Skip to main content
Log in

Estimation of distribution algorithm enhanced particle swarm optimization for water distribution network optimization

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The optimization of a water distribution network (WDN) is a highly nonlinear, multi-modal, and constrained combinatorial problem. Particle swarm optimization (PSO) has been shown to be a fast converging algorithm for WDN optimization. An improved estimation of distribution algorithm (EDA) using historic best positions to construct a sample space is hybridized with PSO both in sequential and in parallel to improve population diversity control and avoid premature convergence. Two water distribution network benchmark examples from the literature are adopted to evaluate the performance of the proposed hybrid algorithms. The experimental results indicate that the proposed algorithms achieved the literature record minimum (6.081 M$) for the small size Hanoi network. For the large size Balerma network, the parallel hybrid achieved a slightly lower minimum (1.921M€) than the current literature reported best minimum (1.923M€). The average number of evaluations needed to achieve the minimum is one order smaller than most existing algorithms. With a fixed, small number of evaluations, the sequential hybrid outperforms the parallel hybrid showing its capability for fast convergence. The fitness and diversity of the populations were tracked for the proposed algorithms. The track record suggests that constructing an EDA sample space with historic best positions can improve diversity control significantly. Parallel hybridization also helps to improve diversity control yet its effect is relatively less significant.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Walski T M. State-of-the-art: pipe network optimization. In: Toeno H C, ed. Computer Applications in Water Resources, ASCE, New York, 1985, 559–568

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fujiwara O, Jenchaimahakoon B, Edirishinghe N C P. A modified linear programming gradient method for optimal design of looped water distribution networks. Water Resources Research, 1987, 23(6): 977–982

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kessler A, Shamir U. Analysis of the linear programming gradient method for optimal design of water supply networks. Water Resources Research, 1989, 25(7): 1469–1480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Walters G A, Cembrowicz R G. Optimal design of water distribution networks. In: Cabrera E and Martinez F, eds.Water Supply Systems, State-of-the-Art And Future Trends. Computational Mechanics Inc., 1993, 91–117

    Google Scholar 

  5. Simpson A R, Dandy G C, Murphy L J. Genetic algorithms compared to other techniques for pipe optimization. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 1994, 120(4): 423–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Vairavamoorthy K, Ali M. Optimal design of water distribution systems using genetic algorithms. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 2000, 15(5): 374–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kadu M S, Gupta R, Bhave P R. Optimal design of water networks using a modified genetic algorithm with reduction in search space. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 2008, 134(2): 147–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Montalvo I, Izquierdo J, Pérez R, Tung M M. Particle swarm optimization applied to the design of water supply systems. Computers & Mathematics with Applications (Oxford, England), 2008, 56(3): 769–776

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Qi X. Water Distribution Network Optimization: A Hybrid Approach. Dissertation for the Master Degree. Athens, Georgia: University of Georgia, 2013

    Google Scholar 

  10. Eberhart R C, Shi Y. Comparison Between Genetic Algorithms and Particle Swarm Optimization, Evolutionary Programming VII, Lecture Notes in Computer Science: Springer, 1998, 611–616

    Google Scholar 

  11. Chen M R, Li X, Zhang X, Lu Y Z. A novel particle swarm optimizer hybridized with extremal optimization. Applied Soft Computing, 2010, 10(2): 367–373

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Qi X, Rasheed K, Li K, Potter D. A Fast Parameter Setting Strategy for Particle Swarm Optimization and Its Application in Urban Water Distribution Network Optimal Design, The 2013 International Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Methods (GEM), 2013

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kennedy J, Mendes R. Population structure and particle swarm performance. IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, 2002, 1671–1676

    Google Scholar 

  14. Li X. Niching without niching parameters: particle swarm optimization using a ring topology. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 2010, 14(1): 150–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kennedy J. Small worlds and mega-minds: effects of neighborhood topology on particle swarm performance. Proceedings of the 1999 Conference on Evolutionary Computation, 1999, 1931–1938

