Abstract
Traditional shunts were primarily designed to manage hydrocephalus by regulating intracranial pressure. However, in some circumstances, their performance characteristics can cause them to underdrain or overdrain CSF. Overdrainage has been linked with clinical complications such as valve-dependent shunt syndrome, cranial stenosis, slit-ventricle syndrome, and subdural hematomas, and it may contribute to ventricular catheter occlusion. In addition to complications associated with hypertension and ventriculomegaly, underdrainage has been linked with residual brain edema, and subcutaneous CSF effusion has been observed at the site of cranial perforation, mainly in pediatric patients. Newer designs attempt to reduce these complications, but fall short for various reasons. The author presents a new shunt design, which utilizes variable aperture technology (patent pending) that results in the physiologic regulation of CSF flow under both positive and negative pressure conditions. This new design offers encouragement for the management of hydrocephalus and the prevention of complications due to overdrainage.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Choux M, Genitori L, Lang D (1992) Shunt implantation: reducing the incidence of shunt infections. J Neurosurg 77:875–880
Da Silva MC, Drake JM (1990–1991) Effect of subcutaneous implantation of anti-siphon devices on CSF shunt function. Pediatr Neurosurg 17:197–202
Di Rocco C, Marchese E, Velardi F (1994) A survey of the first complication of newly implanted CSF shunt devices for the treatment of nontumoral hydrocephalus. Child's Nerv Syst 10:321–327
Drake JM, et al (1993) Functional obstruction of an antisiphon device by raised tissue capsule pressure. Neurosurgery 32:137–139
Faulhauer K, Schmitz P (1987) Overdrainage phenomena in shunt treated hydrocephalus. Acta Neurochir 45:89–101
Hoffman HJ (1982) Technical problems of shunts. Monogr Neural Sci 8:158–169
Itoh K, Matsumae M, Tsugane R, Sato O (1989) The shunt flow in programmable pressure valve. Nerv Syst Child 14:143–148
Kremer P, Aschoff A, Kunze S (1994) Risks of using siphon-reducing devices. Child's Nerv Syst 10:231–235
Portnoy HD, Schulte RR, Fox JL, Croissant PD (1973) Anti-siphon and reversible occlusion valves for shunting in hydrocephalus and preventing post-shunt subdural hematomas. J Neurosurg 38:729–738
Pudenz RH, Foltz EL (1991) Hydrocephalus: overdrainage by ventricular shunts. Surg Neurol 35:200–212
Quigley MR, Reigel DH (1991) Cerebrospinal fluid shunt infections. Neurosci J 16–20
Sainte-Rose C, Hooven MD, Hirsch JF (1987) A new approach in the treatment of hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg 66:213–226
Sainte-Rose C, Hoffman HJ, Hirsch JF (1989) Shunt failure. Concepts Pediatr Neurosurg 9:7–20
Stein SC (1982) Siphoning in shunts —does it exist? AANS, Honolulu
Tokoro K, Chiba Y (1991) Optimum position for an antisiphon device in a cerebrospinal fluid shunt system. Neurosurgery 29:519–525
Weiner HL, Constantini S, Wisoff JH (1994) Normal pressure hydrocephalus: comparison of Orbis Sigma and Differential Pressure valves. AANS 62nd Annual Meeting 1994, Scientific program, p 384
Will BE, Muller-Korbsch U, Buchholz R (1994) Experience with the programmable Sophy SU8 valve. Child's Nerv Syst 10:476
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Paes, N. A new self-adjusting flow-regulating device for shunting of CSF. Child's Nerv Syst 12, 619–625 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00261658
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00261658