Skip to main content
Log in

Developing Drought Planning Components to Secure Community Resilience

  • Water Resources and Hydrologic Engineering
  • Published:
KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although we have made great efforts to reduce drought impacts, socio-economic damage has increased in recent years due to climate change, which has led to increasing frequency and intensity of drought. However, a community that has strong resilience to drought can recover, even from a long-lasting extreme drought, without severe damage. In the field of disaster management, resilience is the ability of a community to return to pre-disaster conditions. To ensure the resilience of a community, systematic drought planning is needed. Even though it is not possible to fully eliminate drought impacts, they can be reduced through systematic approaches such as drought planning. Drought planning requires linkages among sectoral and organizational measures to minimize vulnerabilities. In South Korea, water resources management is quite important because annual rainfall is concentrated during the summer monsoon season, so continuous monitoring and drought analysis are needed during the spring dry season. During the last several decades, the paradigm of drought response has changed and various measures have been implemented. This study analyzed the contents of the national drought plan in comparison with the state drought guidelines of the United States and lessons learned from extreme droughts in 2014–2015. In addition, we investigated how to ensure community resilience to droughts, including robustness, redundancy, rapidity, and resourcefulness. In conclusion, we proposed six essential components that form the basic framework of comprehensive regional drought planning in South Korea: monitoring, vulnerability analysis, mitigation, response, management, and updating.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • CDSRH (2015) Guidelines for responding to drought-related departments. Central Disaster and Safety Response Headquarter, Sejong, Korea

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling CS (1973) Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 4(1):1–23, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KEI (2015) Urban climate resilience: operationalization and evaluation (I). Korea Environment Institute, Sejong, Korea

    Google Scholar 

  • KOICA (2012) Humanitarian assistance policy and business study: Focused on emergency relief system. Korea International Cooperation Agency, Seongnam, Korea

    Google Scholar 

  • K-water (2016) K-water drought white paper for the western part of Chungcheongnam-do. Korea Water Resources Corporation, Daejeon, Korea

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Environment (2016) Drinking water risk management standard manual. Ministry of Environment, Seoul, Korea

    Google Scholar 

  • MLIT (2015) Drought record survey report. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, and Transport, Seoul, Korea

    Google Scholar 

  • MLTM (2011) Long-term comprehensive plan for water resources. Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs, Seoul, Korea

    Google Scholar 

  • MPSS (2015) Drought Risk management standard manual. Ministry of Public Safety and Security, Seoul, Korea

    Google Scholar 

  • Timmerman P (1981) Vulnerability, resilience and collapse of society: A review of models and possible climate application, Environmental Monograph No. 1. Institute for Environmental Studies, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.3370010412

    Google Scholar 

  • UNISDR (2009). Drought risk reduction framework and practices: Contribution to the implementation of Hyogo framework for action. United Nations Secretariat of the International Strategy for Disaster Reduction, Lincoln, NE, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • USDIBR (2016) Drought response program framework: WaterSMART Program, U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation, Washington, DC, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilhite DA (1991) Drought planning: A process for state government. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 27(1):29–38, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.1991.tb03110.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilhite DA (2006) Drought monitoring and early warning: Concepts, progress and future challenges. World Meteorological Organization, WMO, Geneva, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilhite DA, Glantz MH (1985) Understanding: The drought phenomenon: The role of definitions. Water International 10(3):111–120, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02508068508686328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Meteorological Organization (WMO) (2009) Experts agree on a universal drought index to cope with climate risks. WMO Press Release, World Meteorological Organization, WMO, Geneva, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Korea Environment Industry & Technology Institute (KEITI) through Advanced Water Management Research Program, funded by Korea Ministry of Environment (Grant. 83070).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tae-Woong Kim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Park, DH., Lee, JY., Yoo, J. et al. Developing Drought Planning Components to Secure Community Resilience. KSCE J Civ Eng 24, 336–343 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-020-0940-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-020-0940-2

Keywords

Navigation