Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Evaluation of spring discharge dynamics using recession curve analysis: a case study in data-scarce region, Lesser Himalayas, India

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Sustainable Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There is a huge concern that the springs originating naturally from unconfined aquifers which are the main sources of domestic water on mountainous regions are either drying up or becoming seasonal. To understand the behavior of these springs, an analysis of spring discharge recession curve based on Darcian theory is being employed. A fracture- and contact-type spring located in the Aglar watershed has been instrumented for continuous discharge data collection. Objectives of this study are (1) to understand recession curves for different rainfall events, (2) to develop a master recession curve (MRC) and gain integrated information during the lean period and (3) to analyze the flow duration curve (FDC) for estimation of sustainable drinking water supply from spring. Ten major recession events from continuous daily rainfall and discharge data has been selected to understand the flow behavior during recession using exponential, least square, hyperbola and to develop a combined power law and exponential method. This paper also presents the MRC using three recession components (α 1, α 2, and α 3) as compared one recession coefficient. Domestic water requirement and availability is assessed by FDC analysis over the 2 years daily data. Analysis of ten events shows that, the combined power law and exponential relationship fits the recession curve, NSE (0.97–0.99) and RMSE (0.07–0.50) during the dry period in which depletion of flow occurs with low hydraulic conductivity and the exponential component represents its base flow, whereas the least square method fits the recession curve having NSE (0.90–0.99) and RMSE (0.07–0.22) during the wet period. The MRC supports the use of three exponential coefficients over a single exponential coefficient. The change in these ratio (α 1/α 2) from 5 to 8.76 and (α 2/α 3) from 9.21 to 2.9 explains the heterogeneity in the spring aquifer. The relationship between (−dQ/dt) and (Q) for recession events has different configuration which characterizes the dynamic behavior of spring. The flow duration curve indicates that there is water scarcity during dry seasons with around 30.6 liter per min could be taken as the characteristic value for the minimum spring flow.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ACWADAM (2009) Field-based capacity building in geohydrology based catchment area planning for spring water management under the Himmotthan initiative. ACWADAM technical report

  • Alaouze CM (1989) Reservoir releases to uses with different reliability requirements. J Am Water Resour Assoc 25(6):1163–1168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amit H, Lyakhovsky V, Katz A, Starinsky A, Burg A (2002) Interpretation of spring recession curves. Ground Water 40(5):543–551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson MG, Burt TP (1980) Interpretation of recession flow. J Hydrol 46(1–2):89–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angelini P, Walter D (1997) The problem of modeling limestone springs: the case of Bagnara (North Apennines, Italy). Ground Water 35(4):612–618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Auden JB (1934) The geology of the Krol belt. Rec Geol Surv India 67(4):357–454

    Google Scholar 

  • Baedke SJ, Krothe NC (2001) Derivation of effective hydraulic parameters of a karst aquifer from discharge hydrograph analysis. Water Resour Res 37(1):13–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakalowicz M (2005) Karst groundwater: a challenge for new resources. Hydrogeol J 13(1):148–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes BS (1939) The structure of discharge recession curve. Trans Am Geophys Union 20(4):721–725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beniston M (2003) Climatic change in mountain regions: a review of possible impacts. Clim Change 59(1):5–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beven JK (2000) Rainfall-runoff modelling: the primer. Wiley, Chichester, p 360

    Google Scholar 

  • BIS (2003) Indian standard drinking water-specification. (BIS 10500: 1991), Bureau of Indian Standards, 2.2 edn. IS 10500:1991, New Delhi

  • Biswal B and Marani M (2010) Geomorphological origin of recession curves. Geophys Res Lett 37:L24403. doi:10.1029/2010GL045415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blume T, Zehe E, Bronstert A (2007) Rainfall—runoff response, event-based runoff coefficients and hydrograph separation. Hydrol Sci J 52(5):843–862

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonacci O (1993) Karst spring hydrographs as indicators of karst aquifers. Hydrol Sci J 38(1):51–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boussinesq J (1904) Theoretical research on the flow sheets of water seeped into the soil and on the flow of springs. Pure Math Appl J 10:5–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Brutsaert W (2005) Hydrology: an introduction. Cambridge University Press, UK, p 605

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brutsaert W, Nieber JL (1977) Regionalized drought flow hydrographs from a mature glaciated plateau. Water Resour Res 13(3):637–643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chauhan M (2010) A perspective on watershed development in the Central Himalayan State of Uttarakhand, India. Int J Ecol Environ Sci 36(4):253–269

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaulagain N (2006) Impacts of climate change on water resources of nepal: the physical and socioeconomic. Conf Ser: Earth Environ Sci 6(29):292029

