Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Efficient Project Delivery Using Lean Principles - An Indian Case Study

  • Original Contribution
  • Published:
Journal of The Institution of Engineers (India): Series A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Construction industry in India is growing at a rapid pace. Along with this growth, the industry is facing numerous challenges that are making delivery of projects inefficient. Experts believe that capacity constraints in the industry need to be addressed immediately. Government has recommended ‘introduction of efficient technologies and modern management techniques’ to increase the productivity of the industry. In this context, lean principles can act as a lever to make project delivery more efficient and provide the much needed impetus to the Indian construction sector. Around the globe lean principles are showing positive results on the projects. Project teams are reporting improvements in construction time, cost and quality along with softer benefits of enhanced collaboration, coordination and trust in project teams. Can adoption of lean principles provide similar benefits in the Indian construction sector? This research was conducted to answer this question. Using an action research approach a key lean construction tool called Last Planner System (LPS) was tested on a large Indian construction project. The work described in this work investigates the improvements achieved in project delivery by adopting LPS in Indian construction sector. Comparison in pre- and post-implementation data demonstrates increase in the certainty of work-flow and improves schedule compliance. This is measured through a simple LPS metric called percent plan complete. Explicit improvements in schedule performance are seen during 8 week LPS implementation along with implicit improvements in coordination, collaboration and trust in the project team. This work reports the findings of LPS implementation on the case study project outlining the barriers and drivers to adoption, strategies needed to ensure successful implementation and roadmap for implementation. Based on the findings the authors envision that lean construction can make project delivery more efficient in India.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Accenture and CIDC, High Performance in Infrastructure and Construction: India Perspective 2012. (2012) [Online]. http://www.accenture.com/in-en/Pages/insight-infrastructure-construction-industry-india.aspx. Accessed 13 Nov 2014

  2. A. Sawhney, R. Agnihotri, Grand Challenges for the Indian construction industry. Built Environ. Proj. Asset Manag. 4(4), 317–334 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Planning Commission of India, Investment in Infrastructure during the Eleventh Five Year Plan (2011)

  4. R. Singh, Delays and cost overruns in infrastructure projects : extent, causes and remedies. Econ. Polit. Wkly. 45, 43–54 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  5. K.N. Satyanarayana, K.C. Iyer, Evaluation of delays in indian construction contracts. J. Inst. Eng. 77, 14–22 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  6. K.C. Iyer, K.N. Jha, Critical factors affecting schedule performance: evidence from indian construction projects. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 132, 871–881 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. S. Tabish, K.N. Jha, Analyses and evaluation of irregularities in public procurement in India. Constr. Manag. Econ. 29, 261–274 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. K. Ahsan, I. Gunawan, Analysis of cost and schedule performance of international development projects. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 28(1), 68–78 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. J. Pettersen, Defining lean production: some conceptual and practical issues. TQM J. 21, 127–142 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. J.P. Womack, D.T. Jones, D. Roos, The Machine That Changed the World: The Story of Lean Production, Reprint. HarperCollins (1991), p. 323

  11. G.A. Howell, What is lean construction? in Proceedings of 7th IGLC (1999)

  12. A. Sawhney, Modelling value in construction processes using value stream mapping. Masterbuilder (2014)

  13. H.G. Ballard, The Last Planner System of Production Control (The University of Birmingham, Birmingham, 2000)

    Google Scholar 

  14. T. Ōno, Toyota Production System: Beyond Large-Scale Production (Productivity Press, London, 1988)

    Google Scholar 

  15. G. Howell, What is lean construction. Concurrent Engineering 7(July), 1–10 (1999)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. L. Koskela, Application of the New Philosophy to Construction (Center for Integrated Facility Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, 1992)

    Google Scholar 

  17. O. Salem, J. Solomon, A. Genaidy, I. Minkarah, Lean construction: from theory to implementation. J. Manag. Eng. 22(4), 168–175 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. A. Mossman, Why isn’t the UK construction industry going lean with gusto? Lean Constr. J. 5, 24–36 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  19. E. Johansen, L. Walter, Lean construction: prospects for the German construction industry. Lean Constr. J. 3, 19–32 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  20. A. Koskenvesa, L. Koskela, T. Tolonen, S. Sahlsted, Waste and labor productivity in production planning case Finnish construction industry, in 18th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction (2010)

  21. L. Koskela, J. Leikasb, Implementation of lean production in construction component manufacturing, in Automation and Robotics in Construction XII (1995), pp. 211–220

  22. G. Barbosa, C. Biotto, B. Mota, Implementing lean construction effectively in a year in a construction project, in 21st Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction (2013), pp. 1017–1026

  23. L.F. Alarcón, S. Diethelm, O. Rojo, Collaborative implementation of lean planning systems in Chilean construction companies, in Tenth Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction (IGLC-10), August, Brazil (2002), pp. 1–11

  24. M. Fiallo, G. Howell, Using production system design and takt time to improve project performance, in Proceedings for the 20th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction (2012)

  25. R. Al-Aomar, Analysis of lean construction practices at Abu Dhabi construction industry. Lean Constr. J. 2012, 105–121 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  26. W. Peng, L.S. Pheng, Lean and green: emerging issues in the construction industry—a case study, in 20–21 Sep 2011, EPPM, Singapore (2011), pp. 20–21

