Capra hircus, follow gaze direction and use social cues in an object choice task. Anim Behav 69:11–18. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2004.05.008
Kienapfel K, Link Y, König V, Borstel U (2014) Prevalence of different head-neck positions in horses shown at dressage competitions and their relation to conflict behaviour and performance marks. PLoS One 9:e103140. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0103140
Kiley-Worthington M (1976) The tail movements of ungulates, canids and felids with particular references to their causation and function as displays. doi:10.1163/156853976x00307
König von Borstel U, Pasing S, Gauly M (2011) Towards a more objective assessment of equine personality using behavioural and physiological observations from performance test training. Appl Anim Behav Sci 135:277–285. doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2011.10.007
Lampe J, Andre J (2012) Cross-modal recognition of human individuals in domestic horses (Equus caballus). Anim Cogn 15:623–630. doi:10.1007/s10071-012-0490-1
Larose C, Richard-Yris M-A, Hausberger M, Rogers LJ (2006) Laterality of horses associated with emotionality in novel situations. Laterality 11:355–367. doi:10.1080/13576500600624221
Le Scolan N, Hausberger M, Wolff A (1997) Stability over situations in temperamental traits of horses as revealed by experimental and scoring approaches. Behav Process 41:257–266. doi:10.1016/S0376-6357(97)00052-1
Lemasson A, Boutin A, Boivin S, Blois-Heulin C, Hausberger M (2009) Horse (Equus caballus) whinnies: a source of social information. Anim Cogn 12:693–704. doi:10.1007/s10071-009-0229-9
Lesimple C, Sankey C, Richard MA, Hausberger M (2012) Do horses expect humans to solve their problems? Front Psychol 3. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00306
Maquestiaux F (2013) Psychologie de l’attention. De Boeck, Bruxelles
Parker M, McBride SD, Redhead ES, Goodwin D (2009) Differential place and response learning in horses displaying an oral stereotypy. Behav Brain Res 200:100–105. doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2008.12.033
Pelé M, Dufour V, Micheletta J, Thierry B (2010) Long-tailed macaques display unexpected waiting abilities in exchange tasks. Anim Cogn 13:263–271. doi:10.1007/s10071-009-0264-6
Posner MI (2012) Cognitive neuroscience of attention. Guilford, New York
Posner MI, Snyder CR, Davidson BJ (1980) Attention and the detection of signals. J Exp Psychol Gen 109:160–174. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.109.2.160
Range F, Huber L (2007) Attention in common marmosets: implications for social-learning experiments. Anim Behav 73:1033–1041. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.07.015
Range F, Horn L, Bugnyar T, Gajdon GK, Huber L (2009) Social attention in keas, dogs, and human children. Anim Cogn 12:181–192. doi:10.1007/s10071-008-0181-0
Rapin V, Poncet PA, Burger D, Mermod C, Hausberger M, Richard M-A (2007) Mesure de la durée d’attention chez le cheval. Schweiz Arch Für Tierheilkd 149:77–83. doi:10.1024/0036-7281.149.2.77
Rivera E, Benjamin S, Nielsen B, Shelle J, Zanella AJ (2002) Behavioral and physiological responses of horses to initial training: the comparison between pastured versus stalled horses. Appl Anim Behav Sci 78:235–252. doi:10.1016/S0168-1591(02)00091-6
Robbins T (2002) The 5-choice serial reaction time task: behavioural pharmacology and functional neurochemistry. Psychopharmacology 163:362–380. doi:10.1007/s00213-002-1154-7
Rochais C, Henry S, Sankey C, Nassur F, Góracka-Bruzda A, Hausberger M (2014) Visual attention, an indicator of human-animal relationships? A study of domestic horses (Equus caballus). Front Psychol 5:108. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00108
Rochais C, Fureix C, Lesimple C, Hausberger M (2016a) Lower attention to daily environment: a novel cue for detecting chronic horses’ back pain? Sci Rep 6:20117. doi:10.1038/srep20117
Rochais C, Henry S, Fureix C, Hausberger M (2016b) Investigating attentional processes in depressive-like domestic horses (Equus caballus). Behav Process 124:93–96. doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2015.12.010
