Abstract
Forestland tenure institutions and patterns are in a period of rapid change in the USA. Historically dominant forestland tenures are disappearing, and new tenures are emerging. Traditional, vertically integrated forest products firms have shed their forestland holdings which have been picked up by Timber Investment Management Organizations (TIMOs) and Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs). Increasing numbers of private individuals and families are purchasing small rural tracts and some communities are developing innovative means to gain control over nearby forestlands in order to protect these lands from commercial real estate development. Within this context of rapid ownership change, small-scale forest owners including families and communities find themselves at a competitive disadvantage, relative to large corporate owners, in wood commodity markets. This paper considers how small-scale forest tenures, relative to large corporate tenures, may be advantageous to society with regard to selected ecological, social, and economic factors. While the paper primarily draws upon illustrations from the US Pacific Northwest, its themes are global in nature.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Birch T (1996) Private forestland owners of the Western United States, 1994, USDA Forest Service NE Forest Experiment Station Resource Bulletin NE–137. Radnor, PA
Bliss JC (1992) Evidence of ethnicity: management styles of forest owners in Wisconsin. J For Conserv Hist 36(2):63–72
Bliss JC (2000) Public perceptions of clearcutting. J For 98(12):4–9
Bliss JC, Martin AJ (1989) Identifying NIPF management motivations with qualitative methods. For Sci 35(2):601–622
Bliss JC, Nepal SK, Brooks RT Jr, Larsen MD (1994) Forestry community or granfalloon? J For 92(9):6–10
Bliss JC, Nepal SK, Brooks RT Jr, Larsen MD (1997) In the mainstream: environmental attitudes of mid-south NIPF owners. South J Appl For 21(1):37–42
Braxton Little J (2006) Timberlands in turmoil. Am For Winter, 2006
Butler BJ, Leatherberry EC (2004) America’s family forest owners. J For 102(7):4–9
Campbell Group (2006) Timber trends Newsletter, December 2006. Available Online at: http://www.campbellgroup.com/timber_research/
Egan AF, Luloff AE (2000) The exurbanization of America’s forests: research in rural social science. J For 98(3):26–30
Fedkiw J (1983) Background paper on non-industrial private forest lands, their management, and related public and private assistance. USDA Forest Service Office of Budget Program Analysis, Office of the Secretary, WA
Fisher AP, Bliss JC (2006) Mental and biophysical terrains of biodiversity: Conservation of oak woodland on family forests. Soc Nat Resour 19(7):625–645
Hayes P (2007) Hyla Woods News. Electronic Newsletter, March, 2007. Oregon, Portland
Jamison M (2007) Timber in transition: booming values shift Plum Creek from logging to real estate. The Missoulian Newspaper, Available Online at: http://www.missoulian.com
MacCleery DW (1993) American forests: a history of resiliency and recovery. USDA Forest Service FS-540
McMahon R (1964) Private nonindustrial ownership of forest land. Yale University School of Forestry Bulletin No. 68. Yale University, New Haven
Sampson N, DeCoster L (2000) Forest fragmentation: implications for sustainable private forests. J For 98(3):4–8
Smith WB, Miles PD, Vissage JS, Pugh SA (2004) Forest resources of the United States, 2002, General Technical Report NC-241. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Research Station, St. Paul
Stanfield BJ, Bliss JC, Spies TA (2003) Landownership and landscape structure: a spatial analysis of 66 Oregon Coast Range watersheds. Landsc Ecol (in press)
U.S. Census Bureau (2000) United States Census 2000. http://www.census.gov
Wilent S (2004) Investors increase timberland holdings: eight percent of “investable” US forestland held by investment managers. The Forestry Source December 2004
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bliss, J.C., Kelly, E.C. Comparative Advantages of Small-Scale Forestry Among Emerging Forest Tenures. Small-scale Forestry 7, 95–104 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-008-9043-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-008-9043-5