  27. G. Shang, The Toyota Way Model: An Implementation Framework for Large Chinese Construction Firms (National University of Singapore, Singapore, 2013)

    Google Scholar 

  28. M. Horman, R. Kenley, V. Jennings, A lean approach to construction: an historical case study, in 5th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, ed. by S.N. Tucker (1997), pp. 63–76

  29. I. McKinsey & Company, Building India—Accelerating Infrastructure Projects (2009)

  30. O. Salem, J. Solomon, A. Genaidy, M. Luegring, Site implementation and assessment of lean construction techniques. Lean Constr. J. 2(2), 1–21 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Engineers Australia WA Division, Recommended practices for the application of LEAN construction methods to building new Australian LNG Capacity. Engineers Australia, 2012. [Online]. https://www.engineersaustralia.org.au/sites/default/files/shado/Divisions/WesternAustraliaDivision/TechnicalPresentations/lean_construction_august_2012.pdf. Accessed 2 Sept 2014

  32. J. Darrington, Using a design-build contract for Lean Integrated Project Delivery. Lean Constr. J. 85–91 (2011)

  33. G. Ballard, I. Tommelein, Lean management methods for complex projects. Eng. Proj. Organ. J. 2, 85–96 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. S. Bertelsen, J. Nielsen, Just-in-time logistics in the supply of building material, in 1st International Conference on Construction Industry Development: Building the future Together (1997), pp. 9–11

  35. M. Rother, J. Shook, J. Womack, D. Jones, Learning to See: Value Stream Mapping to Add Value and Eliminate MUDA (Lean Enterprise Institute, Cambridge, 1999)

    Google Scholar 

  36. G. Ballard, Lean construction and EPC performance improvement, in Proceedings of the 1st Annual Meeting of the International Group for Lean Construction (1993), pp. 79–92

  37. J.L. Fernandez Solis, Z.K. Rybkowski, S. Lavy, V. Porwal, N. Lagoo, K. Son, A. Shafaat, Survey of motivations, benefits and implementation challenges of Last Planner® System users. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 139(4), 354–360 (2013). doi:10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000606

  38. A. Mossman, Last Planner—5 + 1 crucial & collaborative conversations for predictable design & construction delivery 2013. [Online]. http://www.leanconstruction.org/media/docs/Mossman-Last-Planner. Accessed 10 Oct 2014

  39. G. Ballard, G. Howell, An update on last planner, in 11th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction (2003), pp. 1–10

  40. S. Gao, S.P. Low, The Last Planner System in China’s construction industry—a SWOT analysis on implementation. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 32, 1260–1272 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. J. Garza, M. Leong, Last Planner technique: a case study, in Construction Congress VI (2000), pp. 680–689

  42. E. Johansen, G. Porter, An experience of introducing last planner into a UK construction project, in The 11th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction (2003)

  43. M. Fiallo, V.H. Revelo, Applying the last planner control system to a construction project—a case study in Quito, Ecuador, in 10th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, ed by C.T. Formoso, G. Ballard. (2002), pp. 1–12

  44. A. Alsehaimi, Last planner system: experiences from pilot implementation in the Middle East, in 17th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction (2009)

  45. Y.W. Kim, J.W. Jang, Case study: an application of last planner to heavy civil construction in Korea, in Proceedings of the 13th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction (2005), pp. 405–411

  46. M. Liu, G. Ballard, W. Ibbs, Work flow variation and labor productivity: case study. J. Manag. Eng. 27, 236–242 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. G. Ballard, Lookahead planning: the missing link in production control, in Proceedings of 5 th Annual Conference International Group of Lean Construction (1997), pp. 1–14

  48. G. Ballard, G. Howell, Implementing lean construction: improving downstream performance, in Presented at the 2nd Annual Conference on Lean Construction at Catolica Universidad de Chile (1994)

  49. G. Howell, G. Ballard, Lean production theory: moving beyond ‘Can-Do, in 2nd Annual Conference on Lean Construction (1994), pp. 17–24

  50. P. Järvinen, Action research is similar to design science. Qual. Quant. 41(1), 37–54 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. B. Dick, Action research: action and research, 2002. [Online]. http://www.scu.edu.au/schools/gcm/ar/arp/aandr.html. http://www.aral.com.au/. Accessed 10 Nov 2014

  52. E. Gummesson, Qualitative methods in management research, in Long Range Planning, vol. 25 (Sage, London, 1992), p. 131

  53. F. Hamzeh, G. Ballard, I.D. Tommelein, Rethinking lookahead planning to optimize construction workflow. Lean Constr. J. 15–34 (2012)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. L&T Construction, Valsad, Gujarat, India

    P. Ramachandra Reddy Kovvuri

  2. RICS School of Built Environment, Amity University, Noida, India

    Anil Sawhney, Ritu Ahuja & Aiswarya Sreekumar

Authors
  1. P. Ramachandra Reddy Kovvuri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Anil Sawhney
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ritu Ahuja
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Aiswarya Sreekumar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anil Sawhney.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kovvuri, P., Sawhney, A., Ahuja, R. et al. Efficient Project Delivery Using Lean Principles - An Indian Case Study. J. Inst. Eng. India Ser. A 97, 19–26 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40030-016-0142-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40030-016-0142-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation