Skip to main content
Log in

Community Members’ Perceptions of the CSI Effect

  • Published:
American Journal of Criminal Justice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The CSI Effect is the notion that crime show viewing influences jurors to have unrealistic expectations of forensic evidence, which then affects their trial decisions. Analyses of popular media shows that the media portrays the effect as a real problem, and research surveying the legal community indicates that they believe the CSI Effect exists and may change their investigation and trial strategies accordingly. The present study expanded on this research by surveying community members regarding their perceptions of the CSI Effect. Community members reported their general television and crime show viewing behaviors, and we examined this in relation to their knowledge construction of the CSI Effect. Findings indicate that overall, the majority of community members did not have knowledge of the CSI effect, but those who did perceive it as an unrealistic expectation of evidence. When provided with a definition of the CSI Effect, people generally believed it exists. Additionally, crime show viewing and participant’s race influenced people’s perceptions of the CSI effect. Limitations of this study and directions for future research are also discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allison, P. D. (1999). Muliple regression: a Primer. CA: Sage.

  • Barak, G. (1994). Media, process, and the social construction of crime: studies in newsmaking criminology. London: Taylor & Francis

  • Bureau of Justice Statistics (2008). Crime and victims statistics. Retrieved on April 17th, 2008 from: http://www.ojp.gov/bjs/cvict.htm

  • Carlson, D. K. (2004, July). Racial profiling seen as pervasive, unjust. Gallup. Retrieved on April 2nd, 2011 from: http://www.gallup.com/poll/12406/Racial-Profiling-Seen-Pervasive-Unjust.aspx

  • Cohen, J., & Weimann, G. (2000). Cultivation revisited: some genres have some effects on some viewers. Communication Reports, 13(2), 99–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, S. A. & Dioso-Villa, R. (2007). CSI and its effects: media, juries, and the burden of proof. New England Law Review, 41(3), 435–469.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillman, D. A. (2007). Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method. Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillman, D. A., & Bowker, D. K. (2001). The web questionaire challenge to survey methodologists. Dimensions of Internet Science. Lengerich, Germany. www.pabstpublishers.com

  • Fleming, M. A., Wegener, D. T., & Petty, R. E. (1999). Procedural and legal motivations to correct for perceived judicial bias. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 186–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerbner, G., & Gross, L. (1976). Living with television: the violence profile. Journal of Communication, 26(2), 172–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerbner, G., Gross, L., Jackson-Beeck, M., Jeffries-Fox, S., & Signorielli, N. (1978). Cultural indicators: violence profile no. 9. Journal of Communication, 28(3), 176–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, R., & Pingree, S. (1980). Some processes in the cultivation effect. Communication Research, 7(193), 226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, R., & Pingree, S. (1981). Uniform content and habitual viewing: unnecessary assumptions in social reality effects. Human Communication Research, 7, 291–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes-Smith, R. M., & Levett, L. M. (2011). Jury’s still out: how television and crime show viewing influences jurors’ evaluations of evidence. Applied Psychology in Criminal Justice, 7, 29–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houck, M. M. (2006). CSI: reality. Scientific American, 295, 84–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaye, B. K., & Johnson, T. J. (1999). Taming the cyber frontier: techniques for improving online surveys. Social Science Computer Review, 17(3), 323–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovgren, S. (2004, September). “CSI Effect” Is mixed blessing for real crime labs. National Geographic News. Retrieved on March 2nd, 2008 from http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2004/09/0923_040923_csi.html

  • Maricopa County (2005). The CSI Effect and its Real-Life Impact on Justice: A Study by the Maricopa County Attorney’s Office (June 30, 2005). Retrieved on September 20, 2005 from http://www.maricopacountyattorney.org/Press/PDF/CSIReport.pdf

