Abstract
Introduction
Neglected pelvic fractures manifesting as pelvic nonunion or malunion are usually due to inadequate initial fixation or negligence of the injury because of increased attention towards other associated life-threatening conditions. The management of such injuries is complex. A systematic review was conducted to spot the clinical manifestations, evaluation, management and outcome of pelvic nonunion and malunion.
Materials and methods
Two databases (“Pubmed” and “Google scholar”) were searched to look for relevant literature on pelvic non-union and malunion. The search was limited to ‘English language’ and ‘Human being’.
Results
A total of 500 articles found, of which 10 articles were only reviewed which met the inclusion criteria. These articles discussed the clinical management and treatment of pelvic malunion and non-union following trauma without associated acetabular injury.
Conclusion
The usual presentations of pelvic non-union and malunion are pain, deformity, gait abnormality or instability. A detailed preoperative evaluation is essential as a majority of them have associated hip and spine injury which may be the cause of symptoms. Radiographs and 3D CT scans have helped surgeons in deciding the best way of management. The surgeries are usually complex and may need multiple-staged procedures. Soft tissue release, multiple osteotomies to achieve anatomical or near-anatomical reduction, augmentation of healing process using bone graft and stabilizing the nonunion/ osteotomy site using plates/screws/rods is the basic principle of surgery. Per-operative use of somato-sensory evoked potential evaluation helps the surgeon in preventing iatrogenic nerve injury. Despite these precautions and surgeries, most of the patients do not regain their preinjury functional activity.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Papadopoulos IN, Kanakaris N, Bonovas S, et al. Auditing 655 fatalities with pelvic fractures by autopsy as a basis to evaluate trauma care. J Am Coll Surg. 2006;203:30–43.
CDC. WISQARS (Web-based injury statistics query and reporting system). Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Ser vices, CDC; 2010. Available at http://www.cdc.gov/injury/wisqars. Accessed 12 Oct, 2010.
Naumann RB, Dellinger AM, Zaloshnja E, Lawrence BA, Miller TR. Incidence and total lifetime costs of motor vehicle-related fatal and nonfatal injury by road user type, United States, 2005. Traffic Inj Prev. 2010;11:353–60.
Trafton PG. Pelvic ring injuries. Surg Clin N Am. 1990;70(3):655–69.
Chong KH, DeCoster T, Osler T, Robinson B. Pelvic fractures and mortality. Iowa Orthop J. 1997;17:110–4.
Dalinka MK, Arger P, Coleman B. CT in pelvic trauma. Orthop Clin N Am. 1985;16:471–80.
Young JW, Burgess AR, Brumback RJ, Poka A. Pelvic fractures: value of plain radiography in early assessment and management. Radiology. 1986;160:445–51.
Wright JL, Nathens AB, Rivara FP, MacKenzie EJ, Wessells H. Specific fracture configurations predict sexual and excretory dysfunction in men and women 1 year after pelvic fracture. J Urol. 2006;176(4 Pt 1):1540–5.
Mears DC, Velyvis J. Surgical reconstruction of late pelvic posttraumatic nonunion and malalignment. J Bone Jt Surg Br. 2003;85(1):21–30.
Kanakaris NK, Angoules AG, Nikolaou VS, Kontakis G, Giannoudis PV. Treatment and outcomes of pelvic malunions and nonunions: a systematic review. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467(8):2112–24.
Oliver CW, Twaddle B, Agel J, Routt ML Jr. Outcome after pelvic ring fractures: evaluation using the medical outcomes short form SF36. Injury. 1996;27:635–41. doi:10.1016/S0020-1383(96)00100-3.
Taguchi T, Kawai S, Kaneko K, Yugue D. Surgical treatment of old pelvic fractures. Int Orthop. 2000;24:28–32.
Broos P, Vanderschot P, Craninx L, Rommens P. The operative treatment of unstable pelvic ring fractures. Int Surg. 1992;77:303–8.
Copeland CE, Bosse MJ, McCarthy ML, et al. Effect of trauma and pelvic fracture on female genitourinary, sexual, and reproductive function. J Orthop Trauma. 1997;11:73–81.
Vallier HA, Cureton BA, Schubeck D. Pregnancy outcomes after pelvic ring injury. J Orthop Trauma. 2012;26(5):302–7.
Schmal H, Markmiller M, Mehlhorn AT, Sudkamp NP. Epidemiology and outcome of complex pelvic injury. Acta Orthop Belg. 2005;71(1):41–7.
Reilly MC, Zinar DM, Matta JM. Neurologic injuries in pelvic ring fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;329:28–36.
Lindahl J, Hirvensalo E. Outcome of operatively treated type-C injuries of the pelvic ring. Acta Orthop. 2005;76(5):667–78.
Matta JM, Dickson KF, Markovich GD. Surgical treatment of pelvic nonunions and malunions. Clin Orthop. 1996;329:199–206.
Oransky M, Tortora M. Nonunions and malunions after pelvic fractures: why they occur and what can be done? Injury. 2007;38:489–96.
Vanderschot P, Daenens K, Broos P. Surgical treatment of posttraumatic pelvic deformities. Injury. 1998;29:19–22.
van den Bosch EW, van der Kleyn R, van Zwienen MC, van Vugt AB. Nonunion of unstable fractures of the pelvis. Eur J Trauma. 2002;28:100–3.
Rousseau MA, Laude F, Lazennec JY, Saillant G, Catonne Y. Two-stage surgical procedure for treating pelvic malunions. Int Orthop. 2006;30:338–41.
Pennal GF, Massiah KA. Nonunion and delayed union of fractures of the pelvis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1980;151:124–9.
Giannoudis PV, Psarakis S, Kanakaris NK, Pape HC. Biological enhancement of bone healing with bone morphogenetic protein-7 at the clinical setting of pelvic girdle non-unions. Injury. 2007;38(Suppl 4):S43–8.
Ebraheim NA, Biyani A, Wong F. Nonunion of pelvic fractures. J Trauma. 1998;44:202–4.
Conflict of interest
Tarun Goyal, Sujit Kumar Tripathy and Ramesh Kumar Sen declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical standard
This article has been prepared in compliance with ethics guidelines.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tripathy, S.K., Goyal, T. & Sen, R.K. Nonunions and malunions of the pelvis. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 41, 335–342 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-014-0461-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-014-0461-0