Skip to main content
Log in

Synthesis of accelerograms compatible with the Chinese GB 50011-2001 design spectrum via harmonic wavelets: artificial and historic records

  • Published:
Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A versatile approach is employed to generate artificial accelerograms which satisfy the compatibility criteria prescribed by the Chinese aseismic code provisions GB 50011-2001. In particular, a frequency dependent peak factor derived by means of appropriate Monte Carlo analyses is introduced to relate the GB 50011-2001 design spectrum to a parametrically defined evolutionary power spectrum (EPS). Special attention is given to the definition of the frequency content of the EPS in order to accommodate the mathematical form of the aforementioned design spectrum. Further, a one-to-one relationship is established between the parameter controlling the time-varying intensity of the EPS and the effective strong ground motion duration. Subsequently, an efficient auto-regressive moving-average (ARMA) filtering technique is utilized to generate ensembles of non-stationary artificial accelerograms whose average response spectrum is in a close agreement with the considered design spectrum. Furthermore, a harmonic wavelet based iterative scheme is adopted to modify these artificial signals so that a close matching of the signals’ response spectra with the GB 50011-2001 design spectrum is achieved on an individual basis. This is also done for field recorded accelerograms pertaining to the May, 2008 Wenchuan seismic event. In the process, zero-phase high-pass filtering is performed to accomplish proper baseline correction of the acquired spectrum compatible artificial and field accelerograms. Numerical results are given in a tabulated format to expedite their use in practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bogdanoff JL, Goldberg JE and Bernard MC (1961), “Response of a Simple Structure to a Random Earthquake-type Disturbance,” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 51(2): 293–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bommer JJ and Martínez-Pereira A (1999), “The Effective Duration of Earthquake Strong Motion,” Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 3(2): 127–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bommer JJ and Ruggeri C (2002), “The Specification of Acceleration Time-histories in Seismic Design Codes,” European Earthquake Engineering, 16(1): 3–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boore DM (2003), “Simulation of Ground Motion Using the Stochastic Method,” Pure and Applied Geophysics, 160(3–4): 635–676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boore DM (2005), “On Pads and Filters: Processing Strong-motion Data,” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 95(2): 745–750.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boore DM and Akkar S (2003), “Effect of Causal and Acausal Filters on Elastic and Inelastic Response Spectra,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 32(11): 1729–1748.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boore DM and Bommer JJ (2005), “Processing of Strong-motion Accelerograms: Needs, Options and Consequences,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 25(2): 93–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carballo JE and Cornell CA (2000), “Probabilistic Seismic Demand Analysis: Spectrum Matching and Design,” Report RMS-41, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University.

  • CEN (2004), Eurocode 8: Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance — Part 1: General Rules, Seismic Actions and Rules for Buildings (EN 1998-1: 2004), Comité Européen de Normalisation, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chopra AK (2007), “Elastic Response Spectrum: A Historical Note,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 36(1): 3–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chopra AK and Lopez OA (1979), “Evaluation of Simulated Ground Motions for Predicting Elastic Response of Long Period Structures and Inelastic Response of Structures,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 7(4): 383–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clough RW and Penzien J (1993), Dynamics of Structures. 2nd ed, New York: Mc-Graw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conte JP, Pister KS and Mahin SA (1992), “Nonstationary ARMA Modeling of Seismic Motions,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 11(7): 411–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Converse AM and Brady AG (1992), “BAP: Basic Strong-motion Accelerogram Processing Software, Version 1.0,” Open File Report 92-296A, United States Department of the interior Geological Survey.

