Abstract
We show that, for a wide range of models, the empirical velocity of processive motor proteins has a limiting Pearson type VII distribution with finite mean but infinite variance. We develop maximum likelihood inference for this Pearson type VII distribution. In two simulation studies, we compare the performance of our MLE with the performance of standard Student’s t-based inference. The studies show that incorrectly assuming normality (1) can lead to imprecise inference regarding motor velocity in the one-sample case, and (2) can significantly reduce power in the two-sample case. These results should be of interest to experimentalists who wish to engineer motors possessing specific functional characteristics.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Atzberger, P., and Peskin, C. (2006), “A Brownian Dynamics Model of Kinesin in Three Dimensions Incorporating the Force-Extension Profile of the Coiled-Coil Cargo Tether,” Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, 68, 131–160.
Coles, S. (2001), An Introduction to Statistical Modeling of Extreme Values, London: Springer.
Devroye, L. (1986), Non-Uniform Random Variate Generation, New York: Springer.
Elston, T., and Peskin, C. (2000), “The Role of Protein Flexibility in Molecular Motor Function: Coupled Diffusion in a Tilted Periodic Potential,” SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, 60, 842–867.
Gabrielsen, G. (1982), “On the Unimodality of the Likelihood for the Cauchy Distribution: Some Comments,” Biometrika, 69, 677–678.
Goshima, G., and Vale, R. D. (2005), “Cell Cycle-Dependent Dynamics and Regulation of Mitotic Kinesins in Drosophila S2 Cells,” Molecular Biology of the Cell, 16, 3896–3907.
Hirokawa, N., and Takemura, R. (2003), “Biochemical and Molecular Characterization of Diseases Linked to Motor Proteins,” Trends in Biochemical Sciences, 28, 558–565.
Hirokawa, N., Pfister, K. K., Yorifuji, H., Wagner, M. C., Brady, S. T., and Bloom, G. S. (1989), “Submolecular Domains of Bovine Brain Kinesin Identified by Electron Microscopy and Monoclonal Antibody Decoration,” Cell, 56, 867–878.
Hughes, J., Hancock, W. O., and Fricks, J. (2011), “A Matrix Computational Approach to Kinesin Neck Linker Extension,” Journal of Theoretical Biology, 269, 181–194.
— (2012), “Kinesins with Extended Neck Linkers: A Chemomechanical Model for Variable-Length Stepping,” Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, 74, 1066–1097.
Ihaka, R., and Gentleman, R. (1996), “R: A Language for Data Analysis and Graphics,” Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 5, 299–314.
Kolomeisky, A., and Fisher, M. (2007), “Molecular Motors: A Theorist’s Perspective,” Annual Review of Physical Chemistry, 58, 675–695.
Kural, C., Balci, H., and Selvin, P. R. (2005), “Molecular Motors One at a Time: Fiona to the Rescue,” Journal of Physics. Condensed Matter, 17, S3979–S3995.
Kutys, M., Fricks, J., and Hancock, W. (2010), “Monte Carlo Analysis of Neck Linker Extension in Kinesin Molecular Motors,” PLoS Computational Biology, 6, e1000980.
Lilliefors, H. (1967), “On the Kolmogorov–Smirnov Test for Normality with Mean and Variance Unknown,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 62, 399–402.
Miki, H., Setou, M., Kaneshiro, K., and Hirokawa, N. (2001), “All Kinesin Superfamily Protein, KIF, Genes in Mouse and Human,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 98, 7004–7011.
Mogilner, A., Wang, H., Elston, T., and Oster, G. (2002), “Molecular Motors: Theory and Experiment,” in Computational Cell Biology, eds. C. Fall, E. Marland, J. Wagner and J. Tyson, New York: Springer.
Muthukrishnan, G., Zhang, Y., Shastry, S., and Hancock, W. (2009), “The Processivity of Kinesin-2 Motors Suggests Diminished Front-Head Gating,” Current Biology, 19, 442–447.
Pearson, K. (1895), “Contributions to the Mathematical Theory of Evolution. II. Skew Variation in Homogeneous Material,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series A: Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 186, 343–414.
— (1901), “Mathematical Contributions to the Theory of Evolution. X. Supplement to a Memoir on Skew Variation,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series A: Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 197, 443.
— (1916), “Mathematical Contributions to the Theory of Evolution. XIX. Second Supplement to a Memoir on Skew Variation,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series A: Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 216, 429–457.
Serfling, R., and Mazumder, S. (2009), “Exponential Probability Inequality and Convergence Results for the Median Absolute Deviation and Its Modifications,” Statistics & Probability Letters, 79, 1767–1773.
Shao, J. (2003), Mathematical Statistics, Berlin: Springer.
Shastry, S., and Hancock, W. O. (2010), “Neck Linker Length Determines the Degree of Processivity in Kinesin-1 and Kinesin-2 Motors,” Current Biology, 20, 939–943.
— (2011), “Interhead Tension Determines Processivity Across Diverse n-Terminal Kinesins,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108, 16253–16258.
Spudich, J. A., Rice, S. E., Rock, R. S., Purcell, T. J., and Warrick, H. M. (2011), “Optical Traps to Study Properties of Molecular Motors,” in Cold Spring Harbor Protocols, p. 2011.
Whitt, W. (2002), Stochastic-Process Limits: An Introduction to Stochastic-Process Limits and Their Application to Queues, Berlin: Springer.
Yang, J. T., Laymon, R. A., and Goldstein, L. S. (1989), “A Three-Domain Structure of Kinesin Heavy Chain Revealed by DNA Sequence and Microtubule Binding Analyses,” Cell, 56, 879–889.
Yildiz, A., Tomishige, M., Gennerich, A., and Vale, R. (2008), “Intramolecular Strain Coordinates Kinesin Stepping Behavior Along Microtubules,” Cell, 134, 1030–1041.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hughes, J., Shastry, S., Hancock, W.O. et al. Estimating Velocity for Processive Motor Proteins with Random Detachment. JABES 18, 204–217 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13253-013-0131-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13253-013-0131-4