Abstract
Background
Recent consensus on variant angina defines significant spasm as total or subtotal occlusion of a coronary artery. However, the clinical significance of “less-than-subtotal” spasm needs to be reappraised, especially if the coronary spasm is combined with chest pain. Therefore, we evaluated the feasibility of left ventricular end diastolic pressure (LVEDP) as a tool to detect myocardial ischemia during ergonovine provocation testing.
Methods
After achieving two access sites, 29 patients underwent successful LVEDP monitoring using 5-Fr pigtail catheters during ergonovine provocation tests. Patients were divided into two groups based on the occurrence of anginal symptoms.
Results
Of the 29 patients, 16 (55 %) patients had anginal symptoms. LVEDP was significantly increased in the symptomatic group compared with the nonsymptomatic group (∆LVEDP 5.6 ± 4.2 vs. 1.2 ± 2.0 mmHg, p = 0.002). However, of the 16 patients with anginal symptoms, positive provocation test results were confirmed in only six patients (38 %) as per the traditional standard (> 90 % inducible spasm of the epicardial coronary artery).
Conclusion
Compared with the traditional standard, LVEDP may have advantages in terms of elucidating anginal symptoms in patients suspected of having coronary vasospasm when performing ergonovine provocation tests.
Zusammenfassung
Hintergrund
Im bestehenden Konsensus zur vasospastischen Angina (Prinzmetal-/Variant-Angina) wird ein signifikanter Spasmus als totale oder subtotale Okklusion einer Koronararterie definiert. Doch die klinische Bedeutung eines „weniger als subtotalen“ Koronarspasmus sollte neu bewertet werden, vor allem, wenn er mit thorakalen Schmerzen einhergeht. Daher wurde die Eignung des linksventrikulären enddiastolischen Drucks (LVEDP) als Tool für die Detektion einer Myokardischämie während eines Provokationstests mit Ergonovin (Ergometrin) evaluiert.
Methoden
Nach Erreichen zweier Zugänge war das LVEDP-Monitoring mittels 5-F-Pigtail-Kathetern während eines Ergonovin-Provokationstests bei 29 Patienten erfolgreich.
Ergebnisse
Anhand des Auftretens von Symptomen wurden die Patienten in 2 Gruppen eingeteilt, 16 (55 %) der 29 Patienten hatten pektanginöse Beschwerden. Der LVEDP war in der Gruppe mit Symptomatik signifikant höher als in der Gruppe ohne (LVEDP 5,6 ± 4,2 vs. 1,2 ± 2,0 mmHg, p = 0,002). Doch von den 16 Patienten mit pektanginösen Beschwerden wurde der positive Provokationstest bei nur 6 (38 %) als dem traditionellen Standard (> 90 % des induzierbaren Spasmus bei der epikardialen Koronararterie) entsprechend bestätigt.
Schlussfolgerungen
Verglichen mit dem traditionellen Standard könnte die LVEDP-Bestimmung Vorteile bieten im Zusammenhang mit der Aufklärung pektanginöser Symptome bei Verdacht auf einen Koronarspasmus unter Ergonovin-Provokation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Prinzmetal M, Kennamer R, Merliss R, Wada T, Bor N (1959) Angina pectoris. I. A variant form of angina pectoris; preliminary report. Am J Med 27:375–388
Maseri A, Mimmo R, Chierchia S, Marchesi C, Pesola A, L’Abbate A (1975) Coronary artery spasm as a cause of acute myocardial ischemia in man. Chest 68:625–633
JCS Joint Working Group (2010) Guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of patients with vasospastic angina (coronary spastic angina) (JCS (2008) digest version. Circ J 74:1745–1762
Hauser AM, Gangadharan V, Ramos RG, Gordon S, Timmis GC (1985) Sequence of mechanical, electrocardiographic and clinical effects of repeated coronary artery occlusion in human beings: echocardiographic observations during coronary angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol 5:193–197
Werner GS, Sold G, Teichmann D, Andreas S, Kreuzer H, Wiegand V (1990) Impaired relationship between Doppler echocardiographic parameters of diastolic function and left ventricular filling pressure during acute ischemia. Am Heart J 120:63–72
Cannon RO 3rd, Leon MB, Watson RM, Rosing DR, Epstein SE (1985) Chest pain and “normal” coronary arteries-role of small coronary arteries. Am J Cardiol 55:50B–60B
