Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

RISC II is superior to TRISS in predicting 30-day mortality in blunt major trauma patients in Hong Kong

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Hong Kong (HK) trauma registries have been using the Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS) for audit and benchmarking since their introduction in 2000. We compare the mortality prediction model using TRISS and Revised Injury Severity Classification, version II (RISC II) for trauma centre patients in HK.

Methods

This was a retrospective cohort study with all five trauma centres in HK. Adult trauma patients with Injury Severity Score (ISS) > 15 suffering from blunt injuries from January 2013 to December 2015 were included. TRISS models using the US and local coefficients were compared with the RISC II model. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for tested models.

Results

1840 patients were included, of whom 1236/1840 (67%) were male. Median age was 59 years and median ISS was 25. Low falls were the most common mechanism of injury. The 30-day mortality was 23%. RISC II yielded a superior AUC of 0.896, compared with the TRISS models (MTOS: 0.848; PATOS: 0.839; HK: 0.858). Prespecified subgroup analyses showed that all the models performed worse for age ≥ 70, ASA ≥ III, and low falls. RISC II had a higher AUC compared with the TRISS models in all subgroups, although not statistically significant.

Conclusion

RISC II was superior to TRISS in predicting the 30-day mortality for Hong Kong adult blunt major trauma patients. RISC II may be useful when performing future audit or benchmarking exercises for trauma in Hong Kong.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and materials

Data may be available from the corresponding author on specific request.

References

  1. World Health Organization. The top 10 causes of death. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/the-top-10-causes-of-death. Accessed 29 December 2020.

  2. Nathens AB, Jurkovich GJ, Rivara FP, Maier RV. Effectiveness of state trauma systems in reducing injury-related mortality: a national evaluation. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2000;48(1):25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Champion HR, Sacco WJ, Hunt TK. Trauma severity scoring to predict mortality. World J Surg. 1983;7(1):4–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Champion HR, Copes WS, Sacco WJ, Lawnick MM, Keast SL, Bain JL, Flanagan ME, Frey CF. The Major Trauma Outcome Study: establishing national norms for trauma care. J Trauma. 1990;30(11):1356–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Champion HR, Sacco WJ, Copes WS. Injury severity scoring again. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 1995;38(1):94–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Schluter PJ, Nathens A, Neal ML, Goble S, Cameron CM, Davey TM, et al. Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS) coefficients 2009 revision. J Trauma. 2010;68:761–70.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rogers FB, Osler T, Krasne M, Rogers A, Bradburn EH, Lee JC, et al. Has TRISS become an anachronism? A comparison of mortality between the National Trauma Data Bank and Major Trauma Outcome Study databases. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;73:326–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Willis CD, Gabbe BJ, Cameron PA. Measuring quality in trauma care. Injury. 2007;38(5):527–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gruen RL, Gabbe BJ, Stelfox HT, Cameron PA. Indicators of the quality of trauma care and the performance of trauma systems. Br J Surg. 2012;99(S1):97–104.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. de Munter L, Polinder S, Lansink KW, Cnossen MC, Steyerberg EW, de Jongh MA. Mortality prediction models in the general trauma population: a systematic review. Injury. 2017;48(2):221–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Domingues CD, Nogueira LD, Settervall CH, Sousa RM. Performance of Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS) adjustments: an integrative review. Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP. 2015 Dec;49(SPE):138–46.

  12. Schluter PJ. Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS): is it time for variable re-categorisations and re-characterisations? Injury. 2011;42:83–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Schluter PJ. The Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS) revised. Injury. 2011;42:90–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bergeron E, Rossignol M, Osler T. Improving the TRISS methodology by restructuring age categories and adding comorbidities. J Trauma. 2004;56:760–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. de Alencar DC, Coimbra R, Poggetti RS, de Souza NL, de Sousa RM. New Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS) adjustments for survival prediction. World journal of emergency surgery. 2018;13(1):12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kang IH, Lee KH, Youk H, Lee JI, Lee HY, Bae KS. Trauma and Injury Severity Score modification for predicting survival of trauma in one regional emergency medical center in Korea: construction of Trauma and Injury Severity Score coefficient model. Hong Kong Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2019;26(4):225–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Jung K, Huh Y, Lee JC, Kim Y, Moon J, Youn SH, Kim J, Kim J, Kim H. The applicability of Trauma and Injury Severity Score for a blunt trauma population in Korea and a proposal of new models using score predictors. Yonsei Med J. 2016;57(3):728–34.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Deshmukh VU, Ketkar MN, Bharucha EK. Analysis of trauma outcome using the TRISS method at a tertiary care centre in Pune. Indian J Surg. 2012;74:440–4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Kimura A, Chadbunchachai W, Nakahara S. Modification of the Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS) method provides better survival prediction in Asian blunt trauma victims. World J Surg. 2012;36:813–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kim S. Model development and validation for the probability of survival for trauma in Asia. [Presentation] Pan-Asian Trauma Outcomes Study Research Day 2020. 15 December 2020.

