Abstract
Recently, much attention has been focused on understanding casual sex, or hooking up, among college students. The current study uses an adaptationist approach to go beyond sex differences in casual sex behavior, examining predictors of emotional reactions and including a community sample (39 females, 84 males) in addition to a typical college sample (103 females, 62 males). If males and females possess different emotional mechanisms designed to evaluate the consequences of sexual behavior, we would expect sex differences in emotional reactions as well as in motivations for engaging in casual sex. Individual differences in motivation may influence whether emotional reactions to casual sex are positive or negative. Early environmental cues of relationship stability may also have an impact on emotional responses. Results indicate that in addition to sex differences, factors such as early environmental cues of relationship instability, individuals’ motivation for engaging in casual sex, and the number of their casual sex partners contribute to the positive or negative nature of their response to casual sex experiences. In addition, results from the community sample suggest that there may be life stage-specific effects.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barbaro, N., Boutwell, B. B., Barnes, J. C., & Shackelford, T. K. (2017). Genetic confounding of the relationship between father absence and age at menarch. Evolution and Human Behavior, 38, 357–365.
Bendixen, M., Asao, K., Wyckoff, J. P., Buss, D. M., & Kennair, L. E. O. (2017). Sexual regret in US and Norway: effects of culture and individual differences in religiosity and mating strategy. Personality and Individual Differences, 116, 246–251.
Bogaert, A. F. (2005). Age at puberty and father absence in a national probability sample. Journal of Adolescence, 28, 541–546.
Boothroyd, L. G., Craig, P. S., Crossman, R. J., & Perrett, D. I. (2013). Father absence and age at first birth in a western sample. American Journal of Human Biology, 25, 366–369.
Buss, D. M. (1989). Conflict between the sexes: strategic interference and the evocation of anger and upset. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 735–747.
Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: an evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204–232.
Campbell, A. (2008). The morning after the night before. Human Nature, 19, 157–173.
Dubé, S., Lavoie, F., Blais, M., & Hébert, M. (2017). Consequences of casual sex relationships and experiences on adolescents’ psychological well-being: a prospective study. The Journal of Sex Research, 54, 1006–1017.
Ellis, B. J., Schlomer, G. L., Tilley, E. H., & Butler, E. A. (2012). Impact of fathers on risky sexual behavior in daughters: a genetically and environmentally controlled sibling study. Development and Psychopathology, 24, 317–332.
Fielder, R. L., & Carey, M. P. (2010). Predictors and consequences of sexual “hookups” among college students: a short-term prospective study. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 1105–1119.
Flack, W. F., Daubman, K. A., Caron, M. L., Asadorian, J. A., D’Aureli, N. R., Gigliotti, S. N., Hall, A. T., Kiser, S., & Stine, E. R. (2007). Risk factors and consequences of unwanted sex among university students: hooking up, alcohol, and stress response. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 22, 139–157.
Garcia, J. R., & Reiber, C. (2008). Hook-up behavior: a biopsychosocial perspective. Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology, 2, 192–208.
Garcia, J. R., Reiber, C., Massey, S. G., & Merriwether, A. M. (2012). Sexual hookup culture: a review. Review of General Psychology, 16, 161–176.
Gaydosh, L., Belsky, D. W., Domingue, B. W., Boardman, J. D., & Harris, K. M. (2018). Father absence and accelerated reproductive development in non-Hispanic white women in the United Statest. Demography, 55(4), 1245–1267.
Hamilton, L., & Armstrong, E. A. (2009). Gendered sexuality in young adulthood: double binds and flawed options. Gender & Society, 23(5), 589–616.
Haselton, M. G., & Buss, D. M. (2001). The affective shift hypothesis: the functions of emotional changes following sexual intercourse. Personal Relationships, 8, 357–369.
Haselton, M. G., Buss, D. M., Oubaid, V., & Angleitner, A. (2005). Sex, lies, and strategic interference: the psychology of deception between the sexes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 3–23.
Hehman, J. A., & Salmon, C. A. (2019). Sex-specific developmental effects of father absence on casual sexual behavior and life history strategy. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 5(1), 121–130.
Hrgovic, J., & Hromatko, I. (2018). Self-deception as a function of social status. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences, 13(3), 223–234.
Hughes, S. M., & Kruger, D. J. (2011). Sex differences in post-coital behaviors in long- and short-term mating: an evolutionary perspective. Journal of Sex Research, 48(5), 496–505.
James, J., Ellis, B. J., Schlomer, G. L., & Garber, J. (2012). Sex-specific pathways to early puberty, sexual debut, and sexual risk taking: tests of an integrated evolutionary–developmental model. Developmental Psychology, 48, 687–702.
