Abstract
Social stress has a major detrimental impact on subjective well-being. Previous research mainly focused on two methods to induce and measure social stress: social exclusion and performance evaluation. For social exclusion researchers frequently focused on the Cyberball task, which in contrast to many psychosocial stress paradigms does not include a performance component. The aim of the current study was to establish an optimized psychosocial stress paradigm by combining both, social exclusion as well as performance evaluation within a single fMRI paradigm. We implemented a modification of the Cyberball task including a performance game (with exclusion and inclusion periods) in addition to the already established exclusion and inclusion periods. This indeed resulted in increased subjective stress in the performance game. Hence, the modified Cyberball version seems to be superior in mapping relevant neural social stress correlates more pronounced and reliably. Exclusion within the performance-related context contrasted to the unmodified exclusion was associated with higher activation in the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex and the anterior insula. Moreover, the modified exclusion reflected greater social processing in the precuneus, several temporo-parietal and medial prefrontal areas, as suggested by the additional task aspects of social evaluation and social perspective taking. The findings emphasize that public negative evaluation is effective in substantially enlarging and potentiating the distressing effect of exclusion on a subjective as well as on a neural level. This may have a great potential for further experimental research on social stress.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bass, E. C., Stednitz, S. J., Simonson, K., Shen, T., & Gahtan, E. (2014). Physiological stress reactivity and empathy following social exclusion: a test of the defensive emotional analgesia hypothesis. Social Neuroscience, 9(5), 504–513. doi:10.1080/17470919.2014.929533.
Bastian, B., & Haslam, N. (2010). Excluded from humanity: the dehumanizing effects of social ostracism. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(1), 107–113. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2009.06.022.
Baumeister, R. F., DeWall, C. N., Ciarocco, N. J., & Twenge, J. M. (2005). Social exclusion impairs self-regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(4), 589–604.
Beekman, J. B., Stock, M. L., & Marcus, T. (2015). Need to belong, not rejection sensitivity, moderates cortisol response, self-reported stress, and negative affect following social exclusion. The Journal of Social Psychology, 156(2), 131–138. doi:10.1080/00224545.2015.1071767.
Bernstein, M. J., & Claypool, H. M. (2012). Not all social exclusions are created equal: emotional distress following social exclusion is moderated by exclusion paradigm. Social Influence, 7(2), 113–130. doi:10.1080/15534510.2012.664326.
Blackhart, G. C., Eckel, L. a., & Tice, D. M. (2007). Salivary cortisol in response to acute social rejection and acceptance by peers. Biological Psychology, 75(3), 267–276. doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2007.03.005.
Blackhart, G. C., Nelson, B. C., Knowles, M. L., & Baumeister, R. F. (2009). Rejection elicits emotional reactions but neither causes immediate distress nor lowers self-esteem: a meta-analytic review of 192 studies on social exclusion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13(4), 269–309. doi:10.1177/1088868309346065.
Bolling, D. Z., Pitskel, N. B., Deen, B., Crowley, M. J., McPartland, J. C., Mayes, L. C., et al. (2011). Dissociable brain mechanisms for processing social exclusion and rule violation. NeuroImage, 54(3), 2462–2471. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.10.049.
Cacioppo, S., Frum, C., Asp, E., Weiss, R. M., Lewis, J. W., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2013). A quantitative meta-analysis of functional imaging studies of social rejection. Scientific Reports, 3, 2027. doi:10.1038/srep02027.
Chiong, W., Wilson, S. M., D’Esposito, M., Kayser, A. S., Grossman, S. N., Poorzand, P., et al. (2013). The salience network causally influences default mode network activity during moral reasoning. Brain, 136(6), 1929–1941. doi:10.1093/brain/awt066.
Chow, R. M., Tiedens, L. Z., & Govan, C. L. (2008). Excluded emotions: the role of anger in antisocial responses to ostracism. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(3), 896–903. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2007.09.004.
