Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Dose perturbation due to metallic breast expander in electron and photon beam treatment of breast cancer

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of Radiation Oncology

Abstract

Objective

The objective of this study is to investigate dose perturbations caused by metallic breast expander (MBE) and to compare the measurements with the treatment planning calculations in external beam radiotherapy.

Methods

A small water phantom with MBE was CT-scanned for treatment planning. Dose measurements were performed in the phantom with 6 and 15 MV photons and 9–22 MeV electrons in the water phantom and compared with treatment planning calculations.

Results

The measured dose for electron beam has pronounced backscatter (5 %) at the entrance and significant dose reduction up to 70 % on the exit side of the MBE, respectively. Monte Carlo calculation did not show backscatter, and the magnitude of the dose reduction was limited to only 30 %. The differences between measured and TPS are energy dependent that varied between −140 % and −80 % for 9–22 MeV beams. For photon beams, the backscatter dose perturbation is nearly the same for all algorithms as well as measurements, but in the transmission side, there are significant differences for all energies. The TPS algorithms are unable to show the effect of dose perturbation in photon beams that are generally 5–20 % lower in the breast tissue.

Conclusions

The dose perturbation in the presence of MBE was significant and could not be predicted with TPS. The differences could be due to CT electron density calibration and poor modeling in TPS algorithms for high-Z materials. It is concluded that high-Z materials should be avoided or measured data should be incorporated in the TPS for actual dose.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Krishnan L, Krishnan EC (1986) Electron beam irradiation after reconstruction with silicone gel implant in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 9(3):223–226

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kuske RR, Schuster R, Klein E, Young L, Perez CA, Fineberg B (1991) Radiotherapy and breast reconstruction: clinical results and dosimetry. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 21:339–346

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Klein EE, Kuske RR (1993) Changes in photon dose distributions due to breast prostheses. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 25(3):541–549

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Das IJ, Cheng CW, Mitra RK, Kassaee A, Tochner Z, Solin LJ (2004) Transmission and dose perturbations with high-Z materials in clinical electron beams. Med Phys 31(12):3213–3221

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Verhaegen F, Buffa FM, Deehan C (2001) Quantifying effect of lead shielding in electron beams: a Monte Carlo study. Phys Med Biol 46:757–769

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Khan FM, Werner BL, Deibel FC (1981) Lead shielding for electrons. Med Phys 8(5):712–713

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Damast S, Beal K, Ballangrud A, Losasso TJ, Cordeiro PG, Disa JJ, Hong L, McCormick BL (2006) Do metallic ports in tissue expanders affect postmastectomy radiation delivery? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 66(1):305–310

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Moni J, Graves-Ditman M, Cederna P, Griffith K, Krueger EA, Fraass BA, Pierce LJ (2004) Dosimetry around metallic ports in tissue expanders in patients receiving postmastectomy radiation therapy: an ex vivo evaluation. Med Dosim 29(1):49–54

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Thompson RC, Morgan AM (2005) Investigation into dosimetric effect of a MAGNA-SITE tissue expander on post-mastectomy radiotherapy. Med Phys 32(6):1640–1646

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chatzigiannis C, Lymperopoulou G, Sandilos P, Dardoufas C, Yakoumakis E, Georgiou E, Karaiskos P (2011) Dose perturbation in the radiotherapy of breast cancer patients implanted with the Magna-Site: a Monte Carlo study. J Appl Clin Med Phys 12(2):58–70

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cygler JE, Daskalov GM, Chan GH, Ding GX (2004) Evaluation of the first commercial Monte Carlo dose calculation engine for electron beam treatment planning. Med Phys 31(1):142–153

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ding GX, Duggan DM, Coffey CW, Shokrani P, Cygler JE (2006) First macro Monte Carlo based commercial dose calculation module for electron beam treatment planning—new issues for clinical consideration. Phys Med Biol 51(11):2781–2799

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Janna Andrews.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Srivastava, S.P., Cheng, CW., Andrews, J. et al. Dose perturbation due to metallic breast expander in electron and photon beam treatment of breast cancer. J Radiat Oncol 3, 65–72 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13566-013-0109-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13566-013-0109-4

Keywords

Navigation