Skip to main content
Log in

Sedgwick-rafter cell counts: a procedural analysis

  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Information in the existing literature on some aspects of the collection and statistical analysis of Sedgwick-Rafter cell data appears contradictory, confusing, or absent. Using data from an experimental phytoplankton population as a basis, an investigation of S-R cell procedure has been undertaken with the following conclusions: I) settling time depends upon the type of preservation and the composition of the sample; 2) the field counting technique gives more accurate data and is less time consuming than the strip counting technique; 3) making fewer counts on each of a greater number of S-R cells gives more accurate results than making a greater number of counts on one or several S-R cells; 4) nonparametric methods offer a more convenient and nearly as efficient a means of detecting statistically significant differences as compared with parametric methods. A method is presented for optimally allocating counts within and among S-R cells for getting an estimator with the greatest precision in the least time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • APHA (American Public Health Association). 1971. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. APHA, Washington. 13 ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ballentine, D. 1953. Comparison of the different methods of estimating nannoplankton. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. U. K. 32: 129–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, S. H. 1955. The estimation of an optimum subsampling number. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 50: 398–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochran, W. G. 1953. Sampling Techniques. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conover, W. J. 1971. Practical Nonparametric Statistics. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, J. Y. 1942. The errors of the Sedgwick-Rafter counting chamber in the enumeration of phytoplankton. Trans. Am. Microsc. Soc. 61: 217–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guillard, R. R. L. 1973. Division rates. pp. 289–311. In Janet R. Stein, (ed.) Handbook of Phycological Methods. Culture Methods and Growth Measurements. Cambridge Univ. Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kutkuhn, J. H. 1958. Note on the precision of numerical and volumetric plankton estimates from small-sample concentrates. Limnol. Oceanogr. 3: 69–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Littleford, R. A., C. L. Newcombe & B. B. Shepherd. 1940. An experimental study of certain quantitative plankton methods. Ecology 21: 309–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lund, J. W. G. & J. F. Talling. 1957. Botanical limnological methods with special reference to the algae. Bot. Rev. 23: 489–583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAlice, B. J. 1971. Phytoplankton sampling with the Sedgwick-Rafter cell. Limnol. Oceanogr. 16: 19–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwoerbel, J. 1970. Methods of Hydrobiology. Pergamon, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serfling, R. E. 1949. Quantitative estimates of plankton from small samples of Sedgwick-Rafter cell mounts of concentrate samples. Trans. Am. Microsc. Soc. 68: 185–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sokal, R. R. and F. J. Rohlf. 1969. Biometry, The Principles and Practice of Biological Research. Freeman, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welch, P. S. 1948. Limnological Methods. McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Woelkerling, W.J., Kowal, R.R. & Gough, S.B. Sedgwick-rafter cell counts: a procedural analysis. Hydrobiologia 48, 95–107 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00040161

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00040161

Keywords

Navigation