Skip to main content
Log in

Keratinocyte Migration in a Three-Dimensional In Vitro Wound Healing Model Co-Cultured with Fibroblasts

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine Aims and scope

Abstract

Background:

Because three-dimensional (3D) models more closely mimic native tissues, one of the goals of 3D in vitro tissue models is to aid in the development and toxicity screening of new drug therapies. In this study, a 3D skin wound healing model comprising of a collagen type I construct with fibrin-filled defects was developed.

Methods:

Optical imaging was used to measure keratinocyte migration in the presence of fibroblasts over 7 days onto the fibrin-filled defects. Additionally, cell viability and growth of fibroblasts and keratinocytes was measured using the alamarBlue® assay and changes in the mechanical stiffness of the 3D construct was monitored using compressive indentation testing.

Results:

Keratinocyte migration rate was significantly increased in the presence of fibroblasts with the cells reaching the center of the defect as early as day 3 in the co-culture constructs compared to day 7 for the control keratinocyte monoculture constructs. Additionally, constructs with the greatest rate of keratinocyte migration had reduced cell growth. When fibroblasts were cultured alone in the wound healing construct, there was a 1.3 to 3.4-fold increase in cell growth and a 1.2 to 1.4-fold increase in cell growth for keratinocyte monocultures. However, co-culture constructs exhibited no significant growth over 7 days. Finally, mechanical testing showed that fibroblasts and keratinocytes had varying effects on matrix stiffness with fibroblasts degrading the constructs while keratinocytes increased the construct’s stiffness.

Conclusion:

