Skip to main content
Log in

Telementoring of laparoscopic procedures

Initial clinical experience

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background: To assess the feasibility of telementoring, a clinical telepresence system was developed.

Methods: Telementoring was attempted in 14 advanced and 9 basic urologic laparoscopic procedures. The remote surgeon located in a control room (>1,000 feet from operating room) supervised an inexperienced surgeon. Mentoring was accomplished with real-time video images, two-way audio communication, a robotic arm used to control the videoendoscope, and a telestrator. The patient outcome, complications, and operative time were assessed and compared to patients undergoing matched procedures in which the experienced surgeon was working side by side with the primary surgeon.

Results: The overall telementoring success rate was 95.6% (22/23 cases) with no increase in complications. Telementoring of a laparoscopic radical nephrectomy failed secondary to improper positioning of the robotic arm. Operative times compared between telementored and traditionally mentored procedures were not statistically different for basic procedures but were longer for advanced cases.

Conclusions: Telementoring of laparoscopic procedures is safe and feasible. Further clinical studies are needed prior to implementing telementoring in surgical training.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Docimo S, Moore RG, Kavoussi LR (1994) Laparoscopic orchiopexy for the palpable true undescended testicle: preliminary results. J Endourol (Abstr) 7 [Suppl 1]: S95

  2. Editorial (1995) Telemedicine: fad or future? Lancet 345: 73–74

  3. Green P, Satava R, Hill J, Simon I (1992) Telepresence: advanced teleoperator technology for minimally invasive surgery. Surg Endosc (Abstr) 6: 91

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hurteau R, Begin E, Gagner M (1994) Laparoscopic surgery assisted by a robotic cameraman: concept and experimental results. IEEE Internal Conference Proceedings 3: 2286–2289

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jordan GH, Winslow BH (1993) Laparoendoscopic upper pole partial nephrectomy with ureterectomy. J Urol 150: 940–943

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kavoussi LR, Clayman RV, Brunt ML, Soper NJ (1992) Laparoscopic ureterolysis. J Urol 147: 426–4295

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kavoussi LR, Kerbl K, Capelouto CC, McDougal EM, Clayman RV (1993) Laparoscopic nephrectomy for renal neoplasms. Urology 42: 603–609

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kavoussi LR, Peters CA (1993) Laparoscopic pyeloplasty. J Urol 150: 1891–1894

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kavoussi LR, Moore RG, Partin AW, Bender JS, Zenilman ME, Satava RM (1994) Telerobotic assisted laparoscopic surgery: initial laboratory and clinical experience. Urology 44: 15–19

    Google Scholar 

  10. McGee R, Tangalos EG (1994) Delivery of health care to the undeserved: potential contributions of telecommunications technology. Mayo Clin Proc 69: 1131–1136

    Google Scholar 

  11. McKernan JB, Wolfe BM, McFadyen BV Jr (1992) Laparoscopic repair of duodenal ulcers and gastroesophageal reflux. Surg Clin North Am 72: 1153–1167

    Google Scholar 

  12. Monson JR, Darzi A, Carey PD, Guillou PJ (1992) Prospective evaluation of laparoscopic assisted colectomy in an unselected group of patients. Lancet 340: 831–833

    Google Scholar 

  13. New York State Dept of Health (1992) Laparoscopic surgery. New York State Dept of Health Memorandum, Albany, Series 92-20, June 12

  14. Parra RO, Andrus C, Boullier J (1992) Staging laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection. Comparison of results with open pelvic lymphadenectomy. J Urol 147: 875–878

    Google Scholar 

  15. Polascik TJ, Moore RG, Rosenburg MT, Kavoussi LR (1995) Comparison of laparoscopic and open retropubic urethropexy for treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Urology 45: 647–651.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sackier J, Wang Y (1994) Robotic assisted surgery: from concept to development. Surg Endosc 8: 63–66

    Google Scholar 

  17. See WA, Cooper CS, Fisher RJ (1992) Predictors of laparoscopic complications after formal training in laparoscopic surgery. JAMA 270: 2689–2692

    Google Scholar 

  18. Society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons. (1991) Granting of privileges for laparoscopic general surgery. Am J Surg 161: 324–325

    Google Scholar 

  19. Soper NJ, Barteau JA, Clayman RV, Ashley SW, Dunnegan DL (1992) Comparison of early postoperative results for laparoscopic versus standard open cholecystectomy. Surg Gynecol Obstet 174: 114–118

    Google Scholar 

  20. Vogt DM, Curet MJ, Pitcher DE, Martin DT, Zucker KA (1995) Preliminary results of a prospective randomized trial of laparoscopic onlay versus conventional inguinal herniorrhaphy. Am J Surg 169: 84–90

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Moore, R.G., Adams, J.B., Partin, A.W. et al. Telementoring of laparoscopic procedures. Surg Endosc 10, 107–110 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00188353

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00188353

Key words

Navigation