Dedovic, K., Renwick, R., Mahani, N. K., Engert, V., Lupien, S. J., & Pruessner, J. C. (2005). The Montreal imaging stress task: using functional imaging to investigate the effects of perceiving and processing psychosocial stress in the human brain. Journal of Psychiatry & Neuroscience: JPN, 30(5), 319–325.
Dedovic, K., Duchesne, A., Engert, V., Lue, S. D., Andrews, J., Efanov, S. I., et al. (2014). Psychological, endocrine and neural responses to social evaluation in subclinical depression. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9(10), 1632–1644. doi:10.1093/scan/nst151.
DeWall, C. N., Masten, C. L., Powell, C., Combs, D., Schurtz, D. R., & Eisenberger, N. I. (2012). Do neural responses to rejection depend on attachment style? An fMRI study. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 7(2), 184–192. doi:10.1093/scan/nsq107.
Dickerson, S. S., & Kemeny, M. E. (2004). Acute stressors and cortisol responses: a theoretical integration and synthesis of laboratory research. Psychological Bulletin, 130(3), 355–91. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.130.3.355.
Eisenberger, N. I., & Lieberman, M. D. (2004). Why rejection hurts: a common neural alarm system for physical and social pain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(7), 294–300. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2004.05.010.
Eisenberger, N. I., Lieberman, M. D., & Williams, K. D. (2003). Does rejection hurt? An FMRI study of social exclusion. Science (New York, N.Y.), 302(5643), 290–292. doi:10.1126/science.1089134.
Ford, M. B., & Collins, N. L. (2010). Self-esteem moderates neuroendocrine and psychological responses to interpersonal rejection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(3), 405–419.
Goldin, P. R., McRae, K., Ramel, W., & Gross, J. J. (2008). The neural bases of emotion regulation: reappraisal and suppression of negative emotion. Biological Psychiatry, 63(6), 577–586. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2007.05.031.
Goodwin, S. A., Williams, K. D., & Carter-Sowell, A. R. (2010). The psychological sting of stigma: the costs of attributing ostracism to racism. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(4), 612–618. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2010.02.002.
Gradin, V. B., Waiter, G., Kumar, P., Stickle, C., Milders, M., Matthews, K., et al. (2012). Abnormal neural responses to social exclusion in schizophrenia. PloS One, 7(8), e42608. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0042608.
Gruenewald, T. L., Dickerson, S. S., & Kemeny, M. E. (2007). A social function for self-conscious emotions: The social self preservation theory. New York.
Hartgerink, C. H. J., van Beest, I., Wicherts, J. M., & Williams, K. D. (2015). The ordinal effects of ostracism: a meta-analysis of 120 Cyberball studies. PloS One, 10(5), e0127002. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0127002.
Karremans, J. C., Heslenfeld, D. J., van Dillen, L. F., & Van Lange, P. A. M. (2011). Secure attachment partners attenuate neural responses to social exclusion: an fMRI investigation. International Journal of Psychophysiology: Official Journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology, 81(1), 44–50. doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.04.003.
Kawamoto, T., Onoda, K., Nakashima, K., Nittono, H., Yamaguchi, S., & Ura, M. (2012). Is dorsal anterior cingulate cortex activation in response to social exclusion due to expectancy violation? An fMRI study. Frontiers in Evolutionary Neuroscience, 4(July), 11. doi:10.3389/fnevo.2012.00011.
Kawamoto, T., Ura, M., & Nittono, H. (2015). Intrapersonal and interpersonal processes of social exclusion. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 9, 62. doi:10.3389/fnins.2015.00062.
Kirschbaum, C., Pirke, K.-M., & Hellhammer, D. H. (1993). The’Trier social Sress Test' - a tool for investigating psychobiological stress responses in a laboratory setting. Neurobiology, 28, 76–81.
Kogler, L., Mueller, V. I., Chang, A., Eickhoff, S. B., Fox, P. T., Gur, R. C., et al. (2015). Psychosocial versus physiological stress – meta-analyses on deactivations and activations of the neural correlates of stress reactions. NeuroImage, 119, 235–251. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.06.059.