  • Crespi PG, Floris C and Paganini P (2002), “A Probabilistic Method for Generating Spectrum Compatible Earthquake Time Histories,” European Earthquake Engineering, 16(3): 3–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Das S and Gupta VK (2008), “Wavelet-based Simulation of Spectrum-compatible Aftershock Accelerograms,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 37(11): 1333–1348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faccioli E, Paolucci R and Rey J (2004), “Displacement Spectra for Long Periods,” Earthquake Spectra, 20(2): 347–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falsone G and Neri F (2000), “Stochastic Modeling of Earthquake Excitation Following the EC8: Power Spectrum and Filtering Equations,” European Earthquake Engineering, 14(1): 3–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • GB 50011-2001 (2001), Code for Seismic Design of Buildings, National Standard of the People’s Republic of China, Beijing: China Building Industry Press. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Giaralis A and Spanos PD (2009), “Wavelet-based Response Spectrum Compatible Synthesis of Accelerograms-Eurocode Application (EC8),” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 29(1): 219–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta ID and Joshi RG (1993), “On Synthesizing Response Spectrum Compatible Accelerograms,” European Earthquake Engineering, 7(2): 25–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hancock J and Bommer JJ (2006), “A State-of-Knowledge Review of the Influence of Strong-motion Duration on Structural Damage,” Earthquake Spectra, 22(3): 827–845.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hancock J, Watson-Lamprey J, Abrahamson NA, Bommer JJ, Markatis A, McCoy E and Mendis R (2006), “An Improved Method of Matching Response Spectra of Recorded Earthquake Ground Motion Using Wavelets,” Journal of Earthquake Engineering 101): 67–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ICC (2006), International Building Code, International Code Council, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iervolino I, Manfredi G and Cosenza E (2006), “Ground Motion Duration Effects on Nonlinear Seismic Response,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 35(1): 21–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iyama J and Kuwamura H (1999), “Application of Wavelets to Analysis and Simulation of Earthquake Motions,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 28(3): 255–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jangid RS (2004), “Response of SDOF System to Non-stationary Earthquake Excitation,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 33(15): 1417–1428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanai K (1957), “Semi-empirical Formula for the Seismic Characteristics of the Ground,” Bulletin of Earthquake Research Institute, University of Tokyo, 35: 309–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karabalis DL, Cokkinides GJ, Rizos DC and Mulliken JS (2000), “Simulation of Earthquake Ground Motions by a Deterministic Approach,” Advances in Engineering Software, 31(5): 329–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kottke A and Rathje E (2008), “A Semi-automated Procedure for Selecting and Scaling Recorded Earthquake Motions for Dynamic Analysis,” Earthquake Spectra, 24(4): 911–932.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kozin F (1989), “Autoregressive Moving Average Models of Earthquake Records,” Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 3(2): 58–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lai SP (1982), “Statistical Characterization of Strong Ground Motions Using Power Spectral Density Function,” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 72(1): 259–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lam N, Wilson J and Hutchinson G (2000), “Generation of Synthetic Earthquake Accelerograms Using Seismological Modeling: A Review,” Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 4(3): 321–354v.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin C-CJ and Ghaboussi J (2001), “Generating Multiple Spectrum Compatible Accelerograms Using Stochastic Neural Networks,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 30(7): 1021–1042.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lutes LD and Lilhanand (1979), “Frequency Content in Earthquake Simulation,” Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division, ASCE, 105(EM1): 143–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marano GC, Trentadue F, Morrone E and Amara L (2008), “Sensitivity Analysis of Optimum Stochastic Nonstationary Response Spectra under Uncertain Soil Parameters,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 28(12): 1078–1093.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason AB and Iwan WD (1983), “An Approach to the First Passage Problem in Random Vibration,” Journal of Applied Mechanics, ASME, 50(3): 641–646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michaelov G, Lutes LD and Sarkani S (2001), “Extreme Value of Response to Nonstationary Excitation,” Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 127(4): 352–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morikawa H and Zerva A (2008), “Approximate Representation of the Statistics for Extreme Responses of Single Degree-of-freedom System Excited by Non-stationary Processes,” Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 23(3): 279–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mukherjee S and Gupta VK (2002), “Wavelet-based Generation of Spectrum-compatible Time-histories,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 22(9–12): 799–804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naeim F, Alimoradi A and Pezeshk S (2004), “Selection and Scaling of Ground Motion Time Histories for Structural Design Using Genetic Algorithms,” Earthquake Spectra, 20(2): 413–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newland DE (1994), “Harmonic and Musical Wavelets,” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, 444(1921): 605–620.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newland DE (1998), “Time-frequency and Time-scale Signal Analysis by Harmonic Wavelets,” Procházka A, Uhlír J, Rayner PJW and Kingsbury NG, Signal analysis and prediction, Chapter 1, Boston: Birkhaüser.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nocedal J and Wright SJ (1999), Numerical Optimization, New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ólafsson S, Remseth S and Sigbjornsson R (2001), “Stochastic Models for Simulation of Strong Ground Motion in Iceland,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 30(9): 1305–1331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Politis NP, Giaralis A and Spanos PD (2007), “Joint Time-frequency Representation of Simulated Earthquake Accelerograms via the Adaptive Chirplet Transform,” Deodatis G and Spanos PD, Computational Stochastic Mechanics-5, Rotterdam: Millpress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preumont A (1984), “The Generation of Spectrum Compatible Accelerograms for the Design of Nuclear Power Plants,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 12(4): 481–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Priestley MB (1965), “Evolutionary Spectra and Non-Stationary Processes,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B, 27(2): 204–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quek S-T, Teo Y-P and Balendra T (1990), “Nonstationary Structural Response with Evolutionary Spectra Using Seismological Input Model,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 19(2): 275–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts JB and Spanos PD (2003), Random Vibration and Statistical Linearization, New York: Dover Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu Shiping (1993), “Seismic Design of Buildings in China,” Earthquake Spectra, 9(4): 703–737.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shrikhande M and Gupta VK (1996), “On Generating Ensemble of Design Spectrum-compatible Accelerograms,” European Earthquake Engineering, 10(3): 49–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spanos PD (1983), “Digital Synthesis of Response-Design Spectrum Compatible Earthquake Records for Dynamic Analyses,” The Shock and Vibration Digest, 15(3): 21–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spanos PD, Giaralis A, Politis NP and Roesset JM (2007), “Numerical Treatment of Seismic Accelerograms and of Inelastic Seismic Structural Responses Using Harmonic Wavelets,” Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 22(4): 254–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spanos PD and Lutes LD (1980), “Probability of Response to Evolutionary Process,” Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division, ASCE, 106(EM2): 213–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spanos PD, Tezcan J and Tratskas P (2005), “Stochastic Processes Evolutionary Spectrum Estimation via Harmonic Wavelets,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 194(12–16): 1367–1383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spanos PD and Vargas Loli LM (1985), “A Statistical Approach to Generation of Design Spectrum Compatible Earthquake Time Histories,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 4(1): 2–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spanos PD and Zeldin BA (1998), “Monte Carlo Treatment of Random Fields: A Broad Perspective,” Applied Mechanics Reviews, 51(3): 219–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suárez LE and Montejo LA (2005), “Generation of Artificial Earthquakes via the Wavelet Transform,” International Journal of Solids and Structures, 42(21–22): 5905–5919.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suárez LE and Montejo LA (2007), “Application of the Wavelet Transform in the Generation and Analysis of Spectrum-compatible Records,” Structural Engineering and Mechanics, 27(2): 173–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trifunac MD and Brady AG (1975), “A Study on the Duration of Strong Earthquake Ground Motion,” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 65(3): 581–626.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanmarcke EH (1976), “Structural Response to Earthquakes,” Lomnitz C and Rosenblueth E, Seismic Risk and Engineering Decisions, Chapter 8, Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Yayong (2004), “Comaprison of Seismic Actions and Structural Design Requirements in Chinese Code GB 50011 and International Standard ISO 3010,” Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibrations 3(1): 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Junjie, Fan Lichu, Qian Shie and Zhou Jing (2002), “Simulations of Non-stationary Frequency Content and Its Importance to Seismic Assessment of Structures,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 31(4): 993–1005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wen YK and Gu Ping (2004), “Description and Simulation of Nonstationary Processes Based on Hilbert Spectra,” Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE, 130(8): 942–951.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. D. Spanos.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Spanos, P.D., Giaralis, A. & Li, J. Synthesis of accelerograms compatible with the Chinese GB 50011-2001 design spectrum via harmonic wavelets: artificial and historic records. Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib. 8, 189–206 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-009-9017-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-009-9017-4

Keywords

Navigation