Abstract
Diabetes is one of the metabolic diseases. Uncontrolled diabetes can lead to diabetic foot ulcers and if it was not treated would lead to amputation. Foot ulcers can be prevented by using suitable insoles which are made of appropriate material and geometrically designed by constituent layers. In this study, single-layer and three-layer insoles have been compared during static and dynamic loading. The selected materials were silicone gel (SG), plastazote foam (PLZ), polyfoam (PF) and ethyl vinyl acetate foam (EVA). Four single-layer and 18 combinations of three-layer insoles were selected. Materials behaviors were determined by using a uniaxial pressure test. The description of stress and strain is obtained by using the model of three dimensional nonlinear Finite Element Method (FEM). Then samples were tested by using commercially available plantar pressure measurement system. The FEM results showed that the SG and PLZ insoles are more appropriate compared to single-layer insoles. The combinations of PLZ, SG and EVA (from top to bottom) are recognized as the best between three-layer insoles. Also the best three-layer insole is more effective in promoting a favourable stress and strain distribution than single-layer insoles, especially in dynamic mode. According to simulation results, three-layer insole decreases stress concentration by 9 %. Also experimental tests showed that using three-layer insole decreases plantar pressure by 63 % compared to barefoot condition bare foot.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Smith KE, Commean PK, Mueller MJ, Robertson DD, Pilgram T, Johnson J (2000) Assessment of the diabetic foot using spiral computed tomography imaging and plantar pressure measurements: a technical report. J Rehabil Res Dev 37(1):31–40
Boulton AJM, Connor H, Cavanagh PR (2000) The foot in diabetes, chapter 11, 3rd edn. Wiley, Blackwell, p 131
Abu-Faraj ZO, Harris GF, Chang AH, Shereff MJ (1969) Evaluation of a rehabilitative pedorthic: plantar pressure alterations with scaphoid pad application. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng 4(4):328–336. doi:10.1109/86.547934
Cavanagh PR, Rodgers Iboshi A (1987) Pressure distribution under symptom free feet during barefoot standing. Foot Ankle 7:262–276
Bus SA, Ulbrecht JS, Cavanagh PR (2004) Pressure relief and load redistribution by custom-made insoles in diabetic patients with neuropathy and foot deformity. Clin Biomech 19(6):629–638
Putti AB, Arnold GP, Cochrane L (2007) The pedar in-shoe system: repeatability and normal pressure values. Gait Posture 25(3):401–405
Hennig EM (2002) The human foot during locomotion-applied research for footwear. Wei Lun Public Lecture, Hong Kong
Levangie PL, Norkin CC (2001) Joint structure and function, 3rd edn. F. A. Davis Company, Philadelphia, pp 367–403
Abdul Razak AH, Zayegh A, Begg RK, Wahab Y (2012) Foot plantar pressure measurement system: a review. Sensors 12(7):9884–9912. doi:10.3390/s120709884
Lemmon D, Shiang TY, Hashmi A, Ulbrecht JS, Cavanagh PR (1997) The effect of insoles in therapeutic foot wear—a finite element approach. J Biomech 30(6):615–620
Jacob S, Patil MK (1999) Three-dimensional foot modeling and analysis of stresses in normal and early stage Hansen’s disease with muscle paralysis. J Rehabil Res Dev 36(3):252–263
D’Agati M, Ladin Z (1997) Finite element analysis of the midsole of a running shoe. In: Dragan L, Wells R, Bechtold J (eds) Proceedings of 2nd North American congress of biomechanics, NACOB Organizing Committee, Chicago 26(3):320–329
Barani Z, Haghpanahi M, Katoozian H (2005) Three dimensional stress analysis of diabetic insole: a finite element approach. Technol Health Care 13(3):185–192
Petre MT, Erdemir A, Cavanagh PR (2006) Determination of elastomeric foam parameters for simulations of complex loading. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng 9(4):231–242
Cheung JT, Zhang M (2008) Parametric design of pressure-relieving foot orthosis using statistics-based finite element method. Med Eng Phys 30(3):269–277
Cheung JT, Zhang M (2006) Finite element modeling of the human foot and footwear. ABAQUS Users’ Conference
Jamshidi N, Hanife H, Rostami M, Najarian S, Menhaj MB, Saadatnia M, Salaami F (2010) Modelling the interaction of ankle–foot orthosis and foot by finite element methods to design optimized sole in steppage gait. J Med Eng Technol 34(2):116–123. doi:10.3109/03091900903402063
Jamshidi N, Rostami M, Najarian S (2012) Biomechanics of steppage gait. LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing AG & Co. KG Lap Lambert, Germany. Theodor-Heuss-Ring 26, 50668 Koln, Germany (International ISBN 978-3-8473-4735-4)
Owings TM, Woerner JL, Frampton JD, Cavanagh PR, Botek G (2008) Custom therapeutic insoles based on both foot shape and plantar pressure measurement provide enhanced pressure relief. Diabetes Care 31(5):839–844. doi:10.2337/dc07-2288
Lavery LA, Lanctot DL, Constantinides G, Zamorano RG, Athanasiou KA, Mauliagrawal C (2005) Wear and biomechanical characteristics of a novel shear-reducing insole with implications for high-risk persons with diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther 7(4):638–646. doi:10.1089/dia.2005.7.638
CATIA. http://catiadoc.free.fr/online/CATIA_P3_default.htm. Accessed 12 June 2014
ABAQUS. http://server-ifb147.ethz.ch:2080/v6.14/books/usi/default.htm?startat=pt03ch12s07hlb07.html. Accessed 12 June 2014
Chen WP, Ju CW, Tang FT (2003) Effects of total contact insoles on the plantar stress redistribution: a finite element analysis. Clin Biomech 18(6):17–24
Mijailovi N(Bristol, Avon), Gavrilovi M, Rafajlovi S (2009) Gait phases recognition from accelerations and ground reaction forces: application of neural networks. Telfor J 1(1):34–36
Ramanathan A, Kiran P, Arnold G (2010) Repeatability of the Pedar-X in-shoe pressure measuring system. Foot Ank Surg Foot Ankle Surg 16(2):70–73. doi:10.1016/j.fas.2009.05.006
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ghassemi, A., Mossayebi, A.R., Jamshidi, N. et al. Manufacturing and finite element assessment of a novel pressure reducing insole for Diabetic Neuropathic patients. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med 38, 63–70 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-014-0319-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-014-0319-0