Jonason, P. K., Li, N. P., & Cason, M. J. (2009). The “booty call”: a compromise between men’s and women’s ideal mating strategies. Journal of Sex Research, 4, 460–470.
Kanazawa, S. (2001). Why father absence might precipitate early menarche: the role of polygyny. Evolution and Human Behavior, 22, 329–334.
Kennair, L. E. O., Wyckoff, J. P., Asao, K., Buss, D. M., & Bendixen, M. (2018). Why do women regret casual sex more than men do? Personality and Individual Differences, 127, 61–67.
Kuperberg, A., & Padgett, J. E. (2016). The role of culture in explaining college students’ selection into hookups, dates, and long-term romantic relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 33, 1070–1096.
Levin, R. J. (2007). Sexual activity, health, and well-being: the beneficial roles of coitus and masturbation. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 22, 135–148.
Lewis, M. A., Granato, H., Blayney, J. A., Lostutter, T. W., & Kilmer, J. R. (2012). Predictors of hooking up sexual behaviors and emotional reactions among US college students. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41, 1219–1229.
Maestripieri, D., Roney, J. R., DeBias, N., Durante, K. M., & Spaepen, G. M. (2004). Father absence, menarche and interest in infants among adolescent girls. Developmental Science, 7, 560–566.
Owen, J., & Fincham, F. D. (2011). Young adults’ emotional reactions after hooking up encounters. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 321–330.
Paul, E. L., & Hayes, K. A. (2002). The casualties of ‘casual’ sex: a qualitative exploration of the phenomenology of college students’ hookups. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 19, 639–661.
Penke, L., & Asendorpf, J. B. (2008). Beyond global sociosexual orientations: a more differentiated look at sociosexuality and its effects on courtship and romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1113–1135.
Roese, N. J., Pennington, G. L., Coleman, J., Janicki, M., Li, N. P., & Kenrick, D. T. (2006). Sex differences in regret: all for love or some for lust? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 770–780.
Salmon, C., & Symons, D. (2001). Warrior lovers: erotic fiction, evolution and female sexuality. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Salmon, C., Townsend, J. M., & Hehman, J. (2016). Casual sex and college students: sex differences and the impact of father absence. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 2, 254–261.
Schmitt, D. P., & Jonason, P. K. (2019). Self-esteem as an adaptive sociometer of mating success: evaluating evidence of sex-specific psychological design across 10 world regions. Personality and Individual Differences, 143, 13–20.
Sevi, B., Aral, T., & Eskenazi, T. (2018). Exploring the hook-up app: low sexual disgust and high sociosexuality predict motivation to use Tinder for casual sex. Personality and Individual Differences, 133, 17–20.
Sheppard, P., & Sear, R. (2011). Father absence predicts age at sexual maturity and reproductive timing in British men. Biology Letters. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2011.0747.
Symons, D. (1979). The evolution of human sexuality. New York: Oxford University Press.
Timmermans, E., & Courtois, C. (2018). From swiping to casual sex and/or committed relationships: exploring the experiences of Tinder users. The Information Society, 34, 59–70.
Townsend, J. M., & Wasserman, T. H. (2011). Sexual hookups among college students: sex differences in emotional reactions. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 1173–1181.
Townsend, J. M., Wasserman, T. H., & Rosenthal, A. (2015). Gender difference in emotional reactions and sexual coercion in casual sexual relations: an evolutionary perspective. Personality and Individual Differences, 85, 41–49.
Townsend, J. M., Jonason, P. K., & Wasserman, T. H. (2019). Associations between motives for casual sex, depression, self-esteem, and sexual victimization. Archives of Sexual Behavior. Advance online publication, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-019-01482-3.
Trivers, R. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In B. Campbell (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man: 1871-1971 (pp. 136–179). Chicago: Aldine.
Trivers, R. (2011). The folly of fools: the logic of deceit and self-deception in human life. Arizona: Basic Books.
Vrangalova, Z. (2015). Does casual sex harm college students’ well-being? A longitudinal investigation of the role of motivation. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44, 945–959.
Woerner, J., & Abbey, A. (2017). Positive feelings after casual sex: the role of gender and traditional gender-role beliefs. The Journal of Sex Research, 54, 717–727.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hehman, J.A., Salmon, C.A. Beyond Sex Differences: Predictors of Negative Emotions Following Casual Sex. Evolutionary Psychological Science 6, 97–108 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-019-00217-w
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-019-00217-w