Skip to main content
Log in

Nutritional benefits of filial cannibalism in three-spined sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus)

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Naturwissenschaften Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although filial cannibalism (eating one’s own offspring) occurs in numerous species, including several teleost fishes, its adaptive value is still not well understood. One often-discussed explanation is that individuals enhance their mass and body condition by consuming part of their eggs. However, evidence for this assumption is scarce thus far. In this study, male three-spined sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus), a species with paternal care, were allowed to care for a batch of eggs or for an empty nest under food-deprived conditions. All brood-caring males cannibalised at least part of their eggs and thus preserved their initial mass and body condition. Furthermore, mass as well as body condition was significant positively correlated with the number of cannibalised eggs. In contrast, empty-nest males that had no possibility to cannibalise eggs significantly lost mass and body condition. This is, to our knowledge, the first experimentally documented evidence that mass as well as body condition were preserved by filial cannibalism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  • Allen JRM, Wootton RJ (1982) Age, growth and rate of food consumption in an upland population of the three-spined stickleback, Gasterosteus aculeatus L. J Fish Biol 21:95–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakker TCM, Mazzi D, Kraak SBM (2006) Broods of attractive three-spined stickleback males require greater paternal care. J Fish Biol 69:1164–1177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belles-Isles JC, FitzGerald GJ (1991) Filial cannibalism in sticklebacks: a reproductive management strategy? Ethol Ecol Evol 3:49–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolger T, Connolly PL (1989) The selection of suitable indices for the measurement and analysis of fish condition. J Fish Biol 34:171–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen J (1992) A power primer. Psychol Bull 112:155–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dingemanse NJ, Wright J, Kazem AJN, Thomas DK, Hickling R, Dawnay N (2007) Behavioural syndromes differ predictably between 12 populations of three-spined stickleback. J Anim Ecol 76:1128–1138

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Feuth-de Bruijn E, Sevenster P (1983) Parental reactions to young in sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus L.). Behaviour 86:186–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster SA, Scott RJ, Cresko WA (1998) Nested biological variation and speciation. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 353:207–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frommen JG, Brendler C, Bakker TCM (2007) The tale of the bad stepfather: male three-spined sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus L.) recognize foreign eggs in their manipulated nest by egg cues alone. J Fish Biol 70:1295–1301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomagano D, Kohda M (2008) Partial filial cannibalism enhances initial body condition and size in paternal care fish with strong male–male competition. Ann Zool Fenn 45:55–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Klug H, St Mary CM (2005) Reproductive fitness consequences of filial cannibalism in the flagfish, Jordanella floridae. Anim Behav 70:685–691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klug H, Bonsall MB (2007) When to care for, abandon, or eat your offspring: the evolution of parental care and filial cannibalism. Am Nat 170:886–901

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Klug H, Lindström K, St Mary CM (2006) Parents benefit from eating offspring: density-dependent egg survivorship compensates for filial cannibalism. Evolution 60:2087–2095

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kraak SBM (1996) Female preference and filial cannibalism in Aidablennius sphynx (Teleostei, Blenniidae): a combined field and laboratory study. Behav Process 36:85–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraak SBM, Bakker TCM, Mundwiler B (1997) How to quantify embryo survival in nest-building fishes, exemplified with three-spined sticklebacks. J Fish Biol 51:1262–1264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kvarnemo C, Svensson O, Forsgren E (1998) Parental behaviour in relation to food availability in the common goby. Anim Behav 56:1285–1290

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Manica A (2002) Filial cannibalism in teleost fish. Biol Rev 77:261–277

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Manica A (2003) The effect of brood size and age on partial filial cannibalism in the scissortail sergeant. J Fish Biol 63:37–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manica A (2004) Parental fish change their cannibalistic behaviour in response to the cost-to-benefit ratio of parental care. Anim Behav 67:1015–1021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okuda N, Yanagisawa Y (1996) Filial cannibalism by mouthbrooding males of the cardinal fish, Apogon doederleini, in relation to their physical condition. Env Biol Fish 45:397–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Payne AG, Smith C, Campbell AC (2003) The effect of clutch size on whole clutch cannibalism in the beaugregory damselfish. J Fish Biol 62:955–958

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfennig DW (1997) Kinship and cannibalism. Bioscience 47:667–675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polis GA (1981) The evolution and dynamics of intraspecific predation. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 12:225–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowher S (1978) Parent cannibalism of offspring and egg raiding as a courtship strategy. Am Nat 112:429–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sargent RC (1985) Territoriality and reproductive tradeoffs in the threespine stickleback, Gasterosteus aculeatus. Behaviour 93:217–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sargent RC (1992) Ecology of filial cannibalism in fish: Theoretical perspective. In: Elgar MA, Crespi BJ (eds) Cannibalism: ecology and evolution among diverse taxa. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 38–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith C (1992) Filial cannibalism as a reproductive strategy in care-giving teleosts. Neth J Zool 42:607–613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith C, Wootton RJ (1999) Parental energy expenditure of the male three-spined stickleback. J Fish Biol 54:1132–1136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sparkes TC, Rush V, Foster SA (2008) Reproductive costs, condition and carotenoid-based colour in natural populations of threespine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus). Ecol Freshw Fish 17:292–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas LK, Manica A (2003) Filial cannibalism in an assassin bug. Anim Behav 66:205–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van den Assem J (1967) Territory in the three-spined stickleback Gasterosteus aculeatus L. An experimental study in intra-specific competition. Behaviour Suppl 16:1–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Whoriskey FG, FitzGerald GJ (1985) Sex, cannibalism and sticklebacks. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 18:15–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Wootton RJ (1976) The biology of the sticklebacks. Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the “Bakker” group for the discussion. We thank Jan Hottentot for catching the fish. Meike Hiermes is acknowledged for improving our English. Tatiana Czeschlik, Susan Foster and two anonymous referees provided thoughtful comments on an earlier version of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marion Mehlis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mehlis, M., Bakker, T.C.M. & Frommen, J.G. Nutritional benefits of filial cannibalism in three-spined sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus). Naturwissenschaften 96, 399–403 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-008-0485-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-008-0485-6

Keywords

Navigation