Skip to main content
Log in

A content semantics for quantified relevant logics. I

  • Published:
Studia Logica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We present an algebraic-style of semantics, which we call a “content semantics”, for quantified relevant logics based on the weak system BBQ. We show soundness and completeness for all quantificational logics extending BBQ and also treat reduced modelling for all systems containing BB d Q. The key idea of content semantics is that true entailments AB are represented under interpretation I as content containments, i.e. I(A)I(B) (or, the content of A contains that of B). This is opposed to the truth-functional way which represents true entailments as truth-preservations over all set-ups (or worlds), i.e. (VaεK) (if I(A, a) = T then I(B, a)= T).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. R. Anderson and N. D. Belnap, Jr., Entailment, The Logic of Relevance and Necessity, Princeton U.P., 1975.

  2. R. T. Brady, The simple consistency of a set theory based on the logic CSQ, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, Vol. 24 (1983), pp. 431–449.

    Google Scholar 

  3. R. T. Brady, Depth relevance of some paraconsistent logics, Studia Logica, Vol. 43 (1984), pp. 63–73.

    Google Scholar 

  4. R. T. Brady, Natural deduction systems for some quantified relevant logics, Logique et Analyse, 27 Anńee, 1984, pp. 355–377.

    Google Scholar 

  5. R. T. Brady, The non-triviality of dialectical set theory, in G. Priest, R. Routley and J. Norman (eds.), Paraconsistent Logic, Essays on the Inconsistent, Philosophia Verlag, forthcoming in 1989.

  6. R. T. Brady, Universal Logic, in preparation.

  7. J. M. Dunn, The Algebra of Intensional Logics, Ph.D. Thesis, Uni. of Pittsburgh, 1966.

  8. K. Fine, Models for entailment, Journal of Philosophical Logic, Vol. 3 (1974), pp. 347–372.

    Google Scholar 

  9. K. Fine, Incompleteness of quantified relevance logics, in R. Sylvan (ed.), Directions in Relevant Logics, forthcoming in 1988.

  10. K. Fine, Semantics for quantified relevance logic, typescript, 1985.

  11. D. Gabbay, On 2nd order intuitionistic propositional calculus with full comprehension, Archiv für Mathematische Logik, Vol. 16 (1974), pp. 177–186.

    Google Scholar 

  12. P. Halmos, Algebraic Logic, Chelsea, New York, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  13. L. Henkin, The completeness of the first-order functional calculus, in J. Hintikka (ed.), The Philosophy of Mathematics, Oxford U.P., 1969, pp. 51–63.

  14. L. Henkin, J. D. Monk and A. Tarski, Cylindrical Algebras, North-Holland, 1971.

  15. P. S. Lavers, Generating Intensional Logics, M. A. Thesis, University of Adelaide, 1985.

  16. R. K. Meyer and R. Routley, Algebraic analysis of Entailment I, Logique et Analyse, Vol. 15 (1972), pp. 407–428.

    Google Scholar 

  17. R. K. Meyer and R. Routley, Algebraic analysis of Entailment II, typescript, 1973.

  18. R. K. Meyer, J. M. Dunn and H. Leblanc, Completeness of relevant quantification theories, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, Vol. 15 (1974), pp. 97–121.

    Google Scholar 

  19. G. Priest, Sense, Entailment and Modus Porens, Journal of Philosophical Logic, Vol. 9 (1980), pp. 415–435.

    Google Scholar 

  20. H. Rasiowa and R. Sikorski, The Mathematics of Metamathematics, Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe, Warsaw, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  21. R. Routley and R. K. Meyer, The semantics of entailment, in H. Leblanc (ed.), Truth, Syntax and Modality, North-Holland, 1973, pp. 199–243.

  22. R. Routley, R. K. Meyer, V. Plumwood and R. T. Brady, Relevant Logics and their Rivals, Vol. 1, Ridgeview, California, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This paper was presented to the Australasian Association for Logic Conference, held at the University of Auckland from 9–12th July, 1986. I wish to thank those present for some helpful comments. I also wish to thank Kit Fine for some useful discussion on some topics of this paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brady, R.T. A content semantics for quantified relevant logics. I. Stud Logica 47, 111–127 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00370286

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00370286

Keywords

Navigation