Skip to main content
Log in

The role of the hyporheic zone for a benthic fish in an intermittent river: a refuge, not a graveyard

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Aquatic Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In lotic systems, the hyporheic zone has been suggested as a potential refuge for aquatic organisms during disturbances (hyporheic refuge hypothesis). However, the supporting evidence is unclear, especially regarding the survival of hyporheic refugees and their contribution to the recovery of post-disturbance populations. Moreover, few studies have focused on the importance of the hyporheic refuge for aquatic vertebrates such as fish. In this study, we present evidence that the hyporheic zone acts as a refuge for a small benthic fish (Cobitis shikokuensis) following surface drying in an intermittent river. We examined its survival during and recolonization after dry periods by direct hyporheic sampling and mark-and-recapture surveys. When the streambed dried, hyporheic sampling was conducted 58 times across 33 locations in the intermittent reach and 31 individuals of C. shikokuensis were captured from extracted hyporheic water. Mark-and-recapture surveys revealed that recolonizers after re-wetting included C. shikokuensis individuals that had survived dry periods in the hyporheic refuge. The condition factor of C. shikokuensis significantly declined after dry periods, suggesting that most recolonizers suffered from physiological stress, probably within the hyporheic refuge. These results clearly support the long-debated, hyporheic refuge hypothesis, and provide a striking example of the critical role of the hyporheic zone in population maintenance of lotic organisms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amoros C, Bornette G (2002) Connectivity and biocomplexity in waterbodies of riverine floodplains. Freshw Biol 47:761–776. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2427.2002.00905.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benstead JP, March JG, Pringle CM, Scatena FN (1999) Effects of a low-head dam and water abstraction on migratory tropical stream biota. Ecol Appl 9:656–668. doi:10.1890/1051-0761(1999)009[0656:EOALHD]2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berryman AA, Hawkins BA (2006) The refuge as an integrating concept in ecology and evolution. Oikos 115:192–196. doi:10.1111/j.0030-1299.2006.15188.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boulton AJ, Findlay S, Marmonier P, Stanley EH, Valett HM (1998) The functional significance of the hyporheic zone in streams and rivers. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 29:59–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunke M, Gonser T (1997) The ecological significance of exchange processes between rivers and groundwater. Freshw Biol 37:1–33. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2427.1997.00143.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clinton SM, Grimm NB, Fisher SG (1996) Response of a hyporheic invertebrate assemblage to drying disturbance in a desert stream. J N Am Benthol Soc 15:700–712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davey AJH, Kelly DJ, Biggs BJF (2006) Refuge-use strategies of stream fishes in response to extreme low flows. J Fish Biol 69:1047–1059. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8649.2006.01180.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delucchi CM (1989) Movement patterns of invertebrates in temporary and permanent streams. Oecologia 78:199–207. doi:10.1007/BF00377156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dole-Olivier M-J (2011) The hyporheic refuge hypothesis reconsidered: a review of hydrological aspects. Mar Freshw Res 62:1281–1302. doi:10.1071/MF11084

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dole-Olivier M-J, Marmonier P, Beffy J-L (1997) Response of invertebrates to lotic disturbance: is the hyporheic zone a patchy refugium? Freshw Biol 37:257–276. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2427.1997.00140.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dôtu Y, Mito S (1955) Life history of a gobioid fish, Sicydium japonicum Tanaka. Sci Bull Fac Agric Kyushu Univ 15:213–221 (in Japanese with English summary)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandes CC (1997) Lateral migration of fishes in Amazon floodplains. Ecol Freshw Fish 6:36–44. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0633.1997.tb00140.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hiramatsu K, Hosoya K (2007) Distribution and habitat of the Ajime-loach, Niwaella delicata, in the Ai River, Osaka Prefecture, Japan. Jpn J Ichthyol 53:39–46 (in Japanese with English abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  • Inoue M, Miyayoshi M (2006) Fish foraging effects on benthic assemblages along a warm-temperate stream: differences among drift feeders, benthic predators and grazers. Oikos 114:95–107. doi:10.1111/j.2006.0030-1299.14388.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Junk WJ, Bayley PB, Sparks RE (1989) The flood pulse concept in river-floodplain systems. In: Dodge DP (ed) Proceedings of the international large river symposium, vol 106. Canadian special publication of fisheries and aquatic sciences, Canada, pp 110–127

  • Jurajda P, Rulík M (2001) Occurrence of stone loach in the hyporheic zone. Folia Zool 50:239–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Kawanishi R, Kudo Y, Inoue M (2010) Habitat use by spinous loach (Cobitis shikokuensis) in southwestern Japan: importance of subsurface interstices. Ecol Res 25:837–845. doi:10.1007/s11284-010-0714-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kawanishi R, Inoue M, Takagi M, Miyake Y, Shimizu T (2011) Habitat factors affecting the distribution and abundance of the spinous loach Cobitis shikokuensis in southwestern Japan. Ichthyol Res 58:202–208. doi:10.1007/s10228-011-0208-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwak TJ (1988) Lateral movement and use of floodplain habitat by fishes of the Kankakee River, Illinois. Am Midl Nat 120:241–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Labbe TR, Fausch KD (2000) Dynamics of intermittent stream habitat regulate persistence of a threatened fish at multiple scales. Ecol Appl 10:1774–1791. doi:10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[1774:DOISHR]2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lake PS (2000) Disturbance, patchiness, and diversity in streams. J N Am Benthol Soc 19:573–592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magoulick DD (2000) Spatial and temporal variation in fish assemblages of dry stream pools: the role of abiotic and biotic factors. Aquat Ecol 34:29–41. doi:10.1023/A:1009914619061