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng Q (2008) A combined power-law and exponential model for streamflow recessions. J Hydrol 352(1):157–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chow VT (1964) Handbook of applied hydrology. McGraw Hill Inc, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross WP, Bernhagen RJ (1949) Flow duration—Ohio streamflow characteristics, vol 10. no 1, Ohio Department of Natural Resource, Division of Water, Ohio

  • Cruz RV, Harasawa H, Lal M, Wu S, Anokhin Y, Punsalmaa B, Honda Y, Jafari M, Li C, Huu N (2007) Asia. In: Climate change 2007—impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. contribution of working group ii to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 469–506

  • Dataflow Systems Pty Ltd (2008) PC Software and technical handbook for odyssey data recorders. Dataflow Systems, Christchurch, New Zealand, pp 29–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Datta AR, Bolisetti T, Balachandar R (2012) Automated linear and nonlinear reservoir approaches for estimating annual baseflow. J Hydrol Eng 17:554–564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewandel B, Lachassagne P, Bakalowicz M, Weng Ph, Al-Malki A (2003) Evaluation of aquifer thickness by analysing recession hydrographs. Application to the Oman ophiolite hard-rock aquifer. J Hydrol 274:248–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dingman SL (1978) Synthesis of flow-duration curves for unregulated streams in New Hampshire. J Am Water Resour Assoc 14(6):1481–1502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dreiss SJ (1982) Linear kernel for karst aquifer. Water Resour Res 18:865–876

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fetter CW (1988) Applied hydrogeology. Ohio Merrill Publishing Company, Columbus

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiorillo F (2009) Spring hydrographs as indicators of droughts in a karst environment. J Hydrol 373:290–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiorillo F (2011) Tank-reservoir emptying as a simulation of recession limb of karst spring hydrographs. Hydrogeol J 19:1009–1019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiorillo F, Wilson RC (2004) Rainfall induced debris flows in pyroclastic deposits, Campania (southern Italy). Eng Geol 75(3):263–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiorillo F, Esposito L, Guadagno F (2007) Analyses and forecast of the water resource in an ultra-centenarian spring discharge series from Serino (southern Italy). J Hydrol 336(1):125–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford Derek, Williams P (1989) Karst Geomorphology and Hydrology. Unwin Hyman, London, p 601

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gilman K (1977a) Dilution gauging on the recession limb: 1. Constant rate injection method. Hydrol Sci J 22(3):353–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilman K (1977b) Dilution gauging on the recession limb: 2. The integration method. Hydrol Sci J 22(4):469–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hajkowicz S, Collins K (2007) A review of multiple criteria analysis for water resource planning and management. Water Resour Manag 21:1553–1566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen DP, Ye W, Jakeman AJ, Cooke R, Sharma P (1996) Analysis of the effect of rainfall and streamflow data quality and catchment dynamics on streamflow prediction using the rainfall-runoff model IHACRES. Environ Softw 11(1–3):193–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hergarten S, Birk S (2007) A fractal approach to the recession of spring hydrographs. Geophys Res Lett 34:L11401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hewlett JD, Hibbert AR (1967) Factors affecting the response of small watersheds to precipitation in humid areas. For Hydrol 1:275–290

    Google Scholar 

  • IIRS (1989) Geohydromorphology, soil, and vegetation landuse mapping of Aglar watershed (UP) using remote sensing techniques. Report

  • Jacob CE (1943) Correlation of ground-water levels and precipitation on Long Island, New York. Trans AGU 24(2):564–573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James LD, Thompson WO (1970) Least squares estimation of constants in a linear recession model. Water Resour Res 6(4):1062–1069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiraly L (2002) Karstification and groundwater flow. Evolution of karst: prekarst to cessation. Zalozba ZRC, Postojna-Ljubljana, pp 155–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Knisel WG (1963) Baseflow recession analysis for comparison of drainage basin and geology. J Geophys Res 68(12):3649–3653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korkmaz N (1990) The estimation of groundwater recharge from spring hydrographs. Hydrol Sci J 35(2):209–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kovacs A, Perrochet P, Kiraly L, Jeannin P (2005) A quantitative method for characterisation of karst aquifers based on the spring hydrograph analysis. J Hydrol 303:152–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krakauer NY, Temimi M (2011) Stream recession curves and storage variability in small watersheds. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 15(7):2377–2389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kresic N (1997) Quantitative solutions in hydrogeology and groundwater modeling. CRC Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, p 461

    Google Scholar 

  • Lastennet R, Mudry J (1997) Role of karstification and rainfall in the behavior of a heterogeneous karst system. Environ Geol 32(2):114–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laurenson BE (1961) A study of hydrograph recession curves of an experimental catchment. J Inst Eng Aust 33:253–258