  21. Chan CK, Yau KK, Cheung MT. Trauma survival prediction in Asian population: a modification of TRISS to improve accuracy. Emerg Med J. 2014;31(2):126–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Cayten CG, Stahl WM, Murphy JG, Agarwal N, Byrne DW. Limitations of the TRISS method for interhospital comparisons: a multihospital study. J Trauma. 1991;31(4):471–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Demetriades D, Chan LS, Velmahos G, Berne TV, Cornwell EE III, Belzberg H, Asensio JA, Murray J, Berne J, Shoemaker W. TRISS methodology in trauma: the need for alternatives. Br J Surg. 1998;85(3):379–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Demetriades D, Chan L, Velmanos GV, Sava J, Preston C, Gruzinski G, et al. TRISS methodology: an inappropriate tool for comparing outcomes between trauma centers. J Am Coll Surg. 2001;193:250–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Gabbe BJ, Cameron PA, Wolfe R. TRISS: does it get better than this? Acad Emerg Med. 2004;11(2):181–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ringdal KG, Skaga NO, Hestnes M, Steen PA, Røislien J, Rehn M, Røise O, Krüger AJ, Lossius HM. Abbreviated Injury Scale: Not a reliable basis for summation of injury severity in trauma facilities? Injury. 2013;44(5):691–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Rutledge R. The Injury Severity Score is unable to differentiate between poor care and severe injury. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 1996;40(6):944–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Tohira H, Jacobs I, Mountain D, Gibson N, Yeo A. Systematic review of predictive performance of injury severity scoring tools. Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine. 2012;20(1):63.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Joosse PI, Goslings JC, Luitse JS, Ponsen KJ. M-statistic study: arguments for regional trauma databases. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2005;58(6):1272–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Lefering R. Development and validation of the revised injury severity classification score for severely injured patients. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2009;35(5):437–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Lefering R, Huber-Wagner S, Nienaber U, Maegele M, Bouillon B. Update of the trauma risk adjustment model of the TraumaRegister DGUTM: the Revised Injury Severity Classification, version II. Crit Care. 2014;18(5):476.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Brilej D, Vlaović M, Komadina R. Improved prediction from revised injury severity classification (RISC) over trauma and injury severity score (TRISS) in an independent evaluation of major trauma patients. J Int Med Res. 2010;38(4):1530–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Cheung NK, Yeung JH, Chan JT, Cameron PA, Graham CA, Rainer TH. Primary trauma diversion: initial experience in Hong Kong. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2006;61(4):954–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Cheng CH, Graham CA, Gabbe BJ, Yeung JH, Kossmann T, Judson RT, Rainer TH, Cameron PA. Trauma care systems: a comparison of trauma care in Victoria, Australia, and Hong Kong. China Annals of surgery. 2008;247(2):335–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Hung KK, Yeung JH, Cheung CS, Leung LY, Cheng RC, Cheung NK, Graham CA. Trauma team activation criteria and outcomes of geriatric trauma: 10 year single centre cohort study. Am J Emerg Med. 2019;37(3):450–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Lai CY, Maegele M, Yeung JH, Lefering R, Hung KC, Chan PS, Leung M, Wong HT, Wong JK, Graham CA, Cheng CH. Major trauma care in Hong Kong and Germany: a trauma registry data benchmark study. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2020;3:1.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Coats TJ, Lecky F. ‘Major trauma’: now two separate diseases? Emerg Med J. 2017;34(8):494. https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2017-206788.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Wong TH, Nguyen HV, Chiu MT, Chow KY, Ong ME, Lim GH, Nadkarni NV, Bautista DC, Cheng JY, Loo LM, Seow DC. The low fall as a surrogate marker of frailty predicts long-term mortality in older trauma patients. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(9):e0137127.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Zafar SN, Shah AA, Zogg CK, Hashmi ZG, Greene WR, Haut ER, Cornwell EE III, Haider AH. Morbidity or mortality? Variations in trauma centres in the rescue of older injured patients. Injury. 2016;47(5):1091–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. De Munter L, Ter Bogt NC, Polinder S, Sewalt CA, Steyerberg EW, de Jongh MA. Improvement of the performance of survival prediction in the ageing blunt trauma population: a cohort study. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(12):e0209099.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Skaga NO, Eken T, Søvik S, Jones JM, Steen PA. Pre-injury ASA physical status classification is an independent predictor of mortality after trauma. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2007;63(5):972–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Tran A, Mai T, El-Haddad J, Lampron J, Yelle JD, Pagliarello G, Matar M. Preinjury ASA score as an independent predictor of readmission after major traumatic injury. Trauma Surg Acute Care Open 2017; 2(1): e000128

