Skip to main content
Log in

A phantom for verification of dwell position and time of a high dose rate brachytherapy source

  • Technical Paper
  • Published:
Australasian Physical & Engineering Sciences in Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Accuracy of dwell position and reproducibility of dwell time are critical in high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy. A phantom was designed to verify dwell position and dwell time reproducibility for an Ir-192 HDR stepping source using Computed Radiography (CR). The central part of the phantom, incorporating thin alternating strips of lead and acrylic, was used to measure dwell positions. The outer part of the phantom features recesses containing different absorber materials (lead, aluminium, acrylic and polystyrene foam), and was used for determining reproducibility of dwell times. Dwell position errors of <1 mm were easily detectable using the phantom. The effect of bending a transfer tube was studied with this phantom and no change of clinical significance was observed when varying the curvature of the transfer tube in typical clinical scenarios. Changes of dwell time as low as 0.1 s, the minimum dwell time of the treatment unit, could be detected by choosing dwell times over the four materials that produce identical exposure at the CR detector.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Houdek PV, Schwade JG, Wu X, Pisciotta V, Fiedler JA, Serago CF, Markoe AM, Abitbol AA, Lewin AA, Braunschweiger PG, Marshall DS (1992) Dose determination in high dose-rate brachytherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 24:795–801

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. DeWerd LA, Jursinic P, Kitchen R, Thomadsen BR (1995) Quality assurance tool for high dose rate brachytherapy. Med Phys 22:435–440

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Schaetzing R, Whiting BR, Lubinsky AR, Owen JF (1990) Digital radiography using storage phosphors. In: Digital imaging in diagnostic radiology, Churchill Livingston, New York, pp 107–138

  4. Sonoda M, Takano M, Miyahara J, Kato H (1983) Computed radiography utilizing scanning laser stimulated luminescence. Radiology 148:833–838

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Rowlands JA (2002) The physics of computed radiography. Phys Med Biol 47:R123–R166

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Samei E, Seibert JA, Willis CE, Flynn MJ, Mah E, Junck KL (2001) Performance evaluation of computed radiography systems. Med Phys 28:361–371

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kutcher GJ, Coia L, Gillin M, Hanson WF, Leibel S, Morton RJ, Palta JR, Purdy JA, Reinstein LE, Svensson GK, Weller M, Wingfield L (1994) Comprehensive QA for radiation oncology: Report of the AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group 40. Med Phys 21:581–618

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Klein EE, Hanley J, Bayouth J, Yin FF, Simon W, Dresser S, Serago C, Aguirre F, Ma L, Arjomandy B, Liu C, Sandin C, Holmes T (2009) Task group 142 report: quality assurance of medical accelerators. Med Phys 36:4197–4212

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Madebo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Madebo, M., Pillainayagam, J., Kron, T. et al. A phantom for verification of dwell position and time of a high dose rate brachytherapy source. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med 35, 335–339 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-012-0138-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-012-0138-0

Keywords

Navigation