Skip to main content
Log in

Temporal patterns in macrograzer effects on epilithic algae and meiofauna: a comparative approach to test for single species and whole grazer community effects

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Aquatic Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Within the shallow littoral zones of lakes, periphyton is an essential component, representing an important source of primary production and a food resource for herbivores. Periphytic communities are abundantly inhabited by meiofaunal organisms, which are mostly dominated by nematodes. During the last 3 decades, consumer–resource interactions between herbivore consumers and periphytic components (mainly algae) have been intensively studied. Although whole grazer community and single species effects on periphyton are known from field and laboratory experiments, the importance of single, dominant grazer taxa in direct comparison to whole community impacts is unknown. To investigate the continuity of grazing effects of a single, dominant macrograzer (Theodoxus fluviatilis, Gastropoda, Prosobranchia) on epilithic meiofauna and algae with respect to the whole grazer community, a temporally structured field experiment was carried out in Lake Erken (Sweden). Grazer impacts on periphytic algae and meiofauna were tested by controlling macrograzer access to littoral periphyton communities for 8 weeks in an exclosure/enclosure experimental design. Overall, the results showed macrograzer presence to have temporally constant, strongly negative effects on algal biomass as well as meiofaunal abundance and community composition. Moreover, T. fluviatilis alone accounted for up to 80% of the grazing effects, indicative of their ability to regulate periphytic communities in lakes. The present study yields new insights into the effects of a single grazer species and stressed temporal patterns of consumer–resource interactions in freshwater lakes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson MJ (2001) A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Austral Ecol 26:32–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson MJ, Gorley RN, Clarke KR (2008) PERMANOVA + for PRIMER: guide to software and statistical methods. PRIMER-E Ltd., Plymouth

    Google Scholar 

  • Balvanera P, Pfisterer AB, Buchmann N, He JS, Nakashizuka T, Raffaelli D, Schmid B (2006) Quantifying the evidence for biodiversity effects on ecosystem functioning and services. Ecol Lett 9:1146–1156

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beier S, Bolley M, Traunspurger W (2004) Predator–prey interactions between Dugesia gonocephala and free-living nematodes. Freshw Biol 49:77–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell SS (1980) Meiofauna–Macrofauna interactions in a high salt marsh habitat. Ecol Monogr 50:487–505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borchardt MA, Bott TL (1995) Meiofaunal grazing of bacteria and algae in a piedmont stream. J North Am Benthol Soc 14:278–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bott TL (1996) Algae in microscopic food webs. In: Stevenson RJ, Bothwell ML, Lowe RL (eds) Algal ecology: freshwater benthic ecosystems. Aquatic ecology. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, pp 574–608

    Google Scholar 

  • Bott TL, Borchardt MA (1999) Grazing of protozoa, bacteria, and diatoms by meiofauna in lotic epibenthic communities. J North Am Benthol Soc 18:499–513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown KM, Carman KR, Inchausty V (1994) Density-dependent influences on feeding and metabolism in a fresh-water snail. Oecologia 99:158–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgmer T, Reiss J, Wickham SA, Hillebrand H (2010) Effects of snail grazers and light on the benthic microbial food web in periphyton communities. Aquat Microb Ecol 61:163–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cardinale BJ, Srivastava DS, Duffy JE, Wright JP, Downing AL, Sankaran M, Jouseau C (2006) Effects of biodiversity on the functioning of trophic groups and ecosystems. Nature 443:989–992

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cattaneo A, Mousseau B (1995) Empirical analysis of removal rate of periphyton by grazers. Oecologia 103:249–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke KR (1993) Nonparametric multivariate analyses of changes in community structure. Aust J Ecol 18:117–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coull BC (1990) Are members of the meiofauna food for higher trophic levels. Trans Am Microsc Soc 109:233–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeNicola DM, McIntire CD (1991) Effects of hydraulic refuge and irradiance on grazer–periphyton interactions in laboratory streams. J North Am Benthol Soc 10:251–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeNicola DM, McIntire CD, Lamberti GA, Gregory SV, Ashkenas LR (1990) Temporal patterns of grazer–periphyton interactions in laboratory streams. Freshw Biol 23:475–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diaz Villanueva V, Albarino R, Modenutti B (2004) Grazing impact of two aquatic invertebrates on periphyton from an Andean-Patagonian stream. Arch Hydrobiol 159:455–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feminella JW, Hawkins CP (1995) Interactions between stream herbivores and periphyton: a quantitative analysis of past experiments. J North Am Benthol Soc 14:465–509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart DD (1992) Community organization in streams—the importance of species interactions, physical factors, and chance. Oecologia 91:220–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hertonsson P, Abjornsson K, Bronmark C (2008) Competition and facilitation within and between a snail and a mayfly larva and the effect on the grazing process. Aquat Ecol 42:669–677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillebrand H (2008) Grazing regulates the spatial variability of periphyton biomass. Ecology 89:165–173

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hillebrand H (2009) Meta-analysis of grazer control of periphyton biomass across aquatic ecosystems. J Phycol 45:798–806

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillebrand H, Kahlert M (2001) Effect of grazing and nutrient supply on periphyton biomass and nutrient stoichiometry in habitats of different productivity. Limnol Oceanogr 46:1881–1898

