Abstract
The focus of this paper is an analysis and discussion of what kind of empirical evidence bodies that advise on or set public policy in the area of reproduction and reproductive technologies are looking for when developing new advice or policy, but the analysis has implications for other areas of ‘bioethics policy making’ as well. The paper outlines some important differences between policy making and philosophical analysis, provides an account of ‘policy relevance’ and discusses ways in which evidence may be misused in policy making. The scope of the paper is, for the most part restricted to considerations of empirical evidence of a social scientific nature.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
All policies are, or ought to be constrained by human rights considerations, but this still leaves a wide margin of discretion for the policy maker.
References
Beauchamp, T.L., and J.F. Childress. 2001. Principles of biomedical ethics, 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Blake, L., M. Richards, and S. Golombok. 2014. The families of assisted reproduction and adoption. In Family-making: Contemporary ethics challenges, ed. F. Baylis, and C. McLeod, 64–88. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Boswell, C. 2008. The political functions of expert knowledge: knowledge and legitimation in European Union immigration policy. Journal of European Public Policy 15: 471–488.
Boswell, C. 2009. The political uses of expert knowledge: immigration policy and social research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brock, D.W. 1987. Truth or consequences: The role of philosophers in policy-making. Ethics 97: 786–791.
Daniels, N. 1979. Wide reflective equilibrium and theory acceptance in ethics. The Journal of Philosophy 76: 256–282.
Gerston, L.N. 2010. Public policy making—process and principles, 3rd ed. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
Harvey, A., and B. Salter. 2012. Anticipatory governance: bioethical expertise for human/animal chimeras. Science As Culture 21: 291–313.
Holm, S. 1993. The spare embryo—A red herring in the embryo experimentation debate. Health Care Analysis 1: 63–66.
Holm, S., and M.F. Jonas (eds.). 2004. Engaging the world: The use of empirical research in bioethics and the regulation of biotechnology. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
Holm, S. 2006. Wrongful life, the welfare principle and the non-identity problem: Some further complications. In First Do No Harm, ed. S.A.M. McLean, 407–419. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Holm, S. 2007. Hvorfor er de så forskellige? Det Danske Etiske Råd i international belysning (Why are they so different? The Danish Council of Ethics in an international light). In Etik i Tiden—20 år med Det Etiske Råd, ed. K. Kappel, and A. Lykkeskov, 185–194. København: Det Etiske Råd.
Holm, S., and T. Takala. 2007. High hopes and automatic escalators: a critique of some new arguments in bioethics. Journal of Medical Ethics 33: 1–4.
Jann, W., and K. Wegrich. 2007. 4 theories of the policy cycle. In Handbook of public policy analysis, ed. F. Fischer, G.J. Miller, and M.S. Sidney, 43–62. New York: CRC Press.
Jonsen, A.R., and L.H. Butler. 1975. Public ethics and policy making. Hastings Centre Report 5: 19–31.
Robertson, J.A. 2000. Human cloning: Public policy when cloning is safe and effective. In Human cloning: Science, ethics and public policy, ed. B. Mackinnon, 132–152. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
Salter, B., and A. Harvey. 2014. Creating problems in the governance of science: Bioethics and human/animal chimeras. Science and Public Policy. doi:10.1093/scipol/sct063.
Solbakk, J.H. 2014. The whole and the art of medical dialectic: A platonic account. Medicine Health Care and Philosophy 17: 39–52.
Strathern, M. 1992. Reproducing the future. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Thompson, C. 2005. Making parents: The ontological choreography of reproductive technologies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Wolff, J. 2011. Ethics and public policy—A philosophical inquire. Abingdon: Routledge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Holm, S., Ploug, T. The use of empirical evidence in formulating reproductive policy advice and policy. Monash Bioeth. Rev. 33, 7–17 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40592-015-0020-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40592-015-0020-4