    Google Scholar 

  16. Krink T, Vesterstrom J, Riget J. Particle swarm optimization with spatial particle extension. Proceedings of the Congress on Evolutionary Computation, 2002

    Google Scholar 

  17. Monson C K, Seppi K D. Adaptive diversity in PSO. In: Proceedings of the 8th Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation (GECCO’06), ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2006, 59–66

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Angeline P. Evolutionary optimization versus particle swarm optimization: philosophy and performance differences. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Evolutionary Computation 1998, 1998, 601–610

    Google Scholar 

  19. Zhou Y, Jin J. EDA-PSO-A new hybrid intelligent optimization algorithm. In: Proceedings of the Michigan University Graduate Student Symposium, 2006

    Google Scholar 

  20. Iqbal M, Montes de Oca M A. An estimation of distribution particle swarm optimization algorithm. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Ant Colony Optimization and Swarm Intelligence, 2006

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kulkarni RV, Venayagamoorthy G K. An estimation of distribution improved particle swarm optimization algorithm. In: 3rd International Conference on Intelligent Sensors, Sensor Networks and Information, 2007, 539–544

    Google Scholar 

  22. El-Abd M, Kamel MS. Particle swarm optimization with varying bounds. In: Proceedings of IEEE congress on Evolutionary Computation. 2007, 4757–4761

    Google Scholar 

  23. El-Abd M. Preventing premature convergence in a PSO and EDA hybrid. In: Proceedings IEEE congress on Evolutionary Computation. 2009, 3060–3066

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ahn C W, An J, Yoo J C. Estimation of particle swarm distribution algorithms: combining the benefits of PSO and EDAs. Information Sciences, 2012, 192: 109–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. EPANET 2.0, 2002. http://www.epa.gov/nrmrl/wswrd/epanet.html

  26. Fujiwara O, Khang D B. A two-phase decomposition method for optimal design of looped water distribution networks. Water Resources Research, 1991, 27(5): 985–986

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Reca J, Martinez J, Gil C, Baños R. Application of several metaheuristic techniques to the optimization of real looped water distribution networks. Water Resources Management, 2008, 22(10): 1367–1379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Reca J, Martínez J. Genetic algorithms for the design of looped irrigation water distribution networks. Water Resources Research, 2006, 42(5): W05416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Zecchin A C, Simpson A R, Maier H R, Leonard M, Roberts A J, Berrisford M J. Application of two ant colony optimisation algorithms to water distribution system optimisation. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 2006, 44(5–6): 451–468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Geem Z W. Optimal cost design of water distribution networks using harmony search. Engineering Optimization, 2006, 38(3): 259–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Geem Z W. Particle-swarm harmony search for water networks design. Engineering Optimization, 2009, 41(4): 297–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Bolognesi A, Bragalli C, Marchi A, Artina S. Genetic Heritage Evolution by Stochastic Transmission in the optimal design of water distribution networks. Advances in Engineering Software, 2010, 41(5): 792–801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Tolson B A, Asadzadeh M, Maier H R, Zecchin A C. Hybrid discrete dynamically dimensioned search (HD-DDS) algorithm for water distribution system design optimization. Water Resources Research, 2009, 45(12): W12416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Zheng F F, Simpson A R, Zecchin A C. A combined NLP-differential evolution algorithm approach for the optimization of looped water distribution systems.Water Resources Research, 2011, 47(8): W08531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Baños R, Gil C, Reca J, Montoya G G. A memetic algorithm applied to the design of water distribution networks. Applied Soft Computing, 2010, 10(1): 261–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ke Li.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Qi, X., Li, K. & Potter, W.D. Estimation of distribution algorithm enhanced particle swarm optimization for water distribution network optimization. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. 10, 341–351 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-015-0776-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-015-0776-z

Keywords

Navigation