Skip to main content
Log in

The ‘I see you’ prey–predator signal of Apis cerana is innate

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Naturwissenschaften Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An ‘I see you’ (ISY) prey–predator signal can co-evolve when such a signal benefits both prey and predator. The prey benefits if, by producing the signal, the predator is likely to break off an attack. The predator benefits if it is informed by the signal that the prey is aware of its presence and can break off what is likely to be an unsuccessful and potentially costly hunt. Because the signal and response co-evolve in two species, the behaviour underlying an ISY signal is expected to have a strong genetic component and cannot be entirely learned. An example of an ISY signal is the ‘shimmering’ behaviour performed by Asian hive bee workers in the presence of their predator Vespa velutina. To test the prediction that bee–hornet signalling is heritable, we let honey bee workers of two species emerge in an incubator so that they had never been exposed to V. velutina. In Apis cerana, the shimmering response developed 48 h post-emergence, was strong after 72 h and increased further over 2 weeks. In contrast, A. mellifera, which has evolved in the absence of Asian hornets, did not produce the shimmering signal. In control tests, A. cerana workers exposed to a non-threatening butterfly did not respond with the shimmering signal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrol DP (2006) Defensive behaviour of Apis cerana F. against predatory wasps. J Apic Sci 50:39–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergstrom CT, Lachmann M (2001) Alarm calls as costly signals of antipredatory vigilence: the watchful babbler game. Anim Behav 61:535–543

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blumstein DT (2007) Feeling the heat: ground squirrels heat their tails to discourage rattlesnake attack. Proc Nat Acad Sci U S A 104:14177–14178

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Butler CG (1974) The world of the honeybee. Collins, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Caro TM (1986) The functions of stotting in Thompson’s gazelles: some tests of the predictions. Anim Behav 34:663–684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caro TM (1995) Pursuit-deterrence revisited. Trends Ecol Evol 10:500–503

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clark RW (2005) Pursuit-deterrent communication between prey animals and timber rattlesnakes (Crotalus horridus): the response of snakes to harassment displays. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 59:258–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs S, Tautz J (2011) Colony defence and natural enemies. In: Hepburn HR, Radloff SE (eds) Honeybees of Asia. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 369–395

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hasson O (1991) Pursuit-deterrent signals: communication between prey and predator. Trends Ecol Evol 6:325–329

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ken T, Hepburn HR, Radloff SE, Yusheng Y, Yiqiu L, Danyin Z, Neumann P (2005) Heat-balling wasps by honeybees. Naturwissenschaften 92:492–495

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kloft W, Schneider P (1969) Gruppenverteidigungsverhalten bei wildlebenden Bienen (Apis cerana Fabr.) in Afghanistan. Naturwissenschaften 56:219

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Koeniger N, Fuchs S (1975) Zur Kolonieverteidigung der asiatiche Honigbienen. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie 37:99–106

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oldroyd BP, Wongsiri S (2006) Asian honey bees. Biology, conservation and human interactions. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Ono M, Okada I, Sasaki M (1987) Heat production by balling in the Japanese honeybee Apis cerana japonica as a defensive behavior against the hornet, Vespa simillima xanthoptera (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). Experientia 43:1031–1032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ono M, Igarashi T, Ohno E, Sasaki M (1995) Unusual thermal defence by a honeybee against a mass attack by hornets. Nature 377:334–336

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rao D, Diaz-Fleischer F (2012) Characterization of predator-directed displays in Tephritid flies. Ethology 118:1165–1172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rösch GA (1925) Untersuchungen über die Arbeitsteilung im Bienenstaat. I Die Tätigkeiten im normalen Bienenstaat und ihre Beziehungen zum Alter der Arbeitsbienen. Z Vergl Physiol 2:571–631

    Google Scholar 

  • Rundus AS, Owings DH, Joshi SS, Chinn E, Giannini N (2007) Ground squirrels use an infrared signal to deter rattlesnake predation. Proc Nat Acad Sci U S A 104:14372–14376

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ruxton GD, Sherratt TN, Speed MP (2004) Avoiding attack: the evolutionary ecology of crypsis, warning signals and mimicry. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sakagami SF (1960) Preliminary report on the specific differences in behaviour and other ecological characters between European and Japanese honey bees. Acta Hymenopterologica 1:171–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Seeley TD, Kolmes SA (1991) Age polyethisms for hive duties in honey bees—illusion or reality? Ethology 87:284–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sendova-Franks A (2012) Hornet’s response to honeybee signal. Anim Behav 83:869–870

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan K, Radloff SE, Li JJ, Hepburn HR, Yang MX, Zhang LJ, Neumann P (2007) Bee-hawking by the wasp, Vespa veluntina, on the honey bees A. cerana and A. mellifera. Naturwissenschaften 94:469–472

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tan K, Wang Z, Li H, Yan S, Hu Z, Kastberger G, Oldroyd BP (2012) An ‘I see you’ prey–predator signal between the Asian honeybee (Apis cerana) and the hornet (Vespa velutina). Anim Behav 83:879–882

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vega-Renondo F, Hasson O (1993) A game-theoretic model of predator–prey signalling. J Theor Biol 162:309–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verplanck WS (1955) Since learned behavior is innate and vice versa, what now? Psych Rev 62:140–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walther FR (1969) Flight behaviour and avoidance of predators in Thompson’s gazelle (Gazella thomsoni Guenther 1884). Behaviour 34:184–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Key Laboratory of Tropical Forest Ecology, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Science and China National Research Fund (31260585) to KT.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Benjamin P. Oldroyd.

Additional information

Communicated by: Sven Thatje

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tan, K., Wang, Z., Chen, W. et al. The ‘I see you’ prey–predator signal of Apis cerana is innate. Naturwissenschaften 100, 245–248 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-013-1019-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-013-1019-4

Keywords

Navigation