Abstract
Responding to increased global research interest in teacher educators’ professional lives, this study explores the resilience of Teaching–Research Officers, a characteristic type of teacher educators, in the context of mainland China. Based on survey data collected from a nationally representative sample (N = 5489), the results show that the Teaching–Research Officers surveyed generally favourably evaluated their resilience, as measured by their efficacy beliefs and work engagement, and that their resilience was significantly influenced by various personal, situated, and professional factors. This study extends the research on teacher resilience and provides quantitative evidence supporting the existing conceptual framework. The findings call for attention to be paid to the roles of professional development programmes and research-related job requirements for teacher educators. The study’s limitations and directions for future research are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ainsworth, S., & Oldfield, J. (2019). Quantifying teacher resilience: Context matters. Teaching and Teacher Education,82, 117–128.
Aspfors, J., & Fransson, G. (2015). Research on mentor education for mentors of newly qualified teachers: A qualitative meta-synthesis. Teaching and Teacher Education,48, 75–86.
Beltman, S., Mansfield, C., & Price, A. (2011). Thriving not just surviving: A review of research on teacher resilience. Educational Research Review,6(3), 185–207.
Buitink, J. (2009). What and how do student teachers learn during school-based teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education,25(1), 118–127.
Bullough, R. V., Jr. (2005). Being and becoming a mentor: School-based teacher educators and teacher educator identity. Teaching and Teacher Education,21(2), 143–155.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2006). Constructing 21st-century teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education,57(3), 300–314.
Day, C., & Gu, Q. (2007). Variations in the conditions for teachers’ professional learning and development: Sustaining commitment and effectiveness over a career. Oxford Review of Education,33(4), 423–443.
Day, C., & Gu, Q. (2009). Veteran teachers: Commitment, resilience and quality retention. Teachers and Teaching,15(4), 441–457.
Day, C., & Kington, A. (2008). Identity, well-being and effectiveness: The emotional contexts of teaching. Pedagogy, Culture & Society,16(1), 7–23.
Finney, S. J., & DiStefano, C. (2006). Non-normal and categorical data in structural equation modeling. In G. R. Hancock & R. O. Mueller (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: A second course (pp. 269–314). Greenwich, CT: IAP.
Gu, Q. (2014). The role of relational resilience in teachers’ career-long commitment and effectiveness. Teachers and Teaching,20(5), 502–529.
Gu, Q., & Day, C. (2007). Teachers resilience: A necessary condition for effectiveness. Teaching and Teacher education,23(8), 1302–1316.
Gu, Q., & Day, C. (2013). Challenges to teacher resilience: Conditions count. British Educational Research Journal,39(1), 22–44.
Hadar, L. L., & Brody, D. L. (2016). Talk about student learning: Promoting professional growth among teacher educators. Teaching and Teacher Education,59, 101–114.
Han, X. (2012). Big moves to improve the quality of teacher education in China. On the Horizon,20(4), 324–335.
Hargreaves, A. (1998). The emotional practice of teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education,14(8), 835–854.
Hastings, W. (2008). I felt so guilty: Emotions and subjectivity in school-based teacher education. Teachers and Teaching,14(5–6), 497–513.
Hong, J. Y. (2012). Why do some beginning teachers leave the school, and others stay? Understanding teacher resilience through psychological lenses. Teachers and Teaching,18(4), 417–440.
Hu, H., & Wang, M. (2017). The roles of Teaching Research Officers under curriculum reform: A case study of one county-level Teaching Research Officer. Global Education,46(12), 85–100. (in Chinese).
Kelchtermans, G., Smith, K., & Vanderlinde, R. (2018). Towards an ‘international forum for teacher educator development’: An agenda for research and action. European Journal of Teacher Education,41(1), 120–134.
Klassen, R. M., & Chiu, M. M. (2010). Effects on teachers’ self-efficacy and job satisfaction: Teacher gender, years of experience, and job stress. Journal of Educational Psychology,102(3), 741–756.
Korthagen, F., Loughran, J., & Lunenberg, M. L. (2005). Teaching teachers – Studies into expertise of teacher educators: An introduction to this theme issue. Teaching and Teacher Education,21(2), 107–115.
Lai, M. (2010). Teacher development under curriculum reform: A case study of a secondary school in mainland China. International Review of Education,56(5–6), 613–631.
Loughran, J. (2014). Professionally developing as a teacher educator. Journal of Teacher Education,65(4), 271–283.
Mansfield, C. F., Beltman, S., Broadley, T., & Weatherby-Fell, N. (2016). Building resilience in teacher education: An evidenced informed framework. Teaching and Teacher Education,54, 77–87.
Mayer, D., Mitchell, J., Santoro, N., & White, S. (2011). Teacher educators and ‘accidental’ careers in academe: An Australian perspective. Journal of Education for Teaching,37(3), 247–260.