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthaei CD, Arbuckle CJ, Townsend CR (2000) Stable surface stones as refugia for invertebrate during disturbance in a New Zealand stream. J N Am Benthol Soc 19:82–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDowall RM (1996) Diadromy and the assembly and restoration of riverine fish communities: a downstream view. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 62:1540–1552. doi:10.1139/f95-261

    Google Scholar 

  • Negishi JN, Inoue M, Nunokawa M (2002) Effects of channelisation on stream habitat in relation to a spate and flow refugia for macro invertebrates in northern Japan. Freshw Biol 47:1515–1529. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2427.2002.00877.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsen DA, Townsend CR (2005) Flood effects on invertebrates, sediments and particulate organic matter in the hyporheic zone of a gravel-bed stream. Freshw Biol 50:839–853. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2427.2005.01365.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orghidan T (1959) Ein neuer lebenstaum des unterirdischen Wassers, der hyporheische Biotop. Arch Hydrobiol 55:392–414

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer MA, Bely AE, Berg KE (1992) Response of invertebrates to lotic disturbance: a test of the hyporheic refuge hypothesis. Oecologia 89:182–194. doi:10.1007/BF00317217

    Google Scholar 

  • Poff NL, Ward JV (1989) Implications of streamflow variability and predictability for lotic community structure: a regional analysis of streamflow patterns. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 46:1805–1818. doi:10.1139/f89-228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rempel LL, Richardson JS, Healey MC (1999) Flow refugia for benthic macroinvertebrates during flooding of a large river. J N Am Benthol Soc 18:34–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz JS, Herricks EE (2005) Fish use of stage-specific fluvial habitats as refuge patches during a flood in a low-gradient Illinois stream. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 62:1540–1552. doi:10.1139/f05-060

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sedell JR, Reeves GH, Hauer FR, Stanford JA, Hawkins CP (1990) Role of refugia in recovery from disturbances: modern fragmented and disconnected river systems. Environ Manag 14:711–724. doi:10.1007/BF02394720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shimizu T (2002) Life history of a Japanese spinous loach, Cobitis takatsuensis, in Shikoku Island. Jpn J Ichthyol 49:33–40 (in Japanese with English abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley EH, Buschman DL, Boulton AJ, Grimm NB, Fisher SG (1994) Invertebrate resistance and resilience to intermittency in a desert stream. Am Midl Nat 131:288–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stegman JL, Minckley WL (1959) Occurrence of three species of fishes in interstices of gravel in an area of subsurface flow. Copeia 1959:341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stubbington R (2012) The hyporheic zone as an invertebrate refuge: a review of variability in space, time, taxa and behavior. Mar Freshw Res 63:293–311. doi:10.1071/MF11196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stubbington R, Wood PJ, Reid I (2011) Spatial variability in the hyporheic zone refugium of temporary streams. Aquat Sci 73:499–511. doi:10.1007/s00027-011-0203-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Townsend CR (1989) The patch dynamics concept of stream community ecology. J N Am Benthol Soc 8:6–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vannote RL, Minshall GW, Cummins KW, Sedell JR, Cushing CE (1980) The river continuum concept. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 37:130–137. doi:10.1139/f80-017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward JV (1989) The four-dimensional nature of lotic ecosystems. J N Am Benthol Soc 8:2–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams DD, Hynes HBN (1974) The occurrence of benthos deep in the substratum of a stream. Freshw Biol 4:233–256. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2427.1974.tb00094.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wootton RJ (1998) Ecology of teleost fishes, 2nd edn. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank T. W. Miller, K. Nakashima, H. Nakano, T. Sakai, T. Shimizu, K. Omori, and H. Onishi for technical advice and A. Kato, S. Suekuni, R. Tagashira, Y. Shiota for their field assistance. We also thank two reviewers for helpful comments that greatly improved the manuscript. This work was supported by Grants-in-Aid for JSPS Fellows (23·9280 to R.K.) and for Young Scientists (B) (22710237 to Y.M.) and partly by the Environment Research and Technology Development Fund (S9) of the Ministry of the Environment, Japan.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Kawanishi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kawanishi, R., Inoue, M., Dohi, R. et al. The role of the hyporheic zone for a benthic fish in an intermittent river: a refuge, not a graveyard. Aquat Sci 75, 425–431 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00027-013-0289-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00027-013-0289-4

Keywords

Navigation