Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Study of X-ray field junction dose using an a-Si electronic portal imaging device

  • Scientific Note
  • Published:
Australasian Physical & Engineering Sciences in Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Field junctions between megavoltage photon beams are important in modern radiotherapy for treatments such as head and neck and breast cancer. An electronic portal imaging device (EPID) may be used to study junction dose between two megavoltage X-ray fields. In this study, the junction dose was used to determine machine characteristics such as jaw positions and their reproducibility, collimator rotation and the effect of gantry rotation. All measurements were done on Varian linear accelerators with EPID (Varian, Palo Alto, CA). The results show reproducibility in jaw positions of approximately 0.3 mm for repeated jaw placement while EPID readings were reproducible within a standard deviation of 0.4% for fixed jaw positions. Junction dose also allowed collimator rotation error of 0.1° to be observed. Dependence of junction dose on gantry rotation due to gravity was observed; the gravity effect being maximum at 180° gantry angle (beam pointing up). EPIDs were found to be reliable tools for checking field junctions, which in turn may be used to check jaw reproducibility and collimator rotation of linacs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Antonuk LE (2002) Electronic portal imaging devices: a review and historical perspective of contemporary technologies and research. Phys Med Biol 47(6):R31–R65

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kirby MC, Williams PC (1995) The use of an electronic portal imaging device for exit dosimetry and quality control measurements. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 31:593–603

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Liu G, van Doorn T, Bezak E (2002) Assessment of flatness and symmetry of megavoltage X-ray beam with an electronic portal imaging device (EPID). Australas Phys Eng Sci Med 25:58–66

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Samant SS, Zheng W, Parra NA, Chandler J, Gopal A, Wu J, Jain J, Zhu Y, Sontag M (2002) Verification of multileaf collimator leaf positions using an electronic portal imaging device. Med Phys 29:2900–2912

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Clarke MF, Budgell GJ (2008) Use of an amorphous silicon EPID for measuring MLC calibration at varying gantry angle. Phys Med Biol 53:473–485

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Curtin-Savard A, Podgorsak EB (1997) An electronic portal imaging device as a physics tool. Med Dosim 22:101–105

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Budgell GJ, Zhang R, Mackay RI (2007) Daily monitoring of linear accelerator beam parameters using an amorphous silicon EPID. Phys Med Biol 52:1721–1733

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Vieira SC, Bolt RA, Dirkx ML, Visser AG, Heijmen BJ (2006) Fast, daily linac verification for segmented IMRT using electronic portal imaging. Radiother Oncol 80:86–92

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Holmberg O, Huizenga H, Idzes MH, Lebesque JV, Vijlbrief RE, Mijnheer BJ (1994) In vivo determination of the accuracy of field matching in breast cancer irradiation using an electronic portal imaging device. Radiother Oncol 33:157–166

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Greer PB, Barnes MP (2007) Investigation of an amorphous silicon EPID for measurement and quality assurance of enhanced dynamic wedge. Phys Med Biol 52:1075–1087

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Van Esch A, Depuydt T, Huyskens DP (2004) The use of an aSi-based EPID for routine absolute dosimetric pre-treatment verification of dynamic IMRT fields. Radiother Oncol 71:223–234

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. van Zijtveld M, Dirkx ML, de Boer HC, Heijmen BJ (2006) Dosimetric pre-treatment verification of IMRT using an EPID; clinical experience. Radiother Oncol 81:168–175

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Zeng GG, Heaton RK, Catton CN, Chung PW, O’Sullivan B, Lau M, Parent A, Jaffray DA (2007) A two isocentre IMRT technique with a controlled junction dose for long volume targets. Phys Med Biol 52:4541–4552

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Rosenthal DI, McDonough J, Kassaee A (1998) The effect of independent collimator misalignment on the dosimetry of abutted half-beam blocked fields for the treatment of head and neck cancer. Radiother Oncol 49:273–278

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Saw C, Krishna K, Enke C, Hussey D (2000) Dosimetric evaluation of abutted fields using asymmetric collimators for treatment of head and neck. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 47:821–824

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lee PC (1997) Consistent collimator overlaps in field matching with computer-controlled X-ray collimator. Med Dosim 22:59–61

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kron T, Barnes K, O’Brien P (2003) Multicentre dosimetric comparison of photon-junctioning techniques in head and neck radiotherapy. Australas Radiol 47(3):289–294

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kron T (2000) The potential for symmetric field placement errors when using asymmetric collimation for photon field junction. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med 23(2):58–60

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Physical Sciences, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Locked Bag 1 A’Beckett Street, Melbourne, VIC, 8006, Australia

    Mebratu Madebo, A. Perkins, C. Fox & T. Kron

  2. RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia

    Mebratu Madebo, P. Johnston & T. Kron

  3. The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia

    A. Perkins

  4. ARPANSA, Melbourne, Australia

    P. Johnston

Authors
  1. Mebratu Madebo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. Perkins
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. C. Fox
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. P. Johnston
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. T. Kron
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mebratu Madebo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Madebo, M., Perkins, A., Fox, C. et al. Study of X-ray field junction dose using an a-Si electronic portal imaging device. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med 33, 45–50 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-010-0005-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-010-0005-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation