Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of a commercial electronic nose system coupled with universal gas sensing chamber for sensing indicator compounds associated with meat safety

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Food Measurement and Characterization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study was conducted to evaluate the performance of a commercial electronic nose (Cyranose 320™) for sensing indicator compounds (ethanol and acetic acid) associated with spoiled beef. The present study reported the sensitivity of an array of 32 sensors to ethanol and acetic acid. Different vapor concentrations of ethanol (37, 100, 250 and 500 ppm) and acetic acid (38, 75, 100, 200 and 300 ppm) were tested to evaluate the performance of the commercial system. An in-house designed universal gas sensing and characterization system was coupled with the electronic nose system to generate the desired gas concentration. The raw smell print patterns were obtained and analyzed for individual and multiple detectors. Tukey’s multiple comparison technique was performed to analyze the response of individual detectors. Area above and below the baseline were selected as two features for pair wise comparison of the detectors. Different sensors showed different responses between various concentrations of gases. Analysis of multiple detectors was performed using linear and quadratic discriminant analysis (LDA and QDA) along with bootstrap. LDA along with bootstrap provided the highest total classification accuracies of 94.34 % between 100 and 200 ppm of acetic acid. QDA provided higher total classification accuracy of 89.69 % at lower concentration level of 38 and 75 ppm for acetic acid and 84.78 % between 37 and 100 ppm of ethanol. Hence, QDA was a better model of choice at lower concentrations. This study proved non-selective nature of sensors and showed that simultaneous use of multiple sensor information provided better classification accuracy for discriminating various gas concentrations as compared to using individual sensor output.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Z. Zhang, J. Tong, D. Chen, Y. Lan, J. Bionic Eng. 5, 67–73 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. S. Fuchs, P. Strobel, M. Siadat, M. Lumbreras, Mater. Sci. Eng C 28, 949–953 (2008)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. U. Siripatrawan, Sens Actuators B 133, 414–419 (2008)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. D.L.A. Fernandes, M.T.S.R. Gomes, Talanta 77, 77–83 (2008)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. S. Dragonieri, J.T. Annema, R. Schot, M.P.C. van der Schee, A. Spanevello, P. Carratú, O. Resta, K.F. Rabe, P.J. Sterk, Lung Cancer 64, 166–170 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. M.A. Markom, A.Y.M. Shakaff, A.H. Adom, M.N. Ahmad, W. Hidayat, A.H. Abdullah, N.A. Fikri, Comput. Electron. Agric. 66, 140–146 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. C. Li, P.H. Heinemann, P.M. Reed, Trans ASABE 51, 321–330 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. S. Balasubramanian, S. Panigrahi, C.M. Logue, M. Marchello, C. Doetkott, H. Gu, J. Sherwood, L. Nolan, Trans Am Soc Agric Eng 47, 1625–1634 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. S. Balasubramanian, S. Panigrahi, C.M. Logue, H. Gu, M. Marchello, J. Food Eng. 91, 91–98 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. B. Siegmund, W. Pfannhauser, Zeitschrift Für Lebensmitteluntersuchung Und -Forschung A 208, 336–341 (1999)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. P. Bhattacharjee, C.M. Logue, C. Doetkott, J. Sherwood, M. Marchello, and S. Panigrahi, in (Chicago, IL, 2007)

  12. T. Nakamoto, M. Yosihioka, Y. Tanaka, K. Kobayashi, T. Moriizumi, S. Ueyama, W.S. Yerazunis, Sens Actuators B 116, 202–206 (2006)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. S. Panigrahi, Y. Chang, L. Khot, An Universal Gas Sensing and Characterization System for Evaluating Electronic Nose System (North Dakota State University, Fargo, 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  14. N.A. Olleveant, G. Humphris, B. Roe, J. Clin. Nurs. 8, 299–304 (1999)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. SAS ® 9.1.3 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA)

  16. R. Wehrens, W.E. van der Linden, J. Chemom. 11, 157–171 (1997)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. B. Efron, R. Tibshirani, Cross-validation and the bootstrap: estimating the error rate of a prediction rule (Technical Report No. 47, Dept. of Statistics, Stanford University, California, 1995)

    Google Scholar 

  18. S. Panigrahi, C. Doetkott, and R. Marsh, in Proc. Sensoral 98: International Workshop on Sensing Quality of Agricultural Products (1998), pp. 16–20

  19. B. Efron, J. Am. Stat. Assoc.   78, 316–331 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. B. Efron, R. Tibshirani, An Introduction to the Bootstrap (Chapman & Hall/CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1993)

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Our sincere appreciation to the USDA Cooperative State research, Education and Extension service (USDA-CSREES) for their financial support for this research. Our sincere thanks to Dr. Don Qing Lin, Mr. Sritej Perubhotla, Curt Doetkott, and John Reber for their contribution in programming and statistical analysis. Note: Mention of any commercial product, company name or trade mark in this paper does not constitute any recommendation, or endorsement by the authors and/or their affiliated organizations/enitities. Mention of any commercial product, company name or trade mark in this paper does not constitute any exclusion of  similar companies and/or their products by the authors and their affiliated organizations/entities.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Suranjan Panigrahi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mohapatra, P., Panigrahi, S. & Amamcharla, J. Evaluation of a commercial electronic nose system coupled with universal gas sensing chamber for sensing indicator compounds associated with meat safety. Food Measure 9, 121–129 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11694-014-9200-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11694-014-9200-9

Keywords

Navigation