Ministry of Education, PRC. (1990). Several suggestions for improving and strengthening the work of Teaching and Research Offices. ([1990]013). Retrieved from http://ncct.moe.edu.cn/2012/policyDocumentRes_0619/959.html. Accessed 22 Aug 2018 (in Chinese).
Ministry of Education, PRC. (2019). Suggestions for enhancing and improving basic education teaching research work in the new era. ([2019]14). Retrieved from http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A06/s3321/201911/t20191128_409950.html. Accessed 6 Jan 2020 (in Chinese).
Murray, J., & Kosnik, C. (2011). Academic work and identities in teacher education. Journal of Education for Teaching,37(3), 243–246.
Näring, G., Vlerick, P., & Van de Ven, B. (2012). Emotion work and emotional exhaustion in teachers: The job and individual perspective. Educational Studies,38(1), 63–72.
OECD. (2015). Results from TALIS 2013-2014: Shanghai (China) country note. OECD. Retrieved June 25, 2014, from http://www.oecd.org/education/school/TALIS-2014-country-note-Shanghai.pdf.
Park, I. (2005). Teacher commitment and its effects on student achievement in American high schools. Educational Research and Evaluation,11(5), 461–485.
Sammons, P., Day, C., Kington, A., Gu, Q., Stobart, G., & Smees, R. (2007). Exploring variations in teachers’ work, lives and their effects on pupils: key findings and implications from a longitudinal mixed-method study. British Educational Research Journal,33(5), 681–701.
Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-Romá, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies,3(1), 71–92.
Schleicher, A. (2011). Building a high-quality teaching profession: Lessons from around the world. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264113046-en.
Scholz, U., Doña, B. G., Sud, S., & Schwarzer, R. (2002). Is general self-efficacy a universal construct? Psychometric findings from 25 countries. European Journal of Psychological Assessment,18(3), 242–251.
Schreiber, J. B., Nora, A., Stage, F. K., Barlow, E. A., & King, J. (2006). Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: A review. The Journal of Educational Research,99(6), 323–338.
Schwarzer, R. (2014). Self-efficacy: Thought control of action. New York: Routledge.
Schwarzer, R., Born, A., Iwawaki, S., Lee, Y.-M., Saito, E., & Yue, X. (1997). The assessment of optimistic self-beliefs: Comparison of the Chinese, Indonesian, Japanese and Korean versions of the General Self-Efficacy Scale. Psychologia,40(1), 1–13.
Sellar, S., & Lingard, B. (2013). Looking East: Shanghai, PISA 2009 and the reconstitution of reference societies in the global education policy field. Comparative Education,49(4), 464–485.
Smith, K. (2003). So, what about the professional development of teacher educators? European Journal of Teacher Education,26(2), 201–215.
Song, H. (2012). On the new roles of the Teaching Research Officers as professional leaders in China. Teacher Education Research,24(1), 18–24. (in Chinese).
Swennen, A., Lunenberg, M., & Korthagen, F. (2008). Preach what you teach! Teacher educators and congruent teaching. Teachers and Teaching,14(5–6), 531–542.
Tsui, A., & Wong, J. L. N. (2009). In search of a third space: Teacher development in mainland China. In C. K. K. Chan & N. Rao (Eds.), Revisiting the Chinese learner: Changing contexts, changing education (pp. 281–311). Hong Kong: CERC/Springer.
Van der Klink, M., Kools, Q., Avissar, G., White, S., & Sakata, T. (2017). Professional development of teacher educators: What do they do? Findings from an explorative international study. Professional Development in Education,43(2), 163–178.
Vanassche, E., & Kelchtermans, G. (2014). Teacher educators’ professionalism in practice: Positioning theory and personal interpretative framework. Teaching and Teacher Education,44, 117–127.
Wong, J. L. (2012). How has recent curriculum reform in China influenced school-based teacher learning? An ethnographic study of two subject departments in Shanghai, China. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education,40(4), 347–361.
Yang, X. (2018). An investigation on the job pressure of Teaching Research Officers and its sources. Shanghai Research on Education,12, 32–37. (in Chinese).
Yin, H. (2015). The effect of teachers’ emotional labour on teaching satisfaction: Moderation of emotional intelligence. Teachers and Teaching, 21(7), 789–810.
Yin, H., & Lee, J. C. K. (2011). Emotions matter: Teachers’ feelings about their interactions with teacher trainers during curriculum reform. Chinese Education & Society, 44(4), 82–97.
Yin, H., Huang, S., & Lee, J. C. K. (2017). Choose your strategy wisely: Examining the relationships between emotional labor in teaching and teacher efficacy in Hong Kong primary schools. Teaching and Teacher Education, 66, 127–136.
Zeichner, K. (2006). Reflections of a university-based teacher educator on the future of college-and university-based teacher education. Journal of teacher education,57(3), 326–340.
Zeichner, K. (2010). Rethinking the connections between campus courses and field experiences in college-and university-based teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education,61(1–2), 89–99.
