Abstract
We investigated the mating patterns in 22 breeding pairs of wild American goldfinches (Carduelis tristis) with respect to their body size, condition, and carotenoid-based, yellow plumage colour. Using reflectance spectrometry, we objectively quantified plumage colours across the bird-visible wavelengths, revealing a unexpected UV peak in the reflectance spectrum from yellow feathers. We summarized our colour measurements using a principal components analysis to create a single variable, carotenoid PC1, that represents the intensity of this carotenoid-based yellow colour, a measure of phenotypic quality in this species. We found no evidence of assortative mating with respect to measures of body size or condition but there was positive assortative mating by carotenoid PC1, such that the yellow plumage colours of males and females were significantly correlated within pairs. We argue that the yellow carotenoid coloration of goldfinches may be important in mutual mate choice and, thus, that sexual selection in this species may act upon female ornamentation, as well as the more obvious plumage signals of males. Because assortative mating results in an increase in genetic variance, we suggest that this might be a mechanism that maintains variance in ornamental traits in spite of the variance-eroding effects of sexual selection.
References
Andersson S, Örnborg J, Andersson M (1998) Ultraviolet sexual dimorphism and assortative mating in blue tits. Proc R Soc Lond B 265:445–450
Brown ME (1996) Assessing body condition in birds. Curr Ornithol 13:67–135
Burley N (1983) The meaning of assortative mating. Ethol Sociobiol 4:191–203
Burley N, Krantzberg G, Radman P (1982) Influence of colour-banding on the conspecific preferences of zebra finches. Anim Behav 30:444–455
Crespi BJ (1989) Causes of assortative mating in arthropods. Anim Behav 38:980–1000
Doucet SM, Montgomerie R (2003) Multiple sexual ornaments in satin bowerbirds: ultraviolet plumage and bowers signal different aspects of male quality. Behav Ecol 14:503–509
Gissing GJ, Crease TJ, Middleton ALA (1998) Extrapair paternity associated with renesting in the American goldfinch. Auk 115:230–234
Hart NS, Partridge JC, Bennett ATD, Cuthill IC (2000) Visual pigments, cone oil droplets and ocular media of four species of estrildid finch. J Comp Physiol A 186:375–387
Hill GE (1991) Plumage coloration is a sexually selected indicator of male quality. Nature 350:337–339
Hill GE (1993) Male mate choice and the evolution of female plumage coloration in the house finch. Evolution 47:1515–1525
Hunt S, Cuthill IC, Bennett ATD, Church SC, Partridge JC (2001) Is the ultraviolet waveband a special communication channel in avian mate choice? J Exp Biol 204:2499–2507
Johnson K, Dalton R, Burley N (1993) Preferences of female American goldfinches (Carduelis tristis) for natural and artificial male traits. Behav Ecol 4:138–143
Johnstone RA, Reynolds JD, Deutsch JC (1996) Mutual mate choice and sex differences in choosiness. Evolution 50:1382–1391
Jones IL, Montgomerie R (1991) Mating and remating in least auklets (Aethia pusilla) relative to ornamental traits. Behav Ecol 2:249–257
Kempenaers B (1994) Polygyny in the blue tit: unbalanced sex ratio and female aggression restrict mate choice. Anim Behav 47:943–957
McGraw KJ, Hill GE (2000) Differential effects of endoparasitism on the expression of carotenoid- and melanin-based ornamental coloration. Proc R Soc Lond B 267:1525–1531
McGraw KJ, Hill GE, Stradi R, Parker RS (2001) The influence of carotenoid acquisition and utilization on the maintenance of species: typical plumage pigmentation in male American goldfinches (Carduelis tristis) and Northern cardinals (Cardinalis cardinalis). Physiol Biochem Zool 74:843–852
Middleton ALA (1993) American goldfinch (Carduelis tristis). In: Poole A, Gill R (eds) The birds of North America, vol 80. Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia
Olson VA, Owens IPF (1998) Costly sexual signals: are carotenoids rare, risky or required? Trends Ecol Evol 13:510–514
Partridge L (1983) Non-random mating and offspring fitness. In: Bateson P (ed) Mate choice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 227–255
Saks L, McGraw K, Hõrak P (2003) How feather colour reflects its carotenoid content. Functional Ecol 17:555–561
Acknowledgements
We thank A. Oey for field assistance, Queen's University Biological Station for logistic support, S. Andersson and M. Rathburn for useful discussions, and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada for grants to R.M. and a scholarship to A.K.M. This study was done under the authority of a permit from the Canadian Wildlife Service and an Animal Care Protocol from Queen's University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
MacDougall, A.K., Montgomerie, R. Assortative mating by carotenoid-based plumage colour: a quality indicator in American goldfinches, Carduelis tristis . Naturwissenschaften 90, 464–467 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-003-0459-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-003-0459-7