Skip to main content
Log in

Sliding response of gravity dams including vertical seismic accelerations

  • Published:
Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Seismic safety assessment of gravity dams has become a major concern in many regions of the world while the effects of vertical seismic accelerations on the response of structures remain poorly understood. This paper first investigates the effect of including vertical accelerations in the sliding response analysis of gravity dams subjected to a range of historical ground motion records separated in two groups according to their source-to-site distance. Analyses showed that the incidence of vertical accelerations on the sliding response of gravity dams is significantly higher for near-source records than for far-source records. The pseudo-static 30% load combination rule, commonly used in practice to account for the non-simultaneous occurrence of the peak horizontal and vertical accelerations, yielded good approximations of the minimum safety factors against sliding computed from time-history analyses. A method for empirically estimating the vertical response spectra based on horizontal spectra, accounting for the difference in frequency content and amplitudes between the two components is investigated. Results from analyses using spectrum compatible horizontal and vertical synthetic records also approximated well the sliding response of a gravity dam subjected to series of simultaneous horizontal and vertical historical earthquake records.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arias A (1969), “A Measure of Earthquake Intensity in Seismic Design for Nuclear Power Plants,” Ed. By R. Hansen, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolt BA (1973) “Duration of strong ground motion,” Proceedings of the Fifth World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Rome, Italy, 1, 6-D, Paper No. 292.

  • Bozorgnia Y, Niazi M and Campbell KW (1995), “Characteristics of Free-field Vertical Ground Motion During the Northridge Earthquake,” Earthquake Spectra, 11 (4): 515–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bozorgnia Y, Niazi M and Campbell KW (1996), “Relationship Between Vertical and Horizontal Response Spectra for the Northridge Earthquake,” Eleventh World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Mexico, Paper No. 893.

  • Canadian Dam Association — CDA (1997), Dam Safety Guidelines, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

  • Chavez JW and Fenves GL (1993), “Earthquake Analysis and Response of Concrete Gravity Dams Including Base Sliding,” Report No. UCB/EERC-93/07, Earthquake Engineering Research Centre, University of California, Berkeley, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen B-F (1996), “Nonlinear Hydrodynamic Effects on Concrete Dams,” Engineering Structures, 18 (3): 201–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chopra AK and Zhang L (1991), “Earthquake-induced Base Sliding of Concrete Gravity Dams,” ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering, 117 (12): 3698–3719.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christopoulos C (1998), “A Study on the Characteristics of Vertical Seismic Accelerations and Their Effects on Civil Engineering Structures,” École Polytechnique de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier CJ and Elnashai AS (2001), “A Procedure for Combining Vertical and Horizontal Seismic Action Effects,” Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 5 (4): 521–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elnashai AS and Papazoglou AJ (1997), “Procedure and Spectra for Analysis of RC Structures Subjected to Strong Vertical Earthquake Loads,” Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 1 (1): 121–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (1997, 2002), Engineering Guidelines for the Evaluation of Hydro Power Projects, Chapter X, Other Dams, Washington, D.C., U.S.A.

  • Fenves G and Chopra AK (1984), “Earthquake Analysis Response of Concrete Gravity Dams,” Report No. UCB/EERC-84/10, Earthquake Engineering Research Centre, University of California, Berkeley, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gasparini DA and Vanmarcke EH (1976), “SIMQKE: A Program for Artificial Motion Generation,” Dept. of Civil Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

  • Ghrib F, Léger P, Tinawi R, Lupien R and Veilleux M (1997), “Seismic Safety Evaluation of Gravity Dams,” The International Journal on Hydropower and Dams, 4 (2): 126–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidebrecht AC, Tso WK and Zhu TJ (1992), “Engineering Implication of Ground Motion A/V Ratio,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, ():133–144.

  • International Commission On Large Dams (2001), “Design Features of Dams to Resist Seismic Ground Motion,” Bulletin 120, Paris, France.

  • Lawson J (1994), “Reflections on the Effect of Vertical Seismic Acceleration,” PCI Journal, 39 (4): 40–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Léger P and Leclerc M (1996), “Evaluation of Earthquake Ground Motions to Predict Cracking Response of Gravity Dams,” Engineering Structures, 18 (3): 227–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lermo J and Chavez-Garcia F (1993), “Site Effect Evaluation Using Spectral Ratios with One Station,” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 83: 1574–1594.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCann MW and Shaw HC (1979), “Determining Strong-Motion Duration of Earthquakes,” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 69 (4): 1253–1265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell D, Tinawi R and Law T (1990), “Damage Caused by the November 25, 1988 Saguenay Earthquake,” Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 17 (3): 338–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nath B (1969), “Hydrodynamic Pressures on High Dams Due to Vertical Earthquake Motions,” Proceedings of The Institution of Civil Engineers, 42: 413–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • NRCC (1995), National Building Code of Canada, Associate Committee on the National Building Code, National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura Y (1989), “A Method for Dynamic Characteristics Estimation of Subsurface Using Micro Tremor on Ground Surface,” QT RTRI, 30: 25–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohno S, Konno T, Abe K, Masao T, Iizuka S, and Uebayashi H (1996), “Ground Motions for Aseismic Design,” Eleventh World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Mexico, Paper No. 1791.

  • Paz M (1994), International Handbook of Earthquake Engineering. Codes, Programs and Examples. Chapman & Hall, U.S.A.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinawi R, Léger P, Leclerc M and Cipolla G (1998), “Shake Table Tests for the Seismic Response of Concrete Gravity Dams,” 11th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Paris, France, pp. 11–22.

  • Trifunac MD and Brady AG (1975), “A Study on the Duration of Strong Earthquake Ground Motion,” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 65 (3): 581–626.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S Army Corps of Engineers (1995), “Gravity Dam Design,” Engineering Manual, EM 1110-2-2200, Washington D.C., U.S.A.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Constantin Christopoulos.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Christopoulos, C., Léger, P. & Filiatrault, A. Sliding response of gravity dams including vertical seismic accelerations. Earthq. Engin. Engin. Vib. 2, 189–200 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-003-0003-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-003-0003-y

Keywords

Navigation