Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A case study of a patient with MS followed for 15 years using patient-reported outcome measures

  • Case Report
  • Published:
Journal of Medicine and the Person

Abstract

Patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments have grown in popularity because they provide unique information to help evaluate healthcare services from the patient’s perspective. The objective of this case study is to present the utility of both qualitative and quantitative self-reported data collected over time in describing disease progression, managing treatment, and assessing quality of life in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). A 62-year-old female with relapsing-remitting MS was followed longitudinally for 15 years by the same neurologist and physiatrist who used magnetic resonance images to monitor her lesions and the neurologist-administered EDSS instrument to monitor her disability. Concurrently, the patient kept track of her symptoms, feelings, moods, treatments, side effects and outcomes of care through diaries and used the comprehensive LIFEwareSM System self-reported, symptom-oriented questionnaires (assessments) to track her functional health status and quality of life. Medical records, EDSS scores, LIFEware® self-reported measures along with diary entries for the period were reviewed. Self-reported data, as well as clinician assessed data, are both key to comprehensively treating a patient with MS. By incorporating PRO measures into practice, a physician can address significant self-reported symptoms, minimize limitations, maintain function, enhance quality of life and provide more holistic disease management treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Baker JG, Granger CV, Fiedler RC (1997) A brief outpatient functional assessment measure: validity using Rasch measures. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 76(1):8–13

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Granger CV (1999) Featured instrument. The LIFEware System. J Rehabil 3(2):63–69

    Google Scholar 

  3. Granger CV, Lackner JM, Kulas M, Russell CF (2003) Outpatients with low back pain: an analysis of the rate per day of pain improvement that may be expected and factors affecting improvement. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 82(4):253–260

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Granger CV, Carlin M (2005) The LIFEware System and Rasch analysis: evaluating functional status of multiple sclerosis patients. In: Bezruczko N (ed) Rasch measurement in health sciences. JAM Press, Maple Grove, pp 260–276

    Google Scholar 

  5. Granger CV, Gilewski M, Carlin M (2010) Measures of functional performance. In: Mpofu E, Oakland T (eds) Rehabilitation and health assessment: applying ICF guidelines. Springer, New York, pp 547–668

    Google Scholar 

  6. Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation (2004) The LIFEwareSM System Clinical Guide, Version 1.1. UDSMR, Buffalo

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paulette Niewczyk.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Niewczyk, P., Granger, C., Brownscheidle, C.M. et al. A case study of a patient with MS followed for 15 years using patient-reported outcome measures. J Med Pers 10, 34–38 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12682-012-0111-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12682-012-0111-4

Keywords

Navigation