Skip to main content
Log in

Measuring returns to scale and technological change in co-operative banks: A provincial analysis of Canadian credit unions and caisses populaires

  • Published:
Empirical Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In Canada economies of scale in credit unions come not only from large single office arrangements but from external economies realized from belonging to central provincial credit unions. Making use of aggregate provincial time series and cross-sectional data, this study begins by employing a sequential Akaike's Information Criterion (AIC) test to select the most appropriate model. This procedure permits the isolation of economies of scale from technological change effects. For all provinces, economies of scale are discovered to be significantly different from 1, and for five of the eight provinces examined, technological change was statistically significant from zero. The larger the provincial organization, as illustrated by the Quebec caisses populaires, the higher we find estimates of returns to scale and technological change. An implication may be that both expansion and more centralization should be encouraged and that other provinces may be able to increase efficiency by imitating some of Quebec's operational and administrative practices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Akaike H (1973) Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In: Petrov BN, Csaki F (eds) Second International Symposium on Information Theory. Akademiai Kiado, Budapest

    Google Scholar 

  2. Amemiya T (1980) Selection of regressors. International Economic Review 21

  3. Benston GJ, Hanweck GA, Humphrey DB (1982) Scale economies in banking. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 14

  4. Chan MWL, Mountain DC (1983) Economies of scale and the Tornqvist discrete measure of productivity growth. Review of Economics and Statistics 65

  5. Statistics Canada (1969–1980) Credit Unions 61–209, Ottawa

  6. Flannery MJ (1974) An economic evaluation of Credit Unions in the United States. Research Report No. 54, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, Boston, Mass

    Google Scholar 

  7. Klein LR (1953) A textbook of econometrics. Row and Peterson, Evanston

    Google Scholar 

  8. Koot RS (1978) On economies of scale in Credit Unions. Journal of Finance 33

  9. Malinvaud E (1977) Statistical methods of econometrics. North-Holland, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mallows CL (1964) Choosing variables in a linear regression: A graphical aid. Presented at the Central Regional Meeting of the Institute of Mathematical Statistics, Manhattan, Kansas

  11. May JD, Denny M (1979) Factor-augmenting technical progress and productivity in U.S. manufacturing. International Economic Review 20

  12. Murray JD, White RW (1980) Economies of scale and deposit — taking financial institutions in Canada. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 12

  13. Murray JD, White RW (1983) Economies of scale and economies of scope in multi-product financial institutions: A study of British Columbia Credit Unions. Journal of Finance, 38

  14. Taylor R (1972) Economies of scale in large Credit Unions. Applied Economics 4

  15. Wolken JD, Navratil FJ (1980) Economies of scale in Credit Unions: Further evidence. Journal of Finance 35

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

We would like to thank Doug Brown and Alvin Lo for computational assistance.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chan, M.W.L., Mountain, D.C. Measuring returns to scale and technological change in co-operative banks: A provincial analysis of Canadian credit unions and caisses populaires. Empirical Economics 11, 207–222 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01977002

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01977002

Keywords

Navigation