This 3D in vitro wound healing model is a step towards developing a mimetic construct that recapitulates the complex microenvironment of healing wounds and could aid in the early studies of novel therapeutics that promote migration and proliferation of epithelial cells.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Eming SA, Martin P, Tomic-Canic M. Wound repair and regeneration: mechanisms, signaling, and translation. Sci Transl Med. 2014;6:265sr6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sen CK, Gordillo GM, Roy S, Kirsner R, Lambert L, Hunt TK, et al. Human skin wounds: a major and snowballing threat to public health and the economy. Wound Repair Regen. 2009;17:763–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Snyder RJ, Kirsner RS, Warriner RA 3rd, Lavery LA, Hanft JR, Sheehan P. Consensus recommendations on advancing the standard of care for treating neuropathic foot ulcers in patients with diabetes. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2010;56:S1–24.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Romanelli M, Dini V, Bertone MS. Randomized comparison of OASIS Wound Matrix versus moist wound dressing in the treatment of difficult-to-heal wounds of mixed arterial/venous etiology. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2010;23:34–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mostow EN, Haraway GD, Dalsing M, Hodde JP, King D; OASIS Venus Ulcer Study Group. Effectiveness of an extracellular matrix graft (OASIS Wound Matrix) in the treatment of chronic leg ulcers: a randomized clinical trial. J Vasc Surg. 2005;41:837–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gottrup F, Cullen BM, Karlsmark T, Bischoff-Mikkelsen M, Nisbet L, Gibson MC. Randomized controlled trial on collagen/oxidized regenerated cellulose/silver treatment. Wound Repair Regen. 2013;21:216–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hu MS, Maan ZN, Wu JC, Rennert RC, Hong WX, Lai TS, et al. Tissue engineering and regenerative repair in wound healing. Ann Biomed Eng. 2014;42:1494–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Badylak SE, Gilbert TW. Immune response to biologic scaffold materials. Semin Immunol. 2008;20:109–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Okabe K, Hayashi R, Aramaki-Hattori N, Sakamoto Y, Kishi K. Wound treatment using growth factors. Mod Plast Surg. 2013;3:108–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Papanas N, Maltezos E. Becaplermin gel in the treatment of diabetic neuropathic foot ulcers. Clin Interv Aging. 2008;3:233–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Long DW, Johnson NR, Jeffries EM, Hara H, Wang Y. Controlled delivery of platelet-derived proteins enhances porcine wound healing. J Control Release. 2017;253:73–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hingorani A, LaMuraglia GM, Henke P, Meissner MH, Loretz L, Zinszer KM, et al. The management of diabetic foot: a clinical practice guideline by the Society for Vascular Surgery in collaboration with the American Podiatric Medical Association and the Society for Vascular Medicine. J Vasc Surg. 2016;63:3S–21S.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Robson MC, Steed DL, Franz MG. Wound healing: biologic features and approaches to maximize healing trajectories—in brief. Curr Probl Surg. 2001;38:72–140.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Berlanga-Acosta J, Fernández-Montequín J, Valdés-Pérez C, Savigne-Gutiérrez W, Mendoza-Marí Y, García-Ojalvo A, et al. Diabetic foot ulcers and epidermal growth factor: revisiting the local delivery route for a successful outcome. Biomed Res Int 2017;2017:2923759.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. DesRochers TM, Suter L, Roth A, Kaplan DL. Bioengineered 3D human kidney tissue, a platform for the determination of nephrotoxicity. PLoS One. 2013;8:e59219.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Chang R, Emami K, Wu H, Sun W. Biofabrication of a three-dimensional liver micro-organ as an in vitro drug metabolism model. Biofabrication. 2010;2:045004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sung JH, Shuler ML. A micro cell culture analog (mu CCA) with 3-D hydrogel culture of multiple cell lines to assess metabolism-dependent cytotoxicity of anti-cancer drugs. Lab Chip. 2009;9:1385–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Lan SF, Starly B. Alginate based 3D hydrogels as an in vitro co-culture model platform for the toxicity screening of new chemical entities. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2011;256:62–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kirsch-Volders M, Decordier I, Elhajouji A, Plas G, Aardema MJ, Fenech M. In vitro genotoxicity testing using the micronucleus assay in cell lines, human lymphocytes and 3D human skin models. Mutagenesis. 2011;26:177–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Nakamura K, Mizutani R, Sanbe A, Enosawa S, Kasahara M, Nakagawa A, et al. Evaluation of drug toxicity with hepatocytes cultured in a micro-space cell culture system. J Biosci Bioeng. 2011;111:78–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Cantòn I, Cole DM, Kemp EH, Watson PF, Chunthapong J, Ryan AJ, et al. Development of a 3D human in vitro skin co-culture model for detecting irritants in real-time. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2010;106:794–803.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hu T, Khambatta ZS, Hayden PJ, Bolmarcich J, Binder RL, Robinson MK, et al. Xenobiotic metabolism gene expression in the EpiDerm™ in vitro 3D human epidermis model compared to human skin. Toxicol Vitro. 