Kohn, N., Eickhoff, S. B., Scheller, M., Laird, A. R., Fox, P. T., & Habel, U. (2014). Neural network of cognitive emotion regulation - an ALE meta-analysis and MACM analysis. NeuroImage, 87, 345–355. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.11.001.
Kross, E., Berman, M. G., Mischel, W., Smith, E. E., & Wager, T. D. (2011). Social rejection shares somatosensory representations with physical pain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108(15), 6270–6275. doi:10.1073/pnas.1102693108.
Lehrl, S., Triebig, G., & Fischer, B. (1995). Multiple choice vocabulary test MWT as a valid and short test to estimate premorbid intelligence. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica, 91(5), 335–345. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0404.1995.tb07018.x.
Masten, C. L., Eisenberger, N. I., Borofsky, L. a., Pfeifer, J. H., McNealy, K., Mazziotta, J. C., et al. (2009). Neural correlates of social exclusion during adolescence: understanding the distress of peer rejection. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 4(2), 143–157. doi:10.1093/scan/nsp007.
Masten, C. L., Morelli, S. A., & Eisenberger, N. I. (2011a). An fMRI investigation of empathy for “social pain” and subsequent prosocial behavior. NeuroImage, 55(1), 381–388. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.11.060.
Masten, C. L., Telzer, E. H., & Eisenberger, N. I. (2011b). An FMRI investigation of attributing negative social treatment to racial discrimination. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(5), 1042–1051. doi:10.1162/jocn.2010.21520.
Moor, B. G., Güroğlu, B., Op de Macks, Z. A., Rombouts, S. a R. B., Van der Molen, M. W., & Crone, E. A. (2012). Social exclusion and punishment of excluders: neural correlates and developmental trajectories. NeuroImage, 59(1), 708–717. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.07.028.
Nepon, T., Flett, G. L., Hewitt, P. L., & Molnar, D. S. (2011). Perfectionism, negative social feedback, and interpersonal rumination in depression and social anxiety. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 43(4), 297–308.
Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9(1), 97–113. doi:10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4.
Onoda, K., Okamoto, Y., Nakashima, K., Nittono, H., Ura, M., & Yamawaki, S. (2009). Decreased ventral anterior cingulate cortex activity is associated with reduced social pain during emotional support. Social Neuroscience, 4(5), 443–454. doi:10.1080/17470910902955884.
Reitan, R. M. (1956). Trail making test. Manual for administration, scoring, and interpretation. Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
Rotge, J.-Y., Lemogne, C., Hinfray, S., Huguet, P., Grynszpan, O., Tartour, E., et al. (2014). A meta-analysis of the anterior cingulate contribution to social pain. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 10(1), 19–27. doi:10.1093/scan/nsu110.
Schurz, M., Radua, J., Aichhorn, M., Richlan, F., & Perner, J. (2014). Fractionating theory of mind: a meta-analysis of functional brain imaging studies. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 42, 9–34. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.01.009.
Sebastian, C. L., Tan, G. C. Y., Roiser, J. P., Viding, E., Dumontheil, I., & Blakemore, S.-J. (2011). Developmental influences on the neural bases of responses to social rejection: implications of social neuroscience for education. NeuroImage, 57(3), 686–694. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.09.063.
Seeley, W. W., Menon, V., Schatzberg, A. F., Keller, J., Glover, G. H., Kenna, H., et al. (2007). Dissociable intrinsic connectivity networks for salience processing and executive control. The Journal of Neuroscience : The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 27(9), 2349–2356. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5587-06.2007.
Seidel, E. M., Silani, G., Metzler, H., Thaler, H., Lamm, C., Gur, R. C., et al. (2013). The impact of social exclusion vs. inclusion on subjective and hormonal reactions in females and males. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 38(12), 2925–2932. doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2013.07.021.
Smith, A., & Williams, K. D. (2004). R U there? Ostracism by cell phone text messages. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 8(4), 291–301.
Somerville, L. H., Heatherton, T. F., & Kelley, W. M. (2006). Anterior cingulate cortex responds differentially to expectancy violation and social rejection. Nature Neuroscience, 9(8), 1007–1008. doi:10.1038/nn1728.