    Google Scholar 

  • Long AJ, Derickson RG (1999) Linear system analysis in a karst aquifer. J Hydrol 219:206–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maillet ET (1905) Essais d’hydraulique souterraine and fluviale. A. Hermann, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Male JW, Ogawa H (1984) Tradeoffs in water quality management. J Water Resour Plan Manag 110(4):434–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mero F, (1963) Application of the groundwater depletion curves in analyzing and forecasting spring discharges influenced by well fields. In: Symposium on surface waters, general assembly of Berkeley of IUGG, vol 63. IAHS Publication, pp 107–117

  • Middleton N, Thomas D (1997) World Atlas of Desertification. 2nd edn. UNEP, Arnold Publication, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Milanovic PT (1981) Karst hydrogeology. Water Resources Publications, Littleton, p 434

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller PC, Poole DK, Miller PM (1983) The influence of annual precipitation, topography, and vegetative cover on soil moisture and summer drought in Southern California. Oecologia 56:385–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milly PCD (1993) An analytic solution of the stochastic storage problem applicable to soil-water. Water Resour Res 29(11):3755–3758

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell WD (1957) Flow duration curves of Illinois streams. Department of public works and buildings, Springfield, Illinois

    Google Scholar 

  • Moriasi DN, Arnold JG, Van Liew MW, Bingner RL, Harmel RD, Veith TL (2007) Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations. Trans ASABE 50(3):885–900

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nash JE, Sutcliffe JV (1970) River flow forecasting through conceptual models, part I—a discussion of principles. J Hydrol 10(3):282–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nathan RJ, McMahon TA (1990) Evaluation of automated techniques for base flow and recession analyses. Water Resour Res 26(7):1465–1473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Negi GCS, Joshi V (1996) Geo-hydrology of springs in a mountain watershed: the need for problem solving research. Curr Sci 71(10):772–776

    Google Scholar 

  • Negi GCS, Joshi V (2004) Rainfall and spring discharge patterns in two small drainage catchments in the Western Himalayan Mountains: India. Environmentalist 24(1):19–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pachauri AK, Pant M (1992) Landslide hazard mapping based on geological attributes. Eng Geol 32(1–2):81–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Padilla A, Pulido-Bosh A, Mangin A (1994) Relative importance of base flow and quick flow from hydrographs of karst spring. Ground Water 32(2):267–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peleg Nadav, Gvirtzman Haim (2010) Groundwater flow modeling of two-levels perched karstic leaking aquifers as a tool for estimating recharge and hydraulic parameters. J Hydrol 388(1):13–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petras I (1986) An approach to the mathematical expression of recession curves. Water SA 12(3):145–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinault JL, Plagnes V, Aquilina L, Bakalowicz M (2001) Inverse modeling of the hydrological and hydrochemical behavior of hydrosystems: characterization of karst system functioning. Water Resour Res 37(8):2191–2204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riggs HC (1964) The base-flow recession curve as an indicator of ground water. In: Proceedings of the general assembly at Berkeley of I.U.G.G., vol 63. IASH Publication, pp 352–363

  • Russo SL, Amanzio G, Ghione R, De Maio M (2015) Recession hydrographs and time series analysis of springs monitoring data: application on porous and shallow aquifers in mountain areas (Aosta Valley). Environ Earth Sci 73(11):7415–7434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sauter M (1992) Assessment of hydraulic conductivity in a karst aquifer at local and regional scale. Ground Water Manag 10:39–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen S, Srivastava P, Dane JH, Yoo KH, Shaw JN (2010) Spatial–temporal variability and hydrologic connectivity of runoff generation areas in a North Alabama pasture—implications for phosphorus transport. Hydrol Process 24(3):342–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shoemaker WB, Kuniansky EL, Birk S, Bauer S, Swain ED (2008) Documentation of a conduit flow process (CFP) for MODFLOW-2005. U.S. geological survey. In: Techniques and Methods, Book 6, Chap A24, p 50

  • Singh KP (1971) Model flow duration and streamflow variability. Water Resour Res 7(4):1031–1036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh KP, Stall JB (1971) Derivation of base flow recession curves and parameters. Water Resour Res 7(2):292–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smakhtin VU (2001) Low flow hydrology: a review. J Hydrol 240(3):147–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smart PL, Hobbs SL (1986) Characterization of carbonate aquifers: a conceptual base. In Proceedings of the environmental problems in karst terranes and their solutions conference, Bowling Green, KY, pp 1–14

  • Solyom PB, Tucker GE (2004) Effect of limited storm duration on landscape evolution, drainage basin geometry, and hydrograph shapes. J Geophys Res 109:F03012. doi:10.1029/2003JF000032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sophocleous M (2002) Interactions between groundwater and surface water: the state of the science. Hydrogeol J 10(1):52–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stitchler W, Hermann A (1982) Environmental isotopes as tracers in water balance studies of mountaineous watersheds. In: Proceedings of the Berne symposium on hydrological research basins, vol 2, pp 357–368