  43. Lefering R, Huber-Wagner S, Bouillon B, Lawrence T, Lecky F, Bouamra O. Cross-validation of two prognostic trauma scores in severely injured patients. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2020;22:1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Hashmi A, Ibrahim-Zada I, Rhee P, Aziz H, Fain MJ, Friese RS, Joseph B. Predictors of mortality in geriatric trauma patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014;76(3):894–901.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Kaplan SJ, Pham TN, Arbabi S, Gross JA, Damodarasamy M, Bentov I, Taitsman LA, Mitchell SH, Reed MJ. Association of radiologic indicators of frailty with 1-year mortality in older trauma patients: opportunistic screening for sarcopenia and osteopenia. JAMA Surgery. 2017;152(2):e164604

  46. Dente CJ, Ashley DW, Dunne JR, Henderson V, Ferdinand C, Renz B, Massoud R, Adamski J, Hawke T, Gravlee M, Cascone J. Heterogeneity in trauma registry data quality: implications for regional and national performance improvement in trauma. J Am Coll Surg. 2016;222(3):288–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Loftis KL, Price J, Gillich PJ. Evolution of the abbreviated injury scale: 1990–2015. Traffic Inj Prev. 2018;19(sup2):S109–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Hsu SY, Wu SC, Rau CS, Hsieh TM, Liu HT, Huang CY, Chou SE, Su WT, Hsieh CH. Impact of adapting the Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS)-2005 from AIS-1998 on Injury Severity Scores and clinical outcome. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(24):5033.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Palmer CS, Gabbe BJ, Cameron PA. Defining major trauma using the 2008 Abbreviated Injury Scale. Injury. 2016;47(1):109–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank all the staff from all 5 trauma registries in Hong Kong, namely the Prince of Wales Hospital, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Princess Margaret Hospital, Tuen Mun Hospital and Queen Mary Hospital for their contribution to the study.

Funding

No funding available.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

KH CL JY contributed to the conception of the study. KH CL JY LC ML HW JW designed the study, contributes to the coordination of the study and the acquisition of the study data. KH CL MM analysed the data, LY MC CC NC CG interpreted data for the work. KH drafted the manuscript, all authors critically revised the manuscript and agreed to the final version of the manuscript. All authors agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Colin Alexander Graham.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical approval obtained from the Joint CUHK-NTEC Clinical Research Ethics Committee (CREC) (2016.538), NTWC CREC (NTWC/CREC/17031), KCC/KEC CREC (KC/KE-1–0194/ER-2), KWC CREC (KW/EX-17–056(110–02)) and HKU/HKWC CREC (UW 16–2070).

Consent for publication

The manuscript did not contain individuals’ person detailed data in any form.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hung, K.C.K., Lai, C.Y., Yeung, J.H.H. et al. RISC II is superior to TRISS in predicting 30-day mortality in blunt major trauma patients in Hong Kong. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 48, 1093–1100 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-021-01667-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-021-01667-3

Keywords

Navigation