  • O’Neil, K. M., Penrod, S. D., & Bornstein, B. H. (2003). Web-based research: methodological variables’ effects on dropout and sample characteristics. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35(2), 217–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patry, M. W., Stinson, V., & Smith, S. M. (2008). The reality of the CSI effect. In J. Greenberg & C. Elliott (Eds.), Communications in question: Canadian perspectives on controversial issues in communication studies. Ontario: Thompson-Nelson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petty, R. E., & Wegener, D. T. (1993). Flexible correction processes in social judgment: correcting for context-induced contrast. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 29, 137–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podlas, K. (2006). “The CSI Effect”: exposing the media myth. Fordham Intellectual Property, Media & Entertainment Law Journal, 16(429), 465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potter, J. (1991). Examining cultivation from a psychological perspective: component sub-processes. Communication Research, 18, 77–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reardon, M. C., O’Neil, K. M., & Lawson, K. (2007). A new definition of the CSI Effect. Annual Meeting for the Association for Psychological Science

  • Robbers, M. (2008). Blinded by science: the social construction of reality in forensic television shows and its effect on criminal jury trials. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 19, 84–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shanahan, J., & Morgan, M. (1999). Television and its viewers: Cultivation theory and research. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shelton, D. E., Kim, Y. S., & Barak, G. (2006). A study of juror expectations and demands concerning scientific evidence: does the “CSI Effect” exist? Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment and Technology Law, 9, 331–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, S. M., Patry, M. W., & Stinson, V. (2007). But what is the CSI effect? how crime dramas influence people’s beliefs about forensic evidence. The Canadian Journal of Police & Security Services, 5, 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steadman, G. W. (2002). Survey of DNA crime laboratories, 2001 (NCJ 191191). Washington: Bureau of Justice Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, D. J. (2008). Forensic science, wrongful convictions, and American prosecutor discretion. The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 47(1), 31–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stinson, V., Patry, M. W., & Smith, S. M. (2007). The csi effect: reflections from police and forensic investigators. The Canadian Journal of Police and Security Services, 5(3), 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Surette, R. (2007). Media, crime and criminal justice: Images and realities (2nd ed.). Belmont: West Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Truman, J. L. (2011). Criminal Victimization, 2010 (NCJ 235508). Washington: Bureau of Justice Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. R. (2006). Viewing CSI and the threshold of guilt: managing truth and justice in reality and fiction. The Yale Law Journal, 115, 1050–1085.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uniform Crime Report. (2010). Expanded Homicide Data. Retrieved from: http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2010/crime-in-the-u.s.-2010/tables/10shrtbl03.xls

  • Watkins, M. (2004). Forensics in the media: Have attorneys reacted to the growing popularity of forensic crime dramas? Unpublished M.A., Florida State University, Tallahasse, FL

  • Weitzer, R. (1999). Citizens’ perceptions of police misconduct: race and neighborhood context. Justice Quarterly, 16, 819–846.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willing, R. (2004, August 5). ‘CSI effect’ has juries wanting more evidence. USA Today

  • York, O’Neil, Evans. (2006). The CSI effect: Presentation style, evidence quality and a possible remedy. Presented at the Annual meetings of the American Psychology and Law and Society Conference,

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Kristen Hamilton and Chelsey Thorp for their invaluable assistance on this project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rebecca M. Hayes.

Additional information

Portions of this research were presented at the 2009 meetings of the American Society of Criminology in Philadelphia, PA.

Appendix

Appendix

The forensic dramas were Body of Evidence, Bones, Cold Case, Criminal Minds, Crossing Jordan, CSI, CSI Miami, CSI New York, In Justice, NCIS, Numb3rs, and The Evidence. The forensic documentaries were Cold Case Files, Forensic Files, The First 48 Hours, The New Detectives, Trace Evidence, 48 Hours Mystery. The general crime documentaries were American Justice, America’s Most Wanted, COPS, The FBI Files, The Investigators, and The System. The general crime/courtroom dramas were Law & Order, Law & Order: Criminal Intent, Law & Order: SVU, Medium, Prison Break, and Without a Trace. The general news/crime news shows were Boston Legal, Conviction, 60 Minutes, Dateline, Catherine Crier, Nancy Grace and The Abrams Report

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hayes, R.M., Levett, L.M. Community Members’ Perceptions of the CSI Effect. Am J Crim Just 38, 216–235 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-012-9166-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-012-9166-2

Keywords

Navigation