2010;24:1450–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Tao H, Berno AJ, Cox DR, Frazer KA. In vitro human keratinocyte migration rates are associated with SNPs in the KRT1 interval. PLoS One. 2007;2:e697.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Bindschadler M, McGrath JL. Sheet migration by wounded monolayers as an emergent property of single-cell dynamics. J Cell Sci. 2007;120:876–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Wang ZX, Wang Y, Farhangfar F, Zimmer M, Zhang Y. Enhanced keratinocyte proliferation and migration in co-culture with fibroblasts. PLoS One. 2012;7:e40951.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Chen ZJ, Yang JP, Wu BM, Tawil B. A novel three-dimensional wound healing model. J Dev Biol. 2014;2:198–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Gottrup F, Agren MS, Karlsmark T. Models for use in wound healing research: a survey focusing on in vitro and in vivo adult soft tissue. Wound Repair Regen. 2000;8:83–96.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Groeber F, Holeiter M, Hampel M, Hinderer S, Schenke-Layland K. Skin tissue engineering—in vivo and in vitro applications. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2011;63:352–66.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Liang CC, Park AY, Guan JL. In vitro scratch assay: a convenient and inexpensive method for analysis of cell migration in vitro. Nat Protoc. 2007;2:329–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. O’Leary R, Arrowsmith M, Wood EJ. Characterization of the living skin equivalent as a model of cutaneous re-epithelialization. Cell Biochem Funct. 2002;20:129–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Xie Y, Rizzi SC, Dawson R, Lynam E, Richards S, Leavesley DI, et al. Development of a three-dimensional human skin equivalent wound model for investigating novel wound healing therapies. Tissue Eng Part C Methods. 2010;16:1111–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Duong H, Wu B, Tawil B. Modulation of 3D fibrin matrix stiffness by intrinsic fibrinogen-thrombin compositions and by extrinsic cellular activity. Tissue Eng Part A. 2009;15:1865–76.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Sese N, Cole M, Tawil B. Proliferation of human keratinocytes and cocultured human keratinocytes and fibroblasts in three-dimensional fibrin constructs. Tissue Eng Part A. 2011;17:429–37.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Ho W, Tawil B, Dunn JC, Wu BM. The behavior of human mesenchymal stem cells in 3D fibrin clots: dependence on fibrinogen concentration and clot structure. Tissue Eng. 2006;12:1587–95.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Chiu CL, Hecht V, Duong H, Wu B, Tawil B. Permeability of three-dimensional fibrin constructs corresponds to fibrinogen and thrombin concentrations. Biores Open Access. 2012;1:34–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Cole M, Cox S, Inman E, Chan C, Mana M, Helgerson S, et al. Fibrin as a delivery vehicle for active macrophage activator lipoprotein-2 peptide: in vitro studies. Wound Repair Regen. 2007;15:521–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Cox S, Cole M, Tawil B. Behavior of human dermal fibroblasts in three-dimensional fibrin clots: dependence on fibrinogen and thrombin concentration. Tissue Eng. 2004;10:942–54.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Reinertsen E, Skinner M, Wu B, Tawil B. Concentration of fibrin and presence of plasminogen affect proliferation, fibrinolytic activity, and morphology of human fibroblasts and keratinocytes in 3D fibrin constructs. Tissue Eng Part A. 2014;20:2860–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Buchta C, Hedrich HC, Macher M, Höcker P, Redl H. Biochemical characterization of autologous fibrin sealants produced by CryoSeal and Vivostat in comparison to the homologous fibrin sealant product Tissucol/Tisseel. Biomaterials. 2005;26:6233–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Rowe SL, Lee S, Stegemann JP. Influence of thrombin concentration on the mechanical and morphological properties of cell-seeded fibrin hydrogels. Acta Biomater. 2007;3:59–67.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Blombäck B, Carlsson K, Hessel B, Liljeborg A, Procyk R, Aslund N. Native fibrin gel networks observed by 3D microscopy, permeation and turbidity. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1989;997:96–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Kubota K, Kogure H, Masuda Y, Toyama Y, Kita R, Takahashi A, et al. Gelation dynamics and gel structure of fibrinogen. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2004;38:103–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Dikovsky D, Bianco-Peled H, Seliktar D. The effect of structural alterations of PEG-fibrinogen hydrogel scaffolds on 3-D cellular morphology and cellular migration. Biomaterials. 2006;27:1496–506.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Pizzo AM, Kokini K, Vaughn LC, Waisner BZ, Voytik-Harbin SL. Extracellular matrix (ECM) microstructural composition regulates local cell-ECM biomechanics and fundamental fibroblast behavior: a multidimensional perspective. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2005;98:1909–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Karp JM, Sarraf F, Shoichet MS, Davies JE. Fibrin-filled scaffolds for bone-tissue engineering: an in vivo study. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2004;71:162–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Mooney RG, Costales CA, Curtin JM, Tawil B, Shaw MC. Indentation micromechanics of fibroblast-populated fibrin constructs. Mater Res Soc Symp Proc. 2005;874:L7.10.