Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Clinical results versus subjective improvement with anterior transposition in cubital tunnel syndrome

  • Published:
Advances in Therapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study was conducted to compare the results of anterior transposition methods and to determine the time needed to attain subjective well-being in patients with cubital tunnel syndrome. A total of 49 cases were retrospectively evaluated. Patients were called for follow-up, completed a questionnaire, and were reexamined. They were assigned to one of 3 groups: subcutaneous transposition (SCT), submuscular transposition (SMT), or intramuscular transposition (IMT). The McCowan classification and Wilson-Krout criteria were used for classification and outcomes assessments. Categorical variables were analyzed with the χ2 test, and metric variables by analysis of variance or through Kruskal-Wallis variance analysis. Improvement of at least 1 McCowan grade was observed in 87.63% of patients. The least responsive group was assigned a McCowan grade of III. The most effective procedure for resolving clawing was SMT. Clinical results were excellent in 26 patients (53.06%), good in 12 (24.48%), fair in 4 (8.16%), and poor in 7 (14.28%). At the latest follow-up, overall grip and pinch strength had improved by 23% and 34%, respectively, compared with the contralateral side. Thirty-six patients exhibited an improvement in grip power and 38 in fine dexterity. Complete resolution of numbness was observed in 32 patients, and complete resolution of pain was noted in 30 patients. The preoperative mean visual analog scale score of 6.82 improved to 3.36 postoperatively. Clawing improved in 4 patients and atrophy in 7. The mean time to subjective improvement was shortest in the SMT group and longest in the IMT group. The greatest pain relief was reported in the IMT group and the least in the SMT group. One case with IMT required reoperation because of recompression of the nerve. The most frequent complication in the SMT and IMT groups was muscular tenderness. In conclusion, SCT offers an alternative to other anterior transposition methods because of its simplicity and quicker recovery time, especially in mild to moderate cases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lowe JB III, Mackinnon SE. Management of secondary cubital tunnel syndrome.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;113:El-E16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Robertson C, Saratsiotis J. A review of compressive ulnar neuropathy at the elbow.J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2005;28:345.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Chuang DC, Treciak MA. Subfascial anterior transposition: a modified method for the treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome (CuTS).Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg. 1998;2:178–183.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Filippi R, Farag S, Reisch R, Grunert P, Bocher-Schwarz H. Cubital tunnel syndrome: treatment by decompression without transposition of ulnar nerve.Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 2002;45:164–168.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gervasio O, Gambardella G, Zaccone C, Branca D. Simple decompression versus anterior submuscular transposition of the ulnar nerve in severe cubital tunnel syndrome: a prospective randomized study.Neurosurgery. 2005;56:108–117.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Leone J, Bhandari M, Thoma A. Anterior intramuscular transposition with ulnar nerve decompression at the elbow.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;387:132–139.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Nabhan A, Ahlhelm F, Kelm J, Reith W, Schwerdtfeger K, Steudel WI. Simple decompression or subcutaneous anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve for cubital tunnel syndrome.J Hand Surg [Br]. 2005;30:521–524.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Osterman AL, Davis CA. Subcutaneous transposition of the ulnar nerve for treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome.Hand Clin. 1996;12:421–433.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Mowlavi A, Andrews K, Lille S, Verhulst S, Zook EG, Milner S. The management of cubital tunnel syndrome: a meta-analysis of clinical studies.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;106:327–334.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Posner MA. Compressive neuropathies of the ulnar nerve at the elbow and wrist.Instr Course Lect. 2000;49:305–317.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. McGowan AJ. The results of transposition of the ulnar nerve for traumatic ulnar neuritis.J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1950;32:293–301.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wilson DH, Krout R. Surgery of ulnar neuropathy at the elbow: 16 cases treated by decompression without transposition. Technical note.J Neurosurg. 1973;38:780–785.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Bimmler D, Meyer VE. Surgical treatment of the ulnar nerve entrapment neuropathy: submuscular anterior transposition or simple decompression of the ulnar nerve? Long-term results in 79 cases.Ann Chir Main Memb Super. 1996;15:148–157.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Dellon AL, Coert JH. Results of the musculofascial lengthening technique for submuscular transposition of the ulnar nerve at the elbow.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86(suppl 1):169–179.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kohut GN, Delia Santa DR, Chamay A. Ulnar nerve compression syndrome of the elbow: analysis of 50 operated cases [in French].Ann Chir Main Memb Super. 1996;15:138–147.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Matsuzaki H, Yoshizu T, Maki Y, Tsubokawa N, Yamamoto Y, Toishi S. Long-term clinical and neurologic recovery in the hand after surgery for severe cubital tunnel syndrome.J Hand Surg Am. 2004;29:373–378.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Gervasio O, Gambardella G. Anterior submuscular transposition of the ulnar nerve in severe cubital tunnel syndrome: personal experience.J Neurosurg Sci. 2004;48:113–116.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Posner MA. Submuscular transposition for the ulnar nerve at the elbow.Bull Hosp Jt Dis Orthop Inst. 1984;44:406–423.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kim DH, Han K, Tiel RL, Murovic JA, Kline DG. Surgical outcomes of 654 ulnar nerve lesions.J Neurosurg. 2003;98:993–1004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Huang JH, Samadani U, Zager EL. Ulnar nerve entrapment neuropathy at the elbow: simple decompression.Neurosurgery. 2004;55:1150–1153.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Pavelka M, Rhomberg M, Estermann D, Loscher WN, Piza-Katzer H. Decompression without anterior transposition: an effective minimally invasive technique for cubital tunnel syndrome.Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 2004;47:119–123.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Hashiguchi H, Ito H, Sawaizumi T. Stabilized subcutaneous transposition of the ulnar nerve.Int Orthop. 2003;27:232–234.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Caputo AE, Watson HK. Subcutaneous anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve for failed decompression of cubital tunnel syndrome.J Hand Surg Am. 2000;25:544–551.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Afyon Kocatepe University Faculty of Medicine, Afyonkarahisar, Turkey

    Kamil Çagri Köse, Sinan Adiyaman & Mehmet Demirtas

  2. Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Division of Hand and Upper Extremity Surgery, Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey

    Sinan Bilgin & Dervis Guner

  3. Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Gaziantep University Faculty of Medicine, Gaziantep, Turkey

    Oguz Cebesoy

  4. Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Afyon Kocatepe University Faculty of Medicine, Afyonkarahisar, Turkey

    Levent Altinel

  5. Department of Biostatistics, Turkey

    Beyza Doganay

Authors
  1. Kamil Çagri Köse
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sinan Bilgin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Oguz Cebesoy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Levent Altinel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Burak Akan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Dervis Guner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Beyza Doganay
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Sinan Adiyaman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Mehmet Demirtas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kamil Çagri Köse.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Köse, K.Ç., Bilgin, S., Cebesoy, O. et al. Clinical results versus subjective improvement with anterior transposition in cubital tunnel syndrome. Adv Therapy 24, 996–1005 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02877704

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02877704

Keywords

Search

Navigation