Abstract
The CSI Effect is the notion that crime show viewing influences jurors to have unrealistic expectations of forensic evidence, which then affects their trial decisions. Analyses of popular media shows that the media portrays the effect as a real problem, and research surveying the legal community indicates that they believe the CSI Effect exists and may change their investigation and trial strategies accordingly. The present study expanded on this research by surveying community members regarding their perceptions of the CSI Effect. Community members reported their general television and crime show viewing behaviors, and we examined this in relation to their knowledge construction of the CSI Effect. Findings indicate that overall, the majority of community members did not have knowledge of the CSI effect, but those who did perceive it as an unrealistic expectation of evidence. When provided with a definition of the CSI Effect, people generally believed it exists. Additionally, crime show viewing and participant’s race influenced people’s perceptions of the CSI effect. Limitations of this study and directions for future research are also discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allison, P. D. (1999). Muliple regression: a Primer. CA: Sage.
Barak, G. (1994). Media, process, and the social construction of crime: studies in newsmaking criminology. London: Taylor & Francis
Bureau of Justice Statistics (2008). Crime and victims statistics. Retrieved on April 17th, 2008 from: http://www.ojp.gov/bjs/cvict.htm
Carlson, D. K. (2004, July). Racial profiling seen as pervasive, unjust. Gallup. Retrieved on April 2nd, 2011 from: http://www.gallup.com/poll/12406/Racial-Profiling-Seen-Pervasive-Unjust.aspx
Cohen, J., & Weimann, G. (2000). Cultivation revisited: some genres have some effects on some viewers. Communication Reports, 13(2), 99–114.
Cole, S. A. & Dioso-Villa, R. (2007). CSI and its effects: media, juries, and the burden of proof. New England Law Review, 41(3), 435–469.
Dillman, D. A. (2007). Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method. Hoboken: Wiley.
Dillman, D. A., & Bowker, D. K. (2001). The web questionaire challenge to survey methodologists. Dimensions of Internet Science. Lengerich, Germany. www.pabstpublishers.com
Fleming, M. A., Wegener, D. T., & Petty, R. E. (1999). Procedural and legal motivations to correct for perceived judicial bias. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 186–203.
Gerbner, G., & Gross, L. (1976). Living with television: the violence profile. Journal of Communication, 26(2), 172–194.
Gerbner, G., Gross, L., Jackson-Beeck, M., Jeffries-Fox, S., & Signorielli, N. (1978). Cultural indicators: violence profile no. 9. Journal of Communication, 28(3), 176–207.
Hawkins, R., & Pingree, S. (1980). Some processes in the cultivation effect. Communication Research, 7(193), 226.
Hawkins, R., & Pingree, S. (1981). Uniform content and habitual viewing: unnecessary assumptions in social reality effects. Human Communication Research, 7, 291–301.
Hayes-Smith, R. M., & Levett, L. M. (2011). Jury’s still out: how television and crime show viewing influences jurors’ evaluations of evidence. Applied Psychology in Criminal Justice, 7, 29–46.
Houck, M. M. (2006). CSI: reality. Scientific American, 295, 84–89.
Kaye, B. K., & Johnson, T. J. (1999). Taming the cyber frontier: techniques for improving online surveys. Social Science Computer Review, 17(3), 323–337.
Lovgren, S. (2004, September). “CSI Effect” Is mixed blessing for real crime labs. National Geographic News. Retrieved on March 2nd, 2008 from http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2004/09/0923_040923_csi.html
Maricopa County (2005). The CSI Effect and its Real-Life Impact on Justice: A Study by the Maricopa County Attorney’s Office (June 30, 2005). Retrieved on September 20, 2005 from http://www.maricopacountyattorney.org/Press/PDF/CSIReport.pdf
O’Neil, K. M., Penrod, S. D., & Bornstein, B. H. (2003). Web-based research: methodological variables’ effects on dropout and sample characteristics. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35(2), 217–226.
Patry, M. W., Stinson, V., & Smith, S. M. (2008). The reality of the CSI effect. In J. Greenberg & C. Elliott (Eds.), Communications in question: Canadian perspectives on controversial issues in communication studies. Ontario: Thompson-Nelson.