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hillebrand H, Matthiessen B (2009) Biodiversity in a complex world: consolidation and progress in functional biodiversity research. Ecol Lett 12:1405–1419

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hillebrand H, Kahlert M, Haglund AL, Berninger UG, Nagel S, Wickham S (2002) Control of microbenthic communities by grazing and nutrient supply. Ecology 83:2205–2219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holomuzki JR, Feminella JW, Power ME (2010) Biotic interactions in freshwater benthic habitats. J North Am Benthol Soc 29:220–244

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooper DU, Chapin FS, Ewel JJ, Hector A, Inchausti P, Lavorel S, Lawton JH, Lodge DM, Loreau M, Naeem S, Schmid B, Setala H, Symstad AJ, Vandermeer J, Wardle DA (2005) Effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning: a consensus of current knowledge. Ecol Monogr 75:3–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonsson M, Malmqvist B (2000) Ecosystem process rate increases with animal species richness: evidence from leaf-eating, aquatic insects. Oikos 89:519–523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonsson M, Malmqvist B (2003) Importance of species identity and number for process rates within different stream invertebrate functional feeding groups. J Anim Ecol 72:453–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karouna NK, Fuller RL (1992) Influence of four grazers on periphyton communities associated with clay tiles and leaves. Hydrobiology 245:53–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamberti GA, Ashkenas LR, Gregory SV, Steinman AD (1987) Effects of three herbivores on periphyton communities in laboratory streams. J North Am Benthol Soc 6:92–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lancaster J, Robertson AL (1995) Microcrustacean prey and macroinvertebrate predators in a stream food-web. Freshw Biol 34:123–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liess A, Haglund AL (2007) Periphyton responds differentially to nutrients recycled in dissolved or faecal pellet form by the snail grazer T. fluviatilis. Freshw Biol 52:1997–2008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liess A, Hillebrand H (2004) Invited review: direct and indirect effects in herbivore periphyton interactions. Arch Hydrobiol 159:433–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCormick PV (1994) Evaluating the multiple mechanisms underlying herbivore algal interactions in streams. Hydrobiology 291:47–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCormick PV, Stevenson RJ (1989) Effects of snail grazing on benthic algal community structure in different nutrient environments. J North Am Benthol Soc 8:162–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulholland PJ, Steinman AD, Palumbo AV, Elwood JW, Kirschtel DB (1991) Role of nutrient cycling and herbivory in regulating periphyton communities in laboratory streams. Ecology 72:966–982

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Muschiol D, Markovic M, Threis I, Traunspurger W (2008) Predatory copepods can control nematode populations: a functional-response experiment with Eucyclops subterraneus and bacterivorous nematodes. Fundam Appl Limnol 172:317–324

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Neumann D (1961) Ernährungsbiologie einer rhipidoglossen Kiemenschnecke. Hydrobiology 17:133–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters L, Traunspurger W (2005) Species distribution of free-living nematodes and other meiofauna in littoral periphyton communities of lakes. Nematology 7:267–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters L, Hillebrand H, Traunspurger W (2007a) Spatial variation of grazer effects on epilithic meiofauna and algae. J North Am Benthol Soc 26:78–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters L, Wetzel MA, Traunspurger W, Rothhaupt KO (2007b) Epilithic communities in a lake littoral zone: the role of water-column transport and habitat development for dispersal and colonization of meiofauna. J North Am Benthol Soc 26:232–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Power ME (1992) Habitat heterogeneity and the functional-significance of fish in river food webs. Ecology 73:1675–1688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmid PE, Schmid-Araya JM (2002) Trophic relationships in temporary and permanent freshwater meiofauna. In: Rundle SD, Robertson A, Schmid-Araya JM (eds) Freshwater meiofauna. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, The Netherlands, pp 295–319

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmid-Araya JM, Schmid PE (2000) Trophic relationships: integrating meiofauna into a realistic benthic food web. Freshw Biol 44:149–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soluk DA (1993) Multiple predator effects: predicting combined functional-response of stream fish and invertebrate predators. Ecology 74:219–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinman AD (1996) Effects of grazers on freshwater benthic algae. In: Stevenson RJ, Bothwell ML, Lowe RL (eds) Algal ecology: freshwater benthic ecosystems. Aquatic ecology. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, pp 341–374

    Google Scholar 

  • Stich HB, Brinker A (2005) Less is better: uncorrected versus pheopigmentcorrected photometric chlorophyll-a estimation. Arch Hydrobiol 162:111–120

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Turner AM, Bernot RJ, Boes CM (2000) Chemical cues modify species interactions: the ecological consequences of predator avoidance by freshwater snails. Oikos 88:148–158

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Kurt Pettersson from the Erken laboratory for support during our field study. We are indebted to Helmut Hillebrand for help with field work and sampling, and to Christa and Karl Hillebrand for the construction of the cages. We thank Wendy Ran for editing the English. Two anonymous reviewers gave helpful comments that improved the manuscript considerably.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lars Peters.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Peters, L., Traunspurger, W. Temporal patterns in macrograzer effects on epilithic algae and meiofauna: a comparative approach to test for single species and whole grazer community effects. Aquat Sci 74, 229–240 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00027-011-0214-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00027-011-0214-7

Keywords

Navigation