Abstract
In a paper published in Social Indicators Research in 1975, Levy and Guttman proved the proposition that wellbeing is a special case of attitude. They exploited this result for establishing a certain lawfulness for wellbeing behavior, and built on this for revealing more specialized features of the lawfulness. Five years later in this same journal, Andrews and McKennell published two papers on exactly the same proposition, but without proving it, without building on known relevant lawfulness of attitudinal behavior, and without mentioning (neither positively nor negatively) the Levy-Guttman work. The Andrews-McKennell papers are shown to be a retrogression rather than a scientific advance, being conceptually confused, using inappropriate data analysis, and dealing with arbitrary assumptions which are either untested, untestable or false.
Similar content being viewed by others
Bibliography
AndrewsF. M.: 1974, ‘Social indicators of perceived life quality’, Social Indicators Research 1, pp. 279–299.
AndrewsF. M. and McKennellA. C.: 1980, ‘Measures of self-reported wellbeing: Their affective, cognitive and other components’, Social Indicators Research 8, pp. 127–155.
BentlerP. M.: 1980, ‘Multivariate analysis with latent variables: Causal modeling’, Annual Reviews Psychology 31, pp. 419–456.
BradburnN. M.: 1969, The Structure of Psychological Wellbeing (Aldine Publishing Company, Chicago).
BradburnN. M. and CaplovitzP.: 1965, Reports on Happiness (Aldine Publishing Company, Chicago).
GratchH. (ed.): 1973, Twenty-five Years of Social Research in Israel (Jerusalem Academic Press, Jerusalem).
GuttmanL.: 1950, ‘The problem of attitude and opinion measurement’, in Stouffer et al., Measurement and Prediction (Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.).
GuttmanL.: 1959, ‘A structural theory for intergroup beliefs and action’, American Sociological Review 24, pp. 318–328.
GuttmanL.: 1977, ‘What is not what in statistics’, The Statistician 26, pp. 81–107; also in Borg, I. (ed.): 1981, Multidimensional Data Representations: When and Why (Mathesis Press, Ann Arbor), pp. 20–46.
GuttmanL.: 1981, ‘What is not what in theory construction’, in R. M.Hauser, D.Mechanic, and A.Haller (eds.), Social Structure and Personality; also in Borg, I. (ed.): 1981, Multidimensional Data Representations: When and Why (Mathesis Press, Ann Arbor), pp. 47–64.
JordanJ. E.: 1978, ‘Facet theory and the study of behavior’, in S.Shye (ed.), Theory Construction and Data Analysis in the Behavioral Sciences (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco), pp. 192–209.
LevyS., 1981, ‘Lawful roles of facets in social theories’, in BorgI. (ed.), Multidimensional data representations: When and Why (Mathesis Press, Ann Arbor).
LevyS. and L.Guttman: 1975, ‘On the multivariate structure of wellbeing’, Social Indicators Research 2, pp. 361–388.
McKennellA. C. and AndrewsF. M.: 1980, ‘Models of cognition and affect in perceptions of well-being’, Social Indicators Research 8, pp. 257–298.
OstromT. M.: 1969, ‘The relationship between the affective, behavioral, and cognitive components of attitude’, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 5, pp. 12–30.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Guttman, L., Levy, S. On the definition and varieties of attitude and wellbeing. Soc Indic Res 10, 159–174 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00302508
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00302508