Stroud, L. R., Salovey, P., & Epel, E. S. (2002). Sex differences in stress responses: social rejection versus achievement stress. Biological Psychiatry, 52(4), 318–327. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12208639
Taylor, K. S., Seminowicz, D. A., & Davis, K. D. (2009). Two systems of resting state connectivity between the insula and cingulate cortex. Human Brain Mapping, 30(9), 2731–2745. doi:10.1002/hbm.20705.
Tossani, E. (2013). The concept of mental pain. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 82(2), 67–73 http://doi.org/10.1159/000343003.
Vogt, B. A. (2005). Pain and emotion interactions in subregions of the cingulate gyrus. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience, 6(7), 533–544. doi:10.1038/nrn1704.
Von Aster, M., Neubauer, A. C., & Horn, R. (2006). Hamburg-Wechsler-Intelligenz-test für Erwachsene III. Frankfurt.
Will, G.-J., van Lier, P. A. C., Crone, E. A., & Güroğlu, B. (2016). Chronic childhood peer rejection is associated with heightened neural responses to social exclusion during adolescence. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 44(1), 43–55. doi:10.1007/s10802-015-9983-0.
Williams, K. D. (2007a). Ostracism. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 425–452. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085641.
Williams, K. D. (2007b). Ostracism: the kiss of social death. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 1(1), 236–247. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00004.x.
Williams, K. D., & Nida, S. A. (2011). Ostracism: consequences and coping. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(2), 71–75. doi:10.1177/0963721411402480.
Williams, K. D., Cheung, C. K. T., & Choi, W. (2000). Cyberostracism: effects of being ignored over the internet. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 748–762. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.79.5.748.
Wirth, J. H., & Williams, K. D. (2009). `They Don’t like our kind': consequences of being ostracized while possessing a group membership. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 12(1), 111–127. doi:10.1177/1368430208098780.
Wudarczyk, O. A., Kohn, N., Bergs, R., Gur, R. E., Turetsky, B., Schneider, F., et al. (2015). Chemosensory anxiety cues moderate the experience of social exclusion - an fMRI investigation with Cyberball. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1475. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01475.
Zadro, L., Williams, K. D., & Richardson, R. (2004). How low can you go? Ostracism by a computer is sufficient to lower self-reported levels of belonging, control, self-esteem, and meaningful existence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40(4), 560–567 http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2003.11.006.
Zöller, C., Maroof, P., Weik, U., & Deinzer, R. (2010). No effect of social exclusion on salivary cortisol secretion in women in a randomized controlled study. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 35(9), 1294–1298. doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2010.02.019.
Zwolinski, J. (2012). Psychological and neuroendocrine reactivity to ostracism. Aggressive Behavior, 38(2), 108–125. doi:10.1002/ab.21411.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the State of North Rhine-Westphalia (NRW, Germany), the European Union through the ‘NRW Ziel2 Program’ as a part of the European Fund for Regional Development and by the German Research Foundation (DFG, IRTG 1328). The authors thank Andre Schueppen, from the Brain Imaging Facility of the Interdisciplinary Centre for Clinical Research at the RWTH Aachen University and the radiographers Cordula Kemper and Maria Peters, for their assistance with data acquisition. Furthermore, the authors thank Monica Bell and Katharina Görlich for their assistance in editing the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Online Resource 1
(DOC 35 kb)
Online Resource 2
(DOCX 13 kb)
Online Resource 3
(DOCX 22 kb)
Online Resource 4
Fig. 3 Significant clusters for the contrast of exclusion > inclusion (Ex > IN) are indicated in red (left part) and significant clusters for the contrast of performance context > free game context (PG > FG) are indicated in yellow (right part). A voxel level threshold of p < .05 FWE corrected was used for all clusters. (GIF 38 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wagels, L., Bergs, R., Clemens, B. et al. Contextual exclusion processing: an fMRI study of rejection in a performance-related context. Brain Imaging and Behavior 11, 874–886 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11682-016-9561-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11682-016-9561-2