Lansky AJ, Dangas G, Mehran R, Desai KJ, Mintz GS, Wu H, Fahy M, Stone GW, Waksman R, Leon MB (2002) Quantitative angiographic methods for appropriate end-point analysis, edge-effect evaluation, and prediction of recurrent restenosis after coronary brachytherapy with gamma irradiation. J Am Coll Cardiol 39:274–280
Curry RC Jr, Pepine CJ, Sabom MB, Feldman RL, Christie LG, Varnell JH, Conti CR (1978) Hemodynamic and myocardial metabolic effects of ergonovine in patients with chest pain. Circulation 58:648–654
Heupler FA, Proudfit WL, Razavi M, Shirey EK, Greenstreet R, Sheldon WC (1978) Ergonovine maleate provocative test for coronary arterial spasm. Am J Cardiol 41:631–639
Bertrand ME, Lablanche JM, Tilmant PY (1980) Use of provocative testing in angina pectoris. Herz 5:65–71
Magder SA, Johnstone DE, Huckell VF, Adelman AG (1981) Experience with ergonovine provocative testing for coronary arterial spasm. Chest 79:638–646
Schroeder JS, Bolen JL, Quint RA, Clark DA, Hayden WG, Higgins CB, Wexler L (1977) Provocation of coronary spasm with ergonovine maleate. New test with results in 57 patients undergoing coronary arteriography. Am J Cardiol 40:487–491
Gravino FN, Perloff JK, Yeatman LA, Ippolitti AF (1981) Coronary arterial spasm versus esophageal spasm. Response to ergonovine. Am J Med 70:1293–1296
Tonino PA, De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, Siebert U, Ikeno F, van’ t Veer M, Klauss V, Manoharan G, Engstrøm T, Oldroyd KG, Ver Lee PN, MacCarthy PA, Fearon WF, FAME Study Investigators (2009) Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med 360:213–224
Nesto RW, Kowalchuk GJ (1987) The ischemic cascade: temporal sequence of hemodynamic, electrocardiographic and symptomatic expressions of ischemia. Am J Cardiol 59:23C–30C
Feldman RL, Hill JA, Whittle JL, Conti CR, Pepine CJ (1983) Electrocardiographic changes with coronary artery spasm. Am Heart J 106:1288–1297
Gertz EW, Wisneski JA, Neese R, Houser A, Korte R, Bristow JD (1980) Myocardial lactate extraction: multi-determined metabolic function. Circulation 61:256–261
Wiener L, Kasparian H, Duca PR, Walinsky P, Gottlieb RS, Hanckel F, Brest AN (1976) Spectrum of coronary arterial spasm. Clinical, angiographic and myocardial metabolic experience in 29 cases. Am J Cardiol 38:945–955
Distante A, Picano E, Moscarelli E, Palombo C, Benassi A, L’abbate A (1985) Echocardiographic versus hemodynamic monitoring during attacks of variant angina pectoris. Am J Cardiol 55:1319–1322
Song JK, Park SW, Kang DH, Hong MK, Kim JJ, Lee CW, Park SJ (2000) Safety and clinical impact of ergonovine stress echocardiography for diagnosis of coronary vasospasm. J Am Coll Cardiol 35:1850–1856
Hamilton KK, Pepine CJ (2000) A renaissance of provocative testing for coronary spasm? J Am Coll Cardiol 35:1857–1859
Iskandrian AS, Segal BL, Hakki AH (1981) Left ventricular end-diastolic pressure in evaluating left ventricular function. Clin Cardiol 4:28–33
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
H.-J. Jang, T.-H. Kim, S. W. Kwon, J.-Y. Kim, J. S. Kim, H. J. Lee, J. S. Park, R. K. Choi, Y. J. Choi and W.-H. Shim state that there are no conflicts of interest.
All studies on humans described in the present manuscript were carried out with the approval of the responsible ethics committee and in accordance with national law and the Helsinki Declaration of 1975 (in its current, revised form). Informed consent was obtained from all patients included in studies.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jang, HJ., Kim, TH., Kwon, S. et al. Left ventricular end diastolic pressure for detection of intracoronary ergonovine-induced myocardial ischemia. Herz 41, 320–325 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00059-015-4368-2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00059-015-4368-2
Keywords
- Variant angina
- Vasospastic angina
- Myocardial ischemia
- Left ventricular end diastolic pressure
- Ergonovine provocation test