Abstract
In a retrospective analysis the results of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) treatment were evaluated in patients with renal stones according to calyceal localization of treated stones.
The 198 patients who underwent ESWL with the Dornier MPL 9000 were analyzed for success rate, complication rate, residual fragments, regrowth and recurrence rates. Totally 210 calyceal calculi located in different portions of the kidney have been comparatively evaluated.
No major complications were noted during or after ESWL. Some minor complications such as flank pain, renal colic, haematuria were observed. Flank pain was observed during ESWL treatment especially in patients with upper calyceal stones. Although stone-free and residual fragment rates were similar in pelvic, upper and middle calyces, patients with lower calyceal and pelvicalyceal stones had high residual fragment rate and lower stone-free rate. Patients with stones in the lower calyces or pelvicalyces had high recurrence and regrowth rates (p<0.05).
ESWL has been considered as the optimal treatment modality for most upper urinary tract calculi. It is especially effective in patients with pelvic, upper and middle calyceal stones. Patients with lower calyceal stones often failed to eliminate the fragments, hence had high recurrence and regrowth rates.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Beck, E. M., Riehle, R. A. Jr.: The fate of residual fragments after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy monotherapy of infection stones.J. Urol., 145, 6 (1991).
Drach, G. W., Dretler, S., Fair, W., Finlayson, B., Gillenwater, J., Griffith, D., Lingeman, J., Newman, D.: Report of the United States Cooperative Study of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.J. Urol., 135, 1127 (1986).
Fine, J. K., Pak, C. Y. C., Preminger, G. M.: Effect of medical management and residual fragments on recurrent stone formation following shock wave lithotripsy.J. Urol., 153, 27 (1995).
Graff, J., Diederichs, W., Schulze, H.: Long-term follow-up in 1003 extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsies in patients with multiple renal calculi based on stone burden and the location.J. Endourol., 2, 145 (1988).
Lidl, B., Jocham, D., Lunz, C., Schuster, C., Schmiedt, E.: Five-year followup of urinary stone patients treated with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.J. Endourol., 2, 157 (1988).
Lingeman, J. E., Newman, D., Mertz, J. H. O., Mosbaugh, P. G., Steele, R. E., Kahnoski, R. J., Coury, T. A., Woods, J. R.: Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: The Methodist Hospital of Indiana experience.J. Urol., 135, 1134 (1986).
Maggio, M. I., Nicely, E. R., Peppas, D. S., Gormley, T. S., Brown, C. E.: An evaluation of 646 stone patients treated on the HM4 extracorporeal shock wave lithotriptor.J. Urol., 148, 1114 (1992).
Riehle, R. A., Fair, W. R., Vaughan, E. D.: Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for upper urinary tract calculi. One year' experience at a single centre.JAMA, 255, 2043 (1986).
Schmiedt, E., Chaussy, C.: Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of kidney and ureteric stones.Urol. Int., 39, 193 (1984).
Tolon, M., Miroĝlu, C., Erol, H.: A report on extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy results on 1569 renal units in an outpatient clinic.J. Urol., 145, 695 (1991).
Yu, C. C., Lee, Y. H., Huang, J. K., Chen, M. T., Chen, K. K., Lin, A. T. L., Chang, S. L.: Long-term stone regrowth and recurrence rates after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.Br. J. Urol., 72, 688 (1993).
Zanetti, G., Montanari, E., Mandressi, A., Guarneri, A., Ceresoli, A., Mazza, L., Trinchieri, A., Pisani, E.: Long-term results of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in renal stone treatment.J. Endourol., 5, 61 (1991).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Koşar, A., Türkölmez, K., Sarica, K. et al. Calyceal stones: Fate of shock wave therapy with respect to stone localization. International Urology and Nephrology 30, 433–438 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02550222
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02550222