Abstract
The ability to weld high-strength aluminum to high-strength steel is highly desired for vehicle lightweighting but difficult to attain by conventional means. In this work, vaporizing foil actuator welding was used to successfully weld four Al/Fe combinations consisting of high-strength alloys: AA5052-H32, AA6111-T4, DP980, and 22MnB5. Flyer velocities up to 727 m/s were reached using 10 kJ input energy. In lap-shear testing, samples primarily failed in base aluminum near the aluminum’s native strength, showing that the welds were stronger than a base metal and that the base metal was not significantly weakened by the welding process. A particularly strong weld area was studied by transmission electron microscopy to shed light on the microstructural features of strong impact welds. It was found to be characterized by a continuously bonded, fully crystalline interface, extremely fine (nanoscale) grains, mesoscopic as well as microscopic wavy features, and lack of large continuous intermetallic compounds.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
William J. Joost: JOM, 2012, vol. 64, pp. 1032-1038
Ranfeng Qiu, Chihiro Iwamoto, and Shinobu Satonaka: J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2009, vol. 209, pp. 4186–93.
R.Y. Hwang and C.P. Chou: Scripta Mater., 1998, vol. 38, pp. 215–21.
Simon Benson, Jonathan Downes, and Robert S. Dow: Thin-Walled Struct., 2013, vol. 70, pp. 19–32.
Y. Abe, T. Kato, and K. Mori: J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2006, vol. 177, pp. 417–21.
T.A. Barnes and I.R. Pashby: J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2000, vol. 99, pp. 72–79.
Paul Briskham, Nicholas Blundell, Li Han, Richard Hewitt, Ken Young, and Douglas Boomer: Sae Sp, 2006, vol. 2034, p. 105.
Z. Shen, Y. Chen, M. Haghshenas, and A.P. Gerlich: Eng. Sci. Technol., Int. J., 2015, vol. 18, pp. 8–15.
S. Fukada, R. Ohashi, M. Fujimoto, and H. Okada: Refill Friction Stir Spot Welding of Dissimilar Materials Consisting of A6061 and Hot Dip Zinc-Coated Steel Sheets, Woodhead Publishing Limited, Cambridge, 2013.
A. Vivek, S.R. Hansen, B.C. Liu, and Glenn S. Daehn: J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2013, vol. 213, pp. 2304–11.
Mustafa Acarer and Bilge Demir: Mater. Lett., 2008, vol. 62, pp. 4158–60.
Arun Prasath Manogaran, Prabu Manoharan, Didier Priem, Surendar Marya, and Guillaume Racineux: J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2014, vol. 214, pp. 1236–44.
G.R. Abrahamson: J. Appl. Mech., 1961. 28:519-528
N. Mårtensson and J. Schweitz: Metall. Trans. A, 1985, vol. 16A, pp. 841–52.
B. Crossland, A.S. Bahrani, and T.J. Black: Proc. R. Soc. London. Ser. A: Math. Phys. Sci., 1967, pp. 123–36.
Haiyang Lei, Yongbing Li, Blair E. Carlson, and Zhongqin Lin: J. Manuf. Sci. Eng., 2015, vol. 137, p. 51028.
A. Szecket: J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A, 1985, vol. 3, p. 2588.
O.T. Strand, D.R. Goosman, C. Martinez, T.L. Whitworth, and W.W. Kuhlow: Rev. Sci. Instrum., 2006, vol. 77, p. 83108.
S.R. Hansen, A. Vivek, and G.S. Daehn: Proc. Int. Conf. High Speed Form, 2014.
Jason R. Johnson, Geoff Taber, Anupam Vivek, Yuan Zhang, Scott Golowin, Kristin Banik, Gregg K. Fenton, and Glenn S. Daehn: Steel Res. Int., 2009, vol. 80, pp. 359–65.
Patrick W. Trimby: Ultramicroscopy, 2012, vol. 120, pp. 16–24.
A. Vivek, B. Liu, D. Sakkinen, M. Harris, and G. Daehn: SAE Technical Paper, 2015, pp. 2–6.
A.K. Lakshminarayanan, V. Balasubramanian, and K. Elangovan: Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2009, vol. 40, pp. 286–96.
Jérôme Fontane, Laurent Joly, and Jean N. Reinaud: Phys. Fluids, 2008, vol. 20, p. 91109.
Zhisong Fan, Haiping Yu, and Chunfeng Li: Scripta Mater., 2016, vol. 110, pp. 14–18.
J Li, Q Yu, Z Zhang, W Xu, X Sun: Appl. Phys. Lett. 2016, vol. 108, pp. 201606.
M. Presley: Ph.D. Dissertation, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 2016.
J.L. Brimhall, H.E. Kissinger, and L.A. Charlot: Radiat. Eff., 1983, vol. 77, pp. 273–93.
Taku Sakai, Andrey Belyakov, Rustam Kaibyshev, Hiromi Miura, and John J. Jonas: Progr. Mater. Sci., 2014, vol. 60, pp. 130–207.
L.E. Murr, G. Liu, and J.C. McClure: J. Mater. Sci. Lett., 1997, vol. 16, pp. 1801–03.
Acknowledgments
This material is based upon work supported by the Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), under Award No. DE-EE0006451. Special thanks go to Honda Motor Company for supplying the DP980 and 22MnB5 used in this work. The TEM work was conducted in the Center for Accelerated Maturation of Materials (CAMM) at the OSU Center for Advanced Microscopy and Analysis (CEMAS).
Disclaimer
Neither the U.S. Government, nor any of its employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of any information, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its manufacture or use would not infringe privately owned rights. Any reference to a commercial product, process, or service does not constitute an endorsement or favoring by the U.S. Government. The views and opinions of the authors stated do not necessarily reflect those of the U.S. Government.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Manuscript submitted April 18, 2017.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, B., Vivek, A., Presley, M. et al. Dissimilar Impact Welding of 6111-T4, 5052-H32 Aluminum Alloys to 22MnB5, DP980 Steels and the Structure–Property Relationship of a Strongly Bonded Interface. Metall Mater Trans A 49, 899–907 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-017-4429-7
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-017-4429-7