Skip to main content
Log in

Characterizing spatial variability of soil properties in salt affected coastal India using geostatistics and kriging

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Arabian Journal of Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Soil salinization is a major problem affecting 955 Mha globally and 7 Mha in India. Soil properties vary spatially and knowing the extent of spatial variability of soil physicochemical characteristics is highly essential for management of these soils and crop cultivation. This study was conducted in salt-affected coastal parts of eastern India, with the following objectives: (i) to explore the spatial variability of soil properties (soil electrical conductivity (ECe), soil pH, soil organic carbon (SOC), available soil nitrogen, available soil phosphorus, and available soil potassium) and fitting the semivariogram models; (ii) to estimate the values of soil properties at unsampled locations using geostatistical tools; and (iii) to prepare the spatial maps of soil properties using parameters of best fit semivariogram model and interpolation by ordinary kriging technique. A total of 132 soil samples were collected. Gaussian, exponential, circular, spherical, K-Bessel, and spherical semivariogram models were found to be the best fit for assessing the spatial variability in ECe, soil pH, SOC, available soil nitrogen, available soil phosphorus, and available soil potassium, respectively. The best fit model parameters were used to create the spatial maps for these soil properties by ordinary kriging. It was concluded that geostatistical and kriging tools can be used to estimate the value of soil properties at unsampled locations and ultimately to develop spatial maps for site-specific nutrient management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amirinejad AA, Kamble K, Aggarwal P, Chakraborty D, Pradhan S, Mittal RB (2011) Assessment and mapping of spatial variation of soil physical health in a farm. Geoderma 160:292–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Behera SK, Singh MV, Singh KN, Sandeep T (2011) Distribution variability of total and extractable zinc in cultivated acid soils of India and their relationship with some selected soil properties. Geoderma 162:242–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bray RH, Kurtz LT (1945) Determination of total, organic and available forms of phosphorus in soils. Soil Sci 59:39–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burrough PA (1993) Soil variability: a late 20th century view. Soil Fertil 56:529–562

    Google Scholar 

  • Cambardella CA, Moorman TB, Novak JM, Parkin TB, Karlen DL, Turco RF, Konopka AE (1994) Field-scale variability of soil properties in central Iowa soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 58:1501–1511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cemek B, Gueler M, Kilic K, Demir Y, Arslan H (2007) Assessment of spatial variability in some soil properties as related to soil salinity and alkalinity in Bafra plain in northern Turkey. Environ Monit Assess 124:223–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dodge Y (2003) The oxford dictionary of statistical terms, OUP ISBN 0-19-920613-9

  • Emadi M, Baghernejad M, Maftoun M (2008) Assessment of some soil properties by spatial variability in saline and sodic soils in Arsanjan plain, Southern Iran. Pak J Biol Sci 11:238–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernández Buces N, Siebe C, Cram S, Palacio JL (2006) Mapping soil salinity using a combined spectral response index for bare soil and vegetation: a case study in the former lake Texcoco, Mexico. J Arid Environ 65(4):644–667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foroughifar H, Jafarzadeh AA, Torabi H, Pakpour A, Miransari M (2013) Using geostatistics and geographic information system techniques to characterize spatial variability of soil properties, including micronutrients. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 44(8):1273–1281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goovaerts P (1999) Using elevation to aid the geostatistical mapping of rainfall erosivity. Catena 34:227–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanway JJ, Heidel H (1952) Soil analyses methods as used in Iowa State College Soil Testing Laboratory. Iowa Agric 57:1–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Heuvelink GBM, Webster R (2001) Modelling soil variation: past, present, and future. Geoderma 100:269–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson RD, Bell MM, Gratton C (2007) Assessing ecosystem variance at different scales to generalize about pasture management in southern Wisconsin. Agric Ecosyst Environ 122:471–478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerry R, Oliver MA (2003) Variograms of ancillary data to aid sampling for soil surveys. . Precis Agricult 4:253–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keshavarzi A, Sarmadian F, Ahmadi A (2011) Spatially-based model of land suitability analysis using block kriging. Aust J Crop Sci 5:1533

    Google Scholar 

  • Krasilnikov P, Sidorova V (2008) Geostatistical analysis of the spatial structure of acidity and organic carbon in zonal soils of the Russian plain. In soil geography and geostatistics: concepts and applications Luxembourg: European Commission p 55–67.