Sankey C, Richard-Yris M-A, Leroy H, Henry S, Hausberger M (2010) Positive interactions lead to lasting positive memories in horses, Equus caballus. Anim Behav 79:869–875. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.12.037
Scheid C, Range F, Bugnyar T (2007) When, what, and whom to watch? Quantifying attention in ravens (Corvus corax) and jackdaws (Corvus monedula). J Comp Psychol 121:380–386. doi:10.1037/0735-7036.121.4.380
Schloegl C, Kotrschal K, Bugnyar T (2008) Do common ravens (Corvus corax) rely on human or conspecific gaze cues to detect hidden food? Anim Cogn 11:231–241. doi:10.1007/s10071-007-0105-4
Siegel S, Castellan NJ (1988) Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. McGraw-Hill, New York
Sohlberg MM, Mateer CA (2001) Improving attention and managing attentional problems. Ann N Y Acad Sci 931:359–375. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2001.tb05790.x
Steckler T, Sauvage M, Holsboer F (2000) Glucocorticoid receptor impairment enhances impulsive responding in transgenic mice performing on a simultaneous visual discrimination task. Eur J Neurosci 12:2559–2569. doi:10.1046/j.1460-9568.2000.00111.x
Vollbrecht PJ, Nobile CW, Chadderdon AM, Jutkiewicz EM, Ferrario CR (2015) Pre-existing differences in motivation for food and sensitivity to cocaine-induced locomotion in obesity-prone rats. Physiol Behav 152(Part A):151–160. doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2015.09.022
Waring GH (2003) Horse behavior. Noyes Publications/William Andrew Pub, Park Ridge
Wathan J, McComb K (2014) The eyes and ears are visual indicators of attention in domestic horses. Curr Biol 24:R677–R679. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2014.06.023
Welner SA, Koty ZC (1993) Amelioration of sensory attention and sensorimotor deficits by chromaffin cell grafts to the cerebral cortex of nucleus basalis magnocellularis lesioned rats. Behav Brain Res 59:73–81. doi:10.1016/0166-4328(93)90153-H
Wilkinson RT (1963) Interaction of noise with knowledge of results and sleep deprivation. J Exp Psychol 66:332–337. doi:10.1037/h0044161
Wolff A, Hausberger M, Le Scolan N (1997) Experimental tests to assess emotionality in horses. Behav Process 40:209–221. doi:10.1016/S0376-6357(97)00784-5
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to the director (Laurence Wimel) and staff of the ‘Station expérimentale des Haras nationaux’, Chamberet, France. We also wish to thank Dr. C. Fureix and Pr. H. Cousillas for their help with the methodology, Dr. A. Cloarec for improving the English and H. Hotte for technical help on the figure. We are grateful to the anonymous reviewers for their very helpful comments. This work was supported by a doctoral grant from the French Research Department (to CR), a grant from the Institut Français du Cheval et de l’Equitation (IFCE) and funding from the ‘Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique’ (CNRS). The funders had no role in the study design, data collection and analyses, decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
All procedures performed in studies involving animals were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institution or practice at which the studies were conducted. This study was approved by the French National Ethics Committee (Animal utilisation protocol number: 33, 12-2013-12). Experiments complied with the current French laws related to animal experimentation and were in accordance to the European directive 2013/118/CEE. The study only involved behavioural observations and non-invasive interactions with horses. Animal husbandry and care were under the management of the staff of the experimental station (SEHN - Chamberet, France). The horses used in this experiment were not research animals.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Communicated by: Sven Thatje
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rochais, C., Sébilleau, M., Houdebine, M. et al. A novel test for evaluating horses’ spontaneous visual attention is predictive of attention in operant learning tasks. Sci Nat 104, 61 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-017-1480-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-017-1480-6