Skip to main content
Log in

Bird pollination of Canary Island endemic plants

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Naturwissenschaften Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Canary Islands are home to a guild of endemic, threatened bird-pollinated plants. Previous work has suggested that these plants evolved floral traits as adaptations to pollination by flower specialist sunbirds, but subsequently, they appear to have co-opted generalist passerine birds as sub-optimal pollinators. To test this idea, we carried out a quantitative study of the pollination biology of three of the bird-pollinated plants, Canarina canariensis (Campanulaceae), Isoplexis canariensis (Veronicaceae) and Lotus berthelotii (Fabaceae), on the island of Tenerife. Using colour vision models, we predicted the detectability of flowers to bird and bee pollinators. We measured pollinator visitation rates, nectar standing crops as well as seed-set and pollen removal and deposition. These data showed that the plants are effectively pollinated by non-flower specialist passerine birds that only occasionally visit flowers. The large nectar standing crops and extended flower longevities (>10 days) of Canarina and Isoplexis suggests that they have evolved a bird pollination system that effectively exploits these low frequency non-specialist pollen vectors and is in no way sub-optimal. Seed set in two of the three species was high and was significantly reduced or zero in flowers where pollinator access was restricted. In L. berthelotii, however, no fruit set was observed, probably because the plants were self-incompatible horticultural clones of a single genet. We also show that, while all three species are easily detectable for birds, the orange Canarina and the red Lotus (but less so the yellow-orange Isoplexis) should be difficult to detect for insect pollinators without specialised red receptors, such as bumblebees. Contrary to expectations if we accept that the flowers are primarily adapted to sunbird pollination, the chiffchaff (Phylloscopus canariensis) was an effective pollinator of these species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allan GJ, Francisco-Ortega J, Santos-Guerra A, Boerner E, Zimmer EA (2004) Molecular phylogenetic evidence for the geographic origin and classification of Canary Island Lotus (Fabaceae: Loteae). Mol Phylogenet Evol 32:123–138

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ashman T-L, Schoen DJ (1994) How long should flowers live? Nature 371:788–791

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ashman T-L, Schoen DJ (1996) Floral longevity: fitness consequences and resource costs. In: Lloyd DG, Barrett SCH (eds) Floral Biology: Studies on floral evolution in animal-pollinated plants. Chapman and Hall, New York, pp 112–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowmaker JK, Heath LA, Wilkie SE, Hunt DM (1997) Visual pigments and oil droplets from six classes of photoreceptors in the retinas of birds. Vision Res 37:2183–2194

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bramwell D, Bramwell Z (2001) Wild flowers of the Canary Islands. Editorial Rueda, Madrid

    Google Scholar 

  • Bräuchler C, Meimberg H, Heubl G (2004) Molecular phylogeny of the genera Digitalis L. and Isoplexis (Lindley) Loudon (Veronicaceae) based on ITS- and trnL-F sequences. Plant Syst Evol 248:111–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carine MA, Russell SJ, Santos-Guerra A, Francisco-Ortega J (2004) Relationships of the Macaronesian and Mediterranean floras: Molecular evidence for multiple colonizations into Macaronesia and back-colonization of the continent in Convolvulus (Convolvulaceae). Am J Bot 91:1070–1085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chittka L (1996) Optimal sets of colour receptors and opponent processes for coding of natural objects in insect vision. J Theo Biol 181:179–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chittka L (1997) Bee color vision is optimal for coding flower colors, but flower colors are not optimal for being coded—why? Israel J Plant Sci 45:115–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Chittka L, Raine NE (2006) Recognition of flowers by pollinators. Curr Opin Plant Biol 9:428–435

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chittka L, Ings TC, Raine NE (2004) Chance and adaptation in the evolution of island bumblebee behaviour. Popul Ecol 46:243–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clement P (1995) The chiffchaff. Hamlyn, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Dafni A, Kevan PG, Husband BC (2005) Practical pollination biology. Enviroquest, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Dupont YL, Olesen JM (2004) Fugleblomster på de Kanariske Øer. Naturens Verden 87:2–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Dupont YL, Skov C (2004) Influence of geographical distribution and floral traits on species richness of bees (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) visiting Echium species (Boraginaceae) of the Canary Islands. Int J Plant Sci 165:377–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dupont YL, Hansen DM, Olesen JM (2003) Structure of a plant-flower-visitor network in the high-altitude sub-alpine desert of Tenerife, Canary Islands. Ecography 26:301–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dupont YL, Hansen DM, Rasmussen JT, Olesen JM (2004) Evolutionary changes in nectar sugar composition associated with switches between bird and insect pollination: the Canarian bird-flower element revisited. Funct Ecol 18:670–676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francisco-Ortega J, Santos-Guerra A, Kim SC, Crawford DJ (2000) Plant genetic diversity in the Canary Islands: A conservation perspective. Am J Bot 87:909–919

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Galetto L, Bernardello L (1992) Nectar secretion pattern and removal effects in six Argentinean Pitcairnioideae (Bromeliaceae). Bot Act 105:292–299

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia JDD (2000) Patterns of insect flower visitation in Lavandula bucchii Webb (Lamiaceae), an endemic shrub of Tenerife (Canary Islands). J Nat Hist 34:2145–2155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gill R, Thirlwall M, Marriner G, Millward D, Norry M, Saunders A, Martí J (1994) Tenerife, Canary Islands: Geologists’ Association Guide No. 49. Geologists’ Association, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Giurfa M, Vorobyev M, Kevan P, Menzel R (1996) Detection of coloured stimuli by honeybees: minimum visual angles and receptor specific contrasts. J Comp Physiol A 178:699–709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gumbert A, Kunze J, Chittka L (1999) Flower color diversity in plant communities, bee color space, and a null model. P Roy Soc Lond B Bio 266:1711–1716

