Skip to main content
Log in

Experimental evidence that keeping eggs dry is a mechanism for the antimicrobial effects of avian incubation

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Naturwissenschaften Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Avian incubation dramatically reduces the abundance and diversity of microbial assemblages on eggshells, and this effect has been hypothesized as an adaptive explanation for partial incubation, the bouts of incubation that some birds perform during the egg-laying period. However, the mechanisms for these antimicrobial effects are largely unknown. In this study, we hypothesized that microbial inhibition is partly achieved through removal of liquid water, which generally enhances microbial growth, from eggshells, and experimentally tested this hypothesis in two ways. First, we placed the first- and second-laid eggs of tree swallow (Tachycineta bicolor) clutches in unincubated holding nests with either ambient or increased water on eggshells. Second, we added water to eggshells in naturally partially incubated nests. We compared microbial growth on shells during a 5-day experimental period and found that, as predicted, both unincubated groups had higher microbial growth than naturally partially incubated controls, and that only in the absence of incubation did wetted eggs have higher microbial growth than unwetted eggs. Thus, we have shown that water increases microbial growth on eggshells and that incubation nullifies these effects, suggesting that removal of water from egg surfaces is one proximate mechanism for the antimicrobial effects of incubation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amat JA, Masero JA (2007) The functions of belly-soaking in Kentish Plovers Charadrius alexandrinus. Ibis 149:91–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger S, Disko R, Gwinner H (2003) Bacteria in starling nests. J Ornithol 144:317–322

    Google Scholar 

  • Board RG, Fuller R (1974) Non-specific antimicrobial defences of avian egg embryo and neonate. Biol Rev 49:15–49

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Board RG, Tranter HS (1995) The microbiology of eggs. In: Stadelman WJ, Cotterill OJ (eds) Egg science and technology. Haworth, Binghamton, pp 81–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruce J, Drysdale EM (1991) Egg hygiene: routes of infection. In: Tullett SG (ed) Avian incubation. Butterworth Heinemann, Northampton, pp 257–276

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruce J, Drysdale EM (1994) Trans-shell transmission. In: Board RG Fuller R (ed) Microbiology of the avian egg. Chapman and Hall, London, pp 63–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook MI, Beissinger SR, Toranzos GA, Rodriguez RA, Arendt WJ (2003) Trans-shell infection by pathogenic micro-organisms reduces the shelf life of non-incubated bird’s eggs: a constraint on the onset of incubation? Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 270:2233–2240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook MI, Beissinger SR, Toranzos GA, Arendt WJ (2005a) Incubation reduces microbial growth on eggshells and the opportunity for trans-shell infection. Ecol Lett 8:532–537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook MI, Beissinger SR, Toranzos GA, Rodriguez RA, Arendt WJ (2005b) Microbial infection affects egg viability and incubation behavior in a tropical passerine. Behav Ecol 16:30–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deeming DC (1995) Factors affecting hatchability during commercial incubation of ostrich (Struthio camelus) eggs. Br Poult Sci 36:51–65

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Deeming DC (2002a) In: Deeming DC (ed) Avian incubation behaviour environment and evolution, vol 13, Oxford ornithology. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Deeming DC (2002b) Patterns and significance of egg turning. In: Deeming DC (ed) Avian incubation behaviour environment and evolution, vol 13, Oxford ornithology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 161–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Drent RH (1973) The natural history of incubation. In: Farner DS (ed) Breeding biology of birds. National Academy of Sciences, Washington, pp 262–332

    Google Scholar 

  • Fierer N, Jackson RB (2006) The diversity and biogeography of soil bacterial communities. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:626–632

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gill FB (1995) Nests and incubation. In: Gill FB (ed) Ornithology, 2nd edn. WH Freeman and Co., New York

  • Godard RD, Wilson M, Frick JW, Siegel PB, Bowers BB (2007) The effects of exposure and microbes on hatchability of eggs in open-cup and cavity nests. J Avian Biol 38:709–716

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heeb P, Kölliker M, Richner H (2000) Bird-ectoparasite interactions, nest humidity, and ectoparasite community structure. Ecology 81:958–968

