Skip to main content
Log in

Dynamics of disruption and recovery in air transportation networks

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
CEAS Aeronautical Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Flight delays occur in the air transportation system when disruptive events such as weather, equipment outage, or congestion create an imbalance between system capacity and demand. These cycles of disruptions and subsequent recoveries can be viewed from a dynamical systems perspective: exogenous inputs (convective weather, airspace restrictions, etc.) disrupt the system, inducing delays and inefficiencies from which the system eventually recovers. We study these disruption and recovery cycles through a state-space representation that captures the severity and spatial impact of airport delays. In particular, using US airport delay data from 2008 to 2017, we first identify representative disruption and recovery cycles. These representative cycles provide insights into the common operational patterns of disruptions and recoveries in the system. We also relate these representative cycles to specific off-nominal events such as airport outages, and elucidate the differing disruption–recovery pathways for various off-nominal events. Finally, we explore temporal trends in terms of when and how the system tends to be disrupted, and the subsequent recovery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ball, M., Barnhart, C., Nemhauser, G., Odoni, A.: Air transportation: Irregular operations and control. Handbooks Oper. Res. Manag. Sci. 14, 1–67 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bureau of Transportation Statistics: Airline On-Time Statistics and Delay Causes (2020)

  3. Clark, K.L., Bhatia, U., Kodra, E.A., Ganguly, A.R.: Resilience of the US national airspace system airport network. IEEE Trans. Intell. Trans. Syst. 19(12), 3785–3794 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Clausen, J., Larsen, A., Larsen, J., Rezanova, N.J.: Disruption management in the airline industry-concepts, models and methods. Comput. Oper. Res. 37(5), 809–821 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cook, A., Delgado, L., Tanner, G., Cristóbal, S.: Measuring the cost of resilience. J. Air Trans. Manag. 56, 38–47 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA): Aviation system performance metrics (ASPM) website (2018)

  7. Gopalakrishnan, K., Li, M.Z., Balakrishnan, H.: Identification of outliers in graph signals. In: 58th Conference on Decision and Control (CDC). IEEE (2019)

  8. Janić, M.: Modelling the resilience, friability and costs of an air transport network affected by a large-scale disruptive event. Trans. Res. Part A: policy and practice 71, 1–16 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2014.10.023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kim, S., Lee, J., Oh, S., Yoon, Y.: Assessment of the volcanic hazard of Mt. Paektu explosion to international air traffic using South Korean airspace. Natural Hazards 96(2), 647–667 (2019)

  10. Li, M.Z., Gopalakrishnan, K., Pantoja, K., Balakrishnan, H.: Graph signal processing techniques for analyzing aviation disruptions. Trans. Sci. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.2020.1026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Li, M.Z., Gopalakrishnan, K., Wang, Y., Balakrishnan, H.: Outlier Analysis of Airport Delay Distributions in US and China. In: IEEE Artificial Intelligence and Data Analytics in Air Transportation Conference (2020)

  12. Mukherjee, B., Habib, M.F., Dikbiyik, F.: Network adaptability from disaster disruptions and cascading failures. IEEE Commun. Mag. 52(5), 230–238 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Office of Inspector General: Although FAA has taken steps to improve its operational contingency plane, significant work remains to mitigate the effects of major system disruptions. Tech. rep, OIG (2017)

  14. Palin, E.J., Scaife, A.A., Wallace, E., Pope, E.C., Arribas, A., Brookshaw, A.: Skillful seasonal forecasts of winter disruption to the UK transport system. J. Appl. Meteorol. Climatol. 55(2), 325–344 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Shavell, Z.A.: Effects of schedule disruptions on the economics of airline operations. Progress Astronaut. Aeronaut. 193, 115–126 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Suh, D., Ryerson, M.S.: A large neighborhood search heuristic to establish an optimal ad-hoc hubbing strategy in the wake of a large-scale airport outage. J. Air Trans. Manag. 65, 156–165 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wang, Y., Zhan, J., Xu, X., Li, L., Chen, P., Hansen, M.: Measuring the resilience of an airport network. Chin. J. Aeronaut. 32(12), 2694–2705 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Max Z. Li.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This work was supported in part by the National Science Foundation under CPS Award No. 1739505. Max Z. Li was also supported by the Wellington and Irene Loh Fund Fellowship, and an NSF Graduate Research Fellowship. Sang Hyun Shin and Darsh Jalan were supported by the Research Experiences for Undergraduates program at the Department of Industrial and Enterprise Systems Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 1.

Table 1 The seven representative DRTs and their features. Note that clusters are sorted in increasing order by the average DRT duration, i.e., \(\left|{\mathbb {T}}_{t^*}\right|\)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, M.Z., Gopalakrishnan, K., Balakrishnan, H. et al. Dynamics of disruption and recovery in air transportation networks. CEAS Aeronaut J 13, 347–357 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13272-021-00521-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13272-021-00521-x

Keywords

Navigation