Zembylas, M. (2003). Emotions and teacher identity: A poststructural perspective. Teachers and Teaching,9(3), 213–238.
Zhang, M., & Kong, L. (2012). An exploration of reasons for Shanghai’s success in the OECD Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2009. Frontiers of Education in China,7(1), 124–162.
Funding
This work was supported by the Ministry of Education Key Research Base of Humanities and Social Sciences at Universities under the Key Program “Reconstructing the Teaching and Research System in Schools to Promote Classroom Transformation” [Grant Number 16JJD880024].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix: The scales used in the study
Appendix: The scales used in the study
TROs’ self-efficacy
-
1.
I can always manage to solve difficult problems in teaching–research work if I try hard enough.
-
2.
If a teacher opposes me, I can find the means and ways to get what I want.
-
3.
It is easy for me to stick to my aims at teaching–research work and accomplish my goals on teaching–research work.
-
4.
I am confident that I could deal efficiently with unexpected events in teaching–research work.
-
5.
Thanks to my resourcefulness, I know how to handle unforeseen situations in teaching–research work.
-
6.
I can solve most problems in teaching–research work if I invest the necessary effort.
-
7.
I can remain calm when facing difficulties because I can rely on my coping abilities in teaching–research work.
-
8.
When I am confronted with a problem in teaching–research work, I can usually find several solutions.
-
9.
If I am in trouble in teaching–research work, I can usually think of a solution.
-
10.
I can usually handle whatever comes my way in teaching–research work.
TROs’ work engagement
Vigour
-
1.
When I get up in the morning, I feel like going to work.
-
2.
At my job in teaching–research organization, I feel strong and vigorous.
-
3.
At my teaching–research work, I always persevere, even when things do not go well.
-
4.
I can continue working for very long periods at a time.
-
5.
At my teaching–research job, I am very resilient, mentally.
-
6.
At my teaching–research work, I feel that I am bursting with energy.
Dedication
-
1.
To me, my teaching–research job is challenging.
-
2.
My teaching–research job inspires me.
-
3.
I am enthusiastic about my teaching–research job.
-
4.
I am proud of the teaching–research work that I do.
-
5.
I find the teaching–research work that I do full of meaning and purpose.
Absorption
-
1.
When I am working on teaching–research, I forget everything else around me.
-
2.
Time flies when I’m working on teaching–research.
-
3.
I get carried away when I’m working on teaching–research.
-
4.
It is difficult to detach myself from my teaching–research job.
-
5.
I am immersed in my on teaching–research work.
-
6.
I feel happy when I am working on teaching–research intensely.
Work environment
-
1.
To what extent does management style of teaching–research office influence results of teaching–research work?
-
2.
To what extent does assignment of responsibility of TROs influence results of teaching–research work?
-
3.
To what extent do resources of teaching–research office (such as outlay, working conditions and so on) influence results of teaching–research work?
-
4.
To what extent does interpersonal relationship and organizational climate of teaching–research office influence results of teaching–research work?
Training workload
-
1.
How many collective investigations (Jiti Diaoyan) or collective inspection of teaching (Jiti Jiaoxue Shidao) did you carry out in the last semester?
-
2.
How many individual investigations (Geren Diaoyan) did you carry out in the last semester?
-
3.
How many schools (Dundian Xiao, Jidi Xiao, and Shiyan Xiao) did you fixedly guide teaching–research and school improvement of in the last semester?
-
4.
How many model lessons (Shifan Ke) did you teach for elementary and secondary school teachers in the last semester?
-
5.
How many lessons did you observe and evaluate in the last semester?
-
6.
How many lectures did you deliver in the last semester?
-
7.
How many teaching–research activities did you organize in your area in the last semester?
-
8.
How many teaching competitions between teachers did you organize in your area in this school year?
-
9.
How many academic competitions between students did you organize in this school year?
-
10.
How many teachers won city-level awards in teaching competitions under your guidance in this school year?
-
11.
How many teachers won provincial and ministerial-level awards in teaching competitions under your guidance in this school year?
Research workload
-
1.
How many research projects funded by the central government (including the National Social Sciences Fund Research Project, the National Education Science Planning Research Project, the Chinese Ministry of Education Humanities and Social Sciences Research Project, and research projects funded by other national ministries and commissions) did you have in this school year ?
-
2.
How many research projects funded by a provincial government (including provincial philosophy and social science research projects, provincial education science planning research projects, and research projects funded by provincial departments of education) did you have in this school year?
-
3.
How many research projects funded by a municipal government did you have in this school year?
-
4.
How many research projects funded by a district government did you have in this school year?
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yin, H., Xie, C., Hu, H. et al. Demystifying and sustaining the resilience of teacher educators: the perspectives of Teaching–Research Officers in China. Asia Pacific Educ. Rev. 21, 311–323 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-020-09626-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-020-09626-0