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilton GM, Hansell MH, Ruxton GD, Reid JM, Monaghan P (2004) Using artificial nests to test importance of nesting material and nest shelter for incubation energetics. Auk 121:777–787

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houston S, Saunders JR, Crawford RD (1997) Aerobic bacterial flora of addled raptor eggs in Saskatchewan. J Wildl Dis 33:328–331

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jagnow J, Clegg S (2003) Klebsiella pneumoniae MrkD-mediated biofilm formation on extracellular matrix- and collagen-coated surfaces. Microbiology 149:2397–2405

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jetz W, Sekercioglu CH, Bohning-Gaese K (2008) The worldwide variation in avian clutch size across species and space. PLoS Biol 6:e303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kern MD, Cowie RJ (1995) Humidity levels in pied flycatcher nests measured using capsule hygrometers. Auk 112:564–570

    Google Scholar 

  • Lack DL (1947) The significance of clutch size, parts 1 and 2. Ibis 89: 302–352

    Google Scholar 

  • Madigan MT, Martinko JM, Dunlap PV, Clark DP (2005) Brock biology of microorganisms. Benjamin Cummings, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • McComb WC, Noble RE (1981) Microclimates of nest boxes and natural cavities in Bottomland Hardwoods. J Wildl Manage 45:284–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Messens W, Grijspeerdt K, Herman L (2005) Eggshell penetration by Salmonella: a review. World Poult Sci J 61:71–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patrick LB, Fraser LH, Kershener MW (2008) Large-scale manipulation of plant litter and fertilizer in a managed successional temperate grassland. Plant Ecol 197:183–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinowski J, Barkowska M, Kruszewicz A, Kruszewicz A (1994) The causes of the mortality of eggs and nestlings of Passer sp. J Biosci 19:441–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rendell WB, Verbeek NAM (1996) Old nest material in nest boxes of tree swallows: effects on nest-site choice and nest building. Auk 113:319–328

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson RJ, Stutchbury BJ, Cohen RR (1992) Tree swallow (Tachycineta bicolor). In: Poole A (ed) The birds of North America online Ithaca. Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Cornell

    Google Scholar 

  • Romanoff AL (1960) The avian embryo; structural and functional development. Macmillan, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Shawkey MD, Kosciuch KL, Liu M, Rohwer FC, Loos ER, Wang JM, Beissinger SR (2008) Do birds differentially distribute antimicrobial proteins within clutches of eggs? Behav Ecol 19:920–927

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shawkey MD, Firestone MK, Brodie EL, Beissinger SR (2009) Avian incubation inhibits growth and diversification of bacterial assemblages on eggs. PLoS ONE 4:e4522

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sparks N (1994) Shell accessory materials: structure and function. In: Board RG, Fuller R (eds) Microbiology of the avian egg. Chapman and Hall, London, pp 25–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens TO, Holbert BS (1995) Variability and density dependence of bacteria in terrestrial subsurface samples: implications for enumeration. J Microbiol Methods 21:283–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang JM, Beissinger SR (2009) Variation in the onset of incubation and its influence on avian hatching success and asynchrony. Anim Behav 78:601–613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wesołowski T, Czeszczewik D, Rowinski P, Walankiewicz W (2002) Nest soaking in natural holes—a serious cause of breeding failure? Ornis Fenn 79:138

    Google Scholar 

  • White FN, Kinney JL (1974) Avian incubation. Science 186:107–115

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson HR (1991) Physiological requirements of the developing embryo: temperature and turning. In: Tullett SG (ed) Avian incubation. Butterworth-Heineman, London, pp 145–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Zach R (1982) Hatching asynchrony egg size growth and fledging in tree swallows. Auk 99:695–700

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Liliana D’Alba.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

D’Alba, L., Oborn, A. & Shawkey, M.D. Experimental evidence that keeping eggs dry is a mechanism for the antimicrobial effects of avian incubation. Naturwissenschaften 97, 1089–1095 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-010-0735-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-010-0735-2

Keywords

Navigation