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart NS (2001) The visual ecology of avian photoreceptors. Prog Retin Eye Res 20:675–703

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hart NS, Vorobyev M (2005) Modelling oil droplet absorption spectra and spectral sensitivities of bird cone photoreceptors. J Comp Physiol A 191:381–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart NS, Partridge JC, Cuthill IC, Bennett ATD (2000) Visual pigments, oil droplets and cone photoreceptor distribution in two species of passerine bird: the blue tit (Parus caerulus L.) and the blackbird (Turdus merula L.). J Comp Physiol A 186:375–387

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich B (1979) Bumblebee economics. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson SD, Nicolson SW (2007) Evolutionary associations between nectar properties and specificity in bird pollination systems. Biology Letters 4(1):49–52 doi:10.1098/rsbl.2007.0496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kearns CA, Inouye DW (1993) Techniques for pollination biologists. University Press of Colorado, Niwot

    Google Scholar 

  • Kevan PG, Backhaus W (1998) Color vision: ecology and evolution in making the best of the photic environment. In: Backhaus W, Kliegl R, Werner JS (eds) Color vision - perspectives from different disciplines. Gruyter, Berlin, pp 163–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Kevan PG, Chittka L, Dyer AG (2001) Limits to the salience of ultraviolet: lessons from colour vision in bees and birds. J Exp Biol 204:2571–2580

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lems K (1960) Botanical notes on the Canary Islands II. The evolution of plant forms in the islands: Aeonium. Ecology 41:1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mabberley DJ (1990) The plant book. Cambridge Univerity Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicolson SW, Fleming PA (2003) Nectar as food for birds: the physiological consequences of drinking dilute sugar solutions. Plant Syst Evol 238:139–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Olesen JM (1985) The Macaronesian bird-flower element and its relation to bird and bee opportunists. Bot J Linn Soc 91:395–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ollerton J, Grace J, Smith K (2007) Pollinator behaviour and adaptive floral colour change in Anthophora alluadii (Hymenoptera: Apidae) and Erysimum scoparium (Brassicaceae) on Tenerife. Entomol Gen 29:253–268

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortega-Olivencia A, Rodríguez-Riaño T, Valtueña FJ, López J, Devesa JA (2005) First confirmation of a native bird-pollinated plant in Europe. Oikos 110:578–590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Primack RB (1985) Longevity of individual flowers. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 16:15–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Proctor M, Yeo P, Lack A (1996) The natural history of pollination. HarperCollins, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez MC and Valido A (2008) Effectiveness of opportunistic passerine pollinators of Isoplexis canariensis (Scrophulariaceae). In: The Evolutionary Ecology of Plant Animal Interactions: from Genes to Communities: Ecoevolutiva Symposium, Abstract Volume, p.77

  • Silvertown J (2004) The ghost of competition past in the phylogeny of island endemic plants. J Ecol 92:168–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skorupski P, Doering T, Chittka L (2007) Photoreceptor spectral sensitivity in island and mainland populations of the bumblebee, Bombus terrestris. J Comp Physiol A 193:485–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stelzer R, Ollerton J, Chittka L (2007) Kein Nachweis für Hummelbesuch der Kanarischen Vogelblumen (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Entomol Gen 30:153–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Valido A, Dupont YL, Hansen DM (2002) Native birds and insects, and introduced honeybees visiting Echium wildpretii (Boraginaceae) in the Canary Islands. Acta Oecologica 23:413–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valido A, Dupont YL, Olesen JM (2004) Bird-flower interactions in the Macaronesian islands. J Biogeogr 31:1945–1953

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valtueña FJ, Ortega-Olivencia A, Rodriguez-Riano T (2007) Nectar production in Anagyris foetida (Fabaceae): Two types of concentration in flowers with hanging droplet. Int J Plant Sci 168:627–638

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogel S (1954) Blütenbiologische Typen als Elemente der Sippengliederung. Botanische Studien (Jena) 1:1–338

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel S, Westerkamp C, Thiel B, Gessner K (1984) Ornithophilie auf den Canarischen Inseln. Plant Syst Evol 146:225–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willis DS, Kevan PG (1995) Foraging dynamics of Peponapis pruinosa (Hymenoptera: Anthophoridae) on Pumpkin (Cucurbita pepo) in Southern Ontario. Can Entomol 127:167–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodell SRJ (1979) The role of unspecialized pollinators in the reproductive success of Aldabaran plants. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 286:99–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wyszecki G, Stiles WS (1982) Color science: Concepts and methods, quantitative data and formulae, Volume 2. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by NERC grant number NER/B/S/2003/00811. We are grateful to Servicio Administrativo de Medio Ambiente, Excmo. Cabildo Insular de Tenerife for permission to work in Tenerife (Permit DNI: 203067161), El Parque del Drago for allowing us to observe L. berthelotii, and to Sr. Damián de Torres for assisting with resources and providing local knowledge. Thanks to Dr. Yoko Dupont for information on field sites, Dr. Ana Ortega-Olivencia for sharing originally unpublished data on A. foetida flower longevity, and Dr. Tia-Lynn Ashman for discussion. All experiments comply with the current laws of the country in which they were performed.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lars Chittka.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ollerton, J., Cranmer, L., Stelzer, R.J. et al. Bird pollination of Canary Island endemic plants. Naturwissenschaften 96, 221–232 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-008-0467-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-008-0467-8

Keywords

Navigation