  • Lesch SM, Rhoades JD, Lund LJ, Corwin DL (1992) Mapping soil salinity using electromagnetic measurements. Soil Sci Soc Am J 56(2):540–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu X, Zhang W, Zhang M, Ficklin DL, Wang F (2009) Spatio-temporal variations of soil nutrients influenced by an altered land tenure system in China. Geoderma 152:23–34

  • Lopez-Granados F, Jurado-Exposito M, Atenciano S, Garcıa-Ferrer A, Sanchez de la Orden M, Garcıa-Torres L (2002) Spatial variability of agricultural soil parameters in southern Spain. Plant Soil 246:97–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marko K, Al-Amri NS, Elfeki AMM (2014) Geostatistical analysis using GIS for mapping groundwater quality: case study in the recharge area of Wadi Usfan, western Saudi Arabia. Arab J Geosci 7(12):5239–5252. doi:10.1007/s12517-013-1156-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metternicht GI, Zinck JA (2003) Remote sensing of soil salinity: potentials and constraints. Remote Sens Environ 85:1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mousavifard SM, Momtaz H, Sepehr E, Davatgar N, Sadaghiani MHR (2012) Determining and mapping some soil physico-chemical properties using geostatistical and GIS techniques in the Naqade region, Iran. Arch Agron Soil Sci. doi:10.1080/03650340.2012.740556

    Google Scholar 

  • Pang S, Li TX, Zhang XF, Wang YD, Yu HY (2011) Spatial variability of cropland lead and its influencing factors: a case study in Shuangliu county, Sichuan province, China. Geoderma 162:223–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson TP, Metternicht G (2006) Testing the performance of spatial interpolation techniques for mapping soil properties. Comput Electron Agric 50:97–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahu GC, Antaryami M (2005) Soil of Orissa and its management. Orissa Rev:56–60

  • Santra P, Chopra UK, Chakraborty D (2008) Spatial variability of soil properties and its application in predicting surface map of hydraulic parameters in an agricultural farm. Curr Sci 95(7):937–945

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma RC, Rao BRM and Saxena RK (2004) Salt affected soils in India-current assessment. In: Advances in sodic land reclamation, pp.1–26. International conference on sustainable management of sodic lands, held on 9–14 February at Lucknow, India.

  • Shi W, Liu J, Du Z, Song Y, Chen C, Yue T (2009) Surface modelling of soil pH. Geoderma 150:113–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Subbiah BV, Asija GL (1956) A rapid procedure for the determination of the available nitrogen in the soil. Curr Sci 25:259–260

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Salinity Laboratory (1954) Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkali soils. Handbook 60. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Walkley A, Black IA (1934) An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter, and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci 34:29–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walter C, McBratney AB, Douaoui A, Minasny B (2001) Spatial prediction of topsoil salinity in the Chelif Valley, Algeria, using local ordinary kriging with local variograms versus whole-area variogram. Soil Res 39:259–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webster R, Oliver MA (2007) Geostatistics for environmental scientists, 2nd edn. Wiley, Chichester ISBN 9780470028582

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang XY, Sui YY, Zhang XD, Meng K, Herbert SJ (2007) Spatial variability of nutrient properties in black soil of northeast China. Pedosphere 17:19–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Director of Central Rice Research Institute for providing the laboratory facilities and Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi, for providing financial support in conducting this study. Technical help provided by Chandan Kumar Ojha and Brindaban Das is also acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rahul Tripathi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tripathi, R., Nayak, A.K., Shahid, M. et al. Characterizing spatial variability of soil properties in salt affected coastal India using geostatistics and kriging. Arab J Geosci 8, 10693–10703 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-015-2003-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-015-2003-4

Keywords

Navigation