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Mooney RG, Costales CA, Freeman EG, Curtin JM, Corrin AA, Lee JT, et al. Indentation micromechanics of three-dimensional fibrin/collagen biomaterial scaffolds. J Mater Res. 2006;21:2023–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Knight CG, Morton LF, Peachey AR, Tuckwell DS, Farndale RW, Barnes MJ. The collagen-binding A-domains of integrins alpha(1)beta(1) and alpha(2)beta(1) recognize the same specific amino acid sequence, GFOGER, in native (triple-helical) collagens. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:35–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Gailit J, Clarke C, Newman D, Tonnesen MG, Mosesson MW, Clark RA. Human fibroblasts bind directly to fibrinogen at RGD sites through integrin alpha(v)beta3. Exp Cell Res. 1997;232:118–26.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Scharffetter-Kochanek K, Klein CE, Heinen G, Mauch C, Schaefer T, Adelmann-Grill BC, et al. Migration of a human keratinocyte cell-line (HaCaT) to interstitial collagen type-I is mediated by the alpha-2-beta-1-integrin receptor. J Invest Dermatol. 1992;98:3–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Wells RG. The role of matrix stiffness in regulating cell behavior. Hepatology. 2008;47:1394–400.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Nayak S, Dey S, Kundu SC. Skin equivalent tissue-engineered construct: co-cultured fibroblasts/keratinocytes on 3D Matrices of sericin hope cocoons. PLoS One. 2013;8:e74779.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Sogabe Y, Abe M, Yokoyama Y, Ishikawa O. Basic fibroblast growth factor stimulates human keratinocyte motility by Rac activation. Wound Repair Regen. 2006;14:457–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Gailit J, Welch MP, Clark RA. TGF-beta-1 stimulates expression of keratinocyte integrins during reepithilialization of cutaneous wounds. J Invest Dermatol. 1994;103:221–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Kubo M, Van De Water L, Plantefaber LC, Mosesson MW, Simon M, Tonnesen MG, et al. Fibrinogen and fibrin are anti-adhesive for keratinocytes: a mechanism for fibrin eschar slough during wound repair. J Invest Dermatol. 2001;117:1369–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Larjava H, Haapasalmi K, Salo T, Wiebe C, Uitto VJ. Keratinocyte integrins in wound healing and chronic inflammation of the human periodontium. Oral Dis. 1996;2:77–86.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Pietenpol JA, Holt JT, Stein RW, Moses HL. Transforming growth factor beta 1 suppression of c-myc gene transcription: role in inhibition of keratinocyte proliferation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990;87:3758–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Draper BK, Komurasaki T, Davidson MK, Nanney LB. Epiregulin is more potent than EGF or TGF alpha in promoting in vitro wound closure due to enhanced ERK/MAPK activation. J Cell Biochem. 2003;89:1126–37.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Satish L, Yager D, Wells A. Glu-Leu-Arg-negative CXC chemokine interferon gamma inducible protein-9 as a mediator of epidermal-dermal communication during wound repair. J Invest Dermatol. 2003;120:1110–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Grinnell F. Fibroblast-collagen-matrix contraction: growth-factor signalling and mechanical loading. Trends Cell Biol. 2000;10:362–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Stevens MM, George JH. Exploring and engineering the cell surface interface. Science. 2005;310:1135–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Huang D, Chang TR, Aggarwal A, Lee RC, Ehrlich HP. Mechanisms and dynamics of mechanical strengthening in ligament-equivalent fibroblast-populated collagen matrices. Ann Biomed Eng. 1993;21:289–305.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Markowski MC, Brown AC, Barker TH. Directing epithelial to mesenchymal transition through engineered microenvironments displaying orthogonal adhesive and mechanical cues. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2012;100:2119–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Ghersi G, Dong H, Goldstein LA, Yeh Y, Hakkinen L, Larjava HS, et al. Regulation of fibroblast migration on collagenous matrix by a cell surface peptidase complex. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:29231–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Olaru F, Jensen LE. Chemokine expression by human keratinocyte cell lines after activation of Toll-like receptors. Exp Dermatol. 2010;19:e314–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Maas-Szabowski N, Stärker A, Fusenig NE. Epidermal tissue regeneration and stromal interaction in HaCaT cells is initiated by TGF-alpha. J Cell Sci. 2003;116:2937–48.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge funding support from the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number R21AR064437. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the funding sponsors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chase S. Linsley.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors have no financial conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

There are no animal experiments carried out for this article.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (TIFF 680 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Iyer, K., Chen, Z., Ganapa, T. et al. Keratinocyte Migration in a Three-Dimensional In Vitro Wound Healing Model Co-Cultured with Fibroblasts. Tissue Eng Regen Med 15, 721–733 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13770-018-0145-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13770-018-0145-7

Keywords

Navigation