Zusammenfassung
Die chirurgische Hauptvorlesung hat auch im Zeitalter vielfältiger digitaler und frei verfügbarer Lerninhalte eine zentrale Bedeutung. Sie dient als Diskussionsplattform mit dem Dozenten und bietet die Möglichkeit, mit Live-Operationen und Patientenbeispielen die Lehre anschaulich und lebendig zu gestalten. Gelingt der Paradigmenwechsel weg von der reinen Wissensvermittlung zur Wissensvernetzung, wird die chirurgische Hauptvorlesung auch in Zukunft ein elementarer Bestandteil der studentischen Lehre sein, durch den der Dozent mit seiner Begeisterung für das eigene Fach die Studenten erreichen und für die Chirurgie interessieren kann.
Abstract
In times of manifold digital learning resources open to public access lectures in surgery still play a major role in medical training. It is a platform for discussion with the medical teacher and provides the opportunity to create a vivid learning experience by showing live operations via video streaming and inviting patients to the lectures. When then change in paradigm is achieved from pure knowledge transfer to cross-linkage of knowledge, the surgical lecture will be a major future keystone in medical education, where the lecturer can reach the students with his own passion for the field of expertise and get them interested in surgery.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Literatur
Blouin RA, Riffee WH, Robinson ET et al (2009) Roles of innovation in education delivery. Am J Pharm Educ 73:154
Chan WP (2009) Assessment of medical students‘ knowledge retention in a diagnostic radiology course: lecture attendees versus absentees. Ann Acad Med Singapore 38:237–239
Manzoor I, Mumtaz A, Habib M et al (2011) Lectures in medical education: students‘ views. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad 23:118–121
Bati AH, Mandiracioglu A, Orgun F et al (2013) Why do students miss lectures? A study of lecture attendance amongst students of health science. Nurse Educ Today 33:596–601
Stegers-Jager KM, Cohen-Schotanus J, Themmen AP (2012) Motivation, learning strategies, participation and medical school performance. Med Educ 46:678–688
Suda KJ, Bell GC, Franks AS (2011) Faculty and student perceptions of effective study strategies and materials. Am J Pharm Educ 75:201
Gurpinar E, Alimoglu MK, Mamakli S et al (2010) Can learning style predict student satisfaction with different instruction methods and academic achievement in medical education? Adv Physiol Educ 34:192–196
Horton DM, Wiederman SD, Saint DA (2012) Assessment outcome is weakly correlated with lecture attendance: influence of learning style and use of alternative materials. Adv Physiol Educ 36:108–115
Bacro TR, Gebregziabher M, Fitzharris TP (2010) Evaluation of a lecture recording system in a medical curriculum. Anat Sci Educ 3:300–308
White JS, Sharma N, Boora P (2011) Surgery 101: evaluating the use of podcasting in a general surgery clerkship. Med Teach 33:941–943
Cardall S, Krupat E, Ulrich M (2008) Live lecture versus video-recorded lecture: are students voting with their feet? Acad Med 83:1174–1178
Dibacco PM, Hetherington VJ, Putman D (2012) Lecture capture: enhancing learning through technology at the Kent State University College of Podiatric Medicine. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 102:491–498
Martin SI, Way DP, Verbeck N et al (2013) The impact of lecture attendance and other variables on how medical students evaluate faculty in a preclinical program. Acad Med 88:972–977
Einhaltung ethischer Richtlinien
Interessenkonflikt. A. Wierlemann, J. Baur und C.T. Germer geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht. Dieser Beitrag beinhaltet keine Studien an Menschen oder Tieren.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wierlemann, A., Baur, J. & Germer, C. Die chirurgische Frontalvorlesung. Chirurg 84, 835–840 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-013-2533-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-013-2533-9