  • Sujono J, Shikasho S, Hiramatsu K (2004) A comparison of techniques for hydrograph recession analysis. Hydrol Process 18:403–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tague C, Grant G (2004) A geological framework for interpreting the low-flow regimes of Cascade streams, Willamette River Basin, Oregon. Water Resour Res 40(4):W04303. doi:10.1029/2003WR002629

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarafdar S (2013) Understanding the dynamics of high and low spring flow: a key to managing the water resources in a small urbanized hillslope of lesser Himalaya, India. Environ Earth Sci 70:2107–2114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toebes C, Strang DD (1994) On recession curves-1: recession equations. J Hydrol 3(2):2–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Toebes C, Morrissey WB, Shorter R, Hendy M (1969) Base-flow-recession curves. In: Proceedings of the handbook of hydrological procedures, vol 8. Ministry of Works, Wellington, New Zealand

  • Toth J (1962) A theory of groundwater motion in small drainage basins in central Alberta, Canada. J Geophys Res 67(11):4375–4388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO-WWAP (2006) Water: a shared responsibility. The United Nations World Water Development Report 2, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • UNFCCC (2007) Climate change: impacts, vulnerabilities and adaptations in developing countries. Climate Change Secretariat (UNFCCC), Bonn

    Google Scholar 

  • Upadhya M (2009) Ponds and landslides: water culture, food systems and the political economy of soil conservation in mid-hill Nepal. Nepal Water Conservation Foundation, Kathmandu

    Google Scholar 

  • Valdiya KS, Bartarya SK (1989) Diminishing discharges of mountain springs in a part of Kumaun Himalaya. Curr Sci 58(8):417–426

    Google Scholar 

  • Valdiya KS, Bartarya SK (1991) Hydrological studies of springs in the catchment of the Gaula River, Kumaun Lesser Himalaya, India. Mt Res Dev 11(3):239–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van WE, Van T, Vermeulen D (2012) Characteristics of local groundwater recharge cycles in South African semi-arid hard rock terrains: rainfall-groundwater interaction. Water SA 38(5):747–754

    Google Scholar 

  • Vashisht AK, Bam B (2013) Formulating the spring discharge-function for the recession period by analyzing its recession curve: a case study of the Ranichauri spring (India). J Earth Syst Sci 122(5):1313–1323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vashisht AK, Sharma HC (2007) Study on hydrological behavior of a natural spring. Curr Sci 93:837–840

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel RM, Kroll CN (1992) Regional geohydrologic-geomorphic relationships for the estimation of low-flow statistics. Water Resour Res 28(9):2451–2458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waltham AC (1971) Caving in Himalaya. Himal J 31. https://www.himalayanclub.org/hj/31/9/caving-in-the-himalaya. Accessed 20 May 2017

  • Weiss Menachem, Gvirtzman Haim (2007) Estimating ground water recharge using flow models of perched karstic aquifers. Ground Water 45(6):761–773

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White WB (1988) Geomorphology and Hydrology of karst terrains. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittenberg H (1999) Baseflow recession and recharge as nonlinear storage processes. Hydrol Process 13(5):715–726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yates P, Snyder WM (1975) Predicting recessions through convolution. Water Resour Res 11(3):418–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ye W, Hansen DP, Jakeman AJ, Sharma P, Cooke R (1997) Assessing the natural variability of runoff: clarence Basin catchments, NSW, Australia. Math Comput Simul 43(3–6):251–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Youngs EG (1985a) Characterization of hydrograph recession of land drains. J Hydrol 82:17–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Youngs EG (1985b) A simple equation for predicting water-table drawdowns. J Agric Eng Res 31(4):321–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu P, Yang T, Liu CA (2002) Regional model of low flow for Southern Taiwan. Hydrol Process 16(10):2017–2034

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkee for funding under FIG and the Science & Engineering Research Board (SERB), the Department of Science and Technology under Grant# SB/FTP/ETA-338/2013 towards the field visits and instrumentation. Thanks to the Central Himalayan Rural Action Group (CHIRAG) group for sharing the two spring data set. Authors would like to thank the editor and anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions, which helped authors to improve the manuscript. The authors also wish to thank Mr. Sumer Panwar for the field support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Hydrology, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, Roorkee, Uttarakhand, 247667, India

    Vikram Kumar & Sumit Sen

Authors
  1. Vikram Kumar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sumit Sen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sumit Sen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kumar, V., Sen, S. Evaluation of spring discharge dynamics using recession curve analysis: a case study in data-scarce region, Lesser Himalayas, India. Sustain. Water Resour. Manag. 4, 539–557 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40899-017-0138-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40899-017-0138-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation