Abstract
Information in the existing literature on some aspects of the collection and statistical analysis of Sedgwick-Rafter cell data appears contradictory, confusing, or absent. Using data from an experimental phytoplankton population as a basis, an investigation of S-R cell procedure has been undertaken with the following conclusions: I) settling time depends upon the type of preservation and the composition of the sample; 2) the field counting technique gives more accurate data and is less time consuming than the strip counting technique; 3) making fewer counts on each of a greater number of S-R cells gives more accurate results than making a greater number of counts on one or several S-R cells; 4) nonparametric methods offer a more convenient and nearly as efficient a means of detecting statistically significant differences as compared with parametric methods. A method is presented for optimally allocating counts within and among S-R cells for getting an estimator with the greatest precision in the least time.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
APHA (American Public Health Association). 1971. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. APHA, Washington. 13 ed.
Ballentine, D. 1953. Comparison of the different methods of estimating nannoplankton. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. U. K. 32: 129–148.
Brooks, S. H. 1955. The estimation of an optimum subsampling number. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 50: 398–415.
Cochran, W. G. 1953. Sampling Techniques. Wiley, New York.
Conover, W. J. 1971. Practical Nonparametric Statistics. Wiley, New York.
Gilbert, J. Y. 1942. The errors of the Sedgwick-Rafter counting chamber in the enumeration of phytoplankton. Trans. Am. Microsc. Soc. 61: 217–226.
Guillard, R. R. L. 1973. Division rates. pp. 289–311. In Janet R. Stein, (ed.) Handbook of Phycological Methods. Culture Methods and Growth Measurements. Cambridge Univ. Press, London.
Kutkuhn, J. H. 1958. Note on the precision of numerical and volumetric plankton estimates from small-sample concentrates. Limnol. Oceanogr. 3: 69–83.
Littleford, R. A., C. L. Newcombe & B. B. Shepherd. 1940. An experimental study of certain quantitative plankton methods. Ecology 21: 309–322.
Lund, J. W. G. & J. F. Talling. 1957. Botanical limnological methods with special reference to the algae. Bot. Rev. 23: 489–583.
McAlice, B. J. 1971. Phytoplankton sampling with the Sedgwick-Rafter cell. Limnol. Oceanogr. 16: 19–28.
Schwoerbel, J. 1970. Methods of Hydrobiology. Pergamon, New York.
Serfling, R. E. 1949. Quantitative estimates of plankton from small samples of Sedgwick-Rafter cell mounts of concentrate samples. Trans. Am. Microsc. Soc. 68: 185–199.
Sokal, R. R. and F. J. Rohlf. 1969. Biometry, The Principles and Practice of Biological Research. Freeman, San Francisco.
Welch, P. S. 1948. Limnological Methods. McGraw-Hill, New York.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Woelkerling, W.J., Kowal, R.R. & Gough, S.B. Sedgwick-rafter cell counts: a procedural analysis. Hydrobiologia 48, 95–107 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00040161
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00040161