Petty, R. E., & Wegener, D. T. (1993). Flexible correction processes in social judgment: correcting for context-induced contrast. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 29, 137–165.
Podlas, K. (2006). “The CSI Effect”: exposing the media myth. Fordham Intellectual Property, Media & Entertainment Law Journal, 16(429), 465.
Potter, J. (1991). Examining cultivation from a psychological perspective: component sub-processes. Communication Research, 18, 77–102.
Reardon, M. C., O’Neil, K. M., & Lawson, K. (2007). A new definition of the CSI Effect. Annual Meeting for the Association for Psychological Science
Robbers, M. (2008). Blinded by science: the social construction of reality in forensic television shows and its effect on criminal jury trials. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 19, 84–102.
Shanahan, J., & Morgan, M. (1999). Television and its viewers: Cultivation theory and research. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
Shelton, D. E., Kim, Y. S., & Barak, G. (2006). A study of juror expectations and demands concerning scientific evidence: does the “CSI Effect” exist? Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment and Technology Law, 9, 331–368.
Smith, S. M., Patry, M. W., & Stinson, V. (2007). But what is the CSI effect? how crime dramas influence people’s beliefs about forensic evidence. The Canadian Journal of Police & Security Services, 5, 1–8.
Steadman, G. W. (2002). Survey of DNA crime laboratories, 2001 (NCJ 191191). Washington: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
Stevens, D. J. (2008). Forensic science, wrongful convictions, and American prosecutor discretion. The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 47(1), 31–51.
Stinson, V., Patry, M. W., & Smith, S. M. (2007). The csi effect: reflections from police and forensic investigators. The Canadian Journal of Police and Security Services, 5(3), 1–9.
Surette, R. (2007). Media, crime and criminal justice: Images and realities (2nd ed.). Belmont: West Wadsworth.
Truman, J. L. (2011). Criminal Victimization, 2010 (NCJ 235508). Washington: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
Tyler, T. R. (2006). Viewing CSI and the threshold of guilt: managing truth and justice in reality and fiction. The Yale Law Journal, 115, 1050–1085.
Uniform Crime Report. (2010). Expanded Homicide Data. Retrieved from: http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2010/crime-in-the-u.s.-2010/tables/10shrtbl03.xls
Watkins, M. (2004). Forensics in the media: Have attorneys reacted to the growing popularity of forensic crime dramas? Unpublished M.A., Florida State University, Tallahasse, FL
Weitzer, R. (1999). Citizens’ perceptions of police misconduct: race and neighborhood context. Justice Quarterly, 16, 819–846.
Willing, R. (2004, August 5). ‘CSI effect’ has juries wanting more evidence. USA Today
York, O’Neil, Evans. (2006). The CSI effect: Presentation style, evidence quality and a possible remedy. Presented at the Annual meetings of the American Psychology and Law and Society Conference,
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Kristen Hamilton and Chelsey Thorp for their invaluable assistance on this project.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Portions of this research were presented at the 2009 meetings of the American Society of Criminology in Philadelphia, PA.
Appendix
Appendix
The forensic dramas were Body of Evidence, Bones, Cold Case, Criminal Minds, Crossing Jordan, CSI, CSI Miami, CSI New York, In Justice, NCIS, Numb3rs, and The Evidence. The forensic documentaries were Cold Case Files, Forensic Files, The First 48 Hours, The New Detectives, Trace Evidence, 48 Hours Mystery. The general crime documentaries were American Justice, America’s Most Wanted, COPS, The FBI Files, The Investigators, and The System. The general crime/courtroom dramas were Law & Order, Law & Order: Criminal Intent, Law & Order: SVU, Medium, Prison Break, and Without a Trace. The general news/crime news shows were Boston Legal, Conviction, 60 Minutes, Dateline, Catherine Crier, Nancy Grace and The Abrams Report
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hayes, R.M., Levett, L.M. Community Members’ Perceptions of the CSI Effect. Am J Crim Just 38, 216–235 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-012-9166-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-012-9166-2