Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of cement on the stabilization of loess

  • Published:
Journal of Mountain Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Considering the potential use of cementstabilized loess (CSL) as a construction material for structures that are subjected to frequent loess landslides, this paper explores the stabilization and improvement of geotechnical characteristics of loess achieved by the addition of 0%-9% cement by dry weight. Laboratory evaluations investigated the consistency limits, compaction, compressibility, California bearing ratio (CBR), direct shear strength, and unconfined compression strength (UCS) of CSL for different curing stages. A durability index was quantified to estimate the influence of wetting-drying (w-d) cycles on CSL strength, and an optimum cement dosage was also identified. The results reveal that the cohesion of CSL is substantially more sensitive to structure than its friction angle and that cohesion is responsible for shear strength increase after remoulding. The cement proportions have an effective role in the enhancement of compressibility. The development of UCS can be categorized into the early stage (<14 days) and the later stage (>14 days). The increase in strength primarily occurred in the first 14 days. The w-d cycles have a significant influence on the decrease in compression strength. The CBR value increases with increments of additional proportions and compaction times. The relationships of UCS versus the compressibility modulus and UCS versus CBR are established to facilitate the mix design for strength. A rational predictive exponential equation is proposed to predict the durability index for different w-d cycles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Liu TS (2009) Loess and arid environment. Anhui Science & Technology Publishing House, Hefei, 58–90 (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dijkstra TA, Wasowski J, Winter MG, et al. (2014) Introduction to geohazards of Central China. Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology 47(3): 195–199. https://doi.org/10.1144/qjegh2014-054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang F, Chen W, Liu G, et al. (2012) Relationships between landslide types and topographic attributes in a loess catchment, China. Journal of Mountain Science 9(6): 742–751. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-012-2377-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan ZX, Wang LM (2009) Collapsibility and seismic settlement of loess. Engineering Geology 105(1): 119–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2008.12.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang F, Wang G, Kamai T, et al. (2013) Undrained shear behavior of loess saturated with different concentrations of sodium chloride solution. Engineering Geology 155: 69–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2012.12.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li P, Qian H, Wu J (2014) Environment: Accelerate research on land creation. Nature 510(7503): 29–31. https://doi.org/ 10.1038/5100 29a

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wen BP, Yan YJ (2014) Influence of structure on shear characteristics of the unsaturated loess in Lanzhou, China. Engineering Geology 168: 46–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. enggeo.2013. 10.023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dijkstra TA, Rogers CDF, Smalley IJ, et al. (1994) The loess of north-central China: geotechnical properties and their relation to slope stability. Engineering Geology 36(3–4): 153–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-7952(94)90001-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Picarelli L (2010) Discussion on “A rapid loess flowslide triggered by irrigation in China” by D. Zhang, G. Wang, C. Luo, J. Chen, and Y. Zhou. Landslides 7(2): 203–205. https://doi.org/10. 1007/s10346-010-0196-x

    Google Scholar 

  • Seco A, Ramírez F, Miqueleiz L, et al. (2011) Stabilization of expansive soils for use in construction. Applied Clay Science 51(3): 348–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2010.12.027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Sante M, Fratalocchi E, Mazzieri F, et al. (2014) Time of reactions in a lime treated clayey soil and influence of curing conditions on its microstructure and behaviour. Applied Clay Science 99: 100–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2014.06. 018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Modarres A, Nosoudy YM (2015) Clay stabilization using coal waste and lime-Technical and environmental impacts. Applied clay science 116: 281–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2015. 03.026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim YT, Do TH (2012) Effect of bottom ash particle size on strength development in composite geomaterial. Engineering Geology 139: 85–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2012.04. 012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamruzzaman AH, Chew SH, Lee FH (2009) Structuration and destructuration behavior of cement-treated Singapore marine clay. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 135(4): 573–589. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE) 1090-0241(2009)135:4(573)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiu CF, Zhu W, Zhang CL (2009) Yielding and shear behaviour of cement-treated dredged materials. Engineering Geology 103(1): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2008.07.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rabbi ATMZ, Kuwano J, Deng J, et al. (2011) Effect of curing stress and period on the mechanical properties of cementmixed sand. Soils and Foundations 51(4): 651–661. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.51.651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seng S, Tanaka H (2011) Properties of cement-treated soils during initial curing stages. Soils and Foundations 51(5): 775–784. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.51.775

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horpibulsuk S, Liu MD, Liyanapathirana DS, et al. (2010) Behaviour of cemented clay simulated via the theoretical framework of the Structured Cam Clay model. Computers and Geotechnics 37(1): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo. 2009.06.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horpibulsk S, Rachan R, Suddeepong A, et al. (2011) Strength development in cement admixed Bangkok clay: laboratory and field investigations. Soils and Foundations 51(2): 239–251. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.51.239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sasanian S, Newson TA (2014) Basic parameters governing the behaviour of cement-treated clays. Soils and Foundations 54(2): 209–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2014.02.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taheri A, Sasaki Y, Tatsuoka F, et al. (2012) Strength and deformation characteristics of cement-mixed gravelly soil in multiple-step triaxial compression. Soils and Foundations 52(1): 126–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2012.01.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiao H, Lee FH, Chin KG (2014) Yielding of cement-treated marine clay. Soils and Foundations 54(3): 488–501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2014.04.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anagnostopoulos CA (2015) Strength properties of an epoxy resin and cement-stabilized silty clay soil. Applied Clay Science 114: 517–529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2015. 07.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metelková Z, Boháč J, Přikryl R, et al. (2012) Maturation of loess treated with variable lime admixture: Pore space textural evolution and related phase changes. Applied Clay Science 61: 37–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2012.03.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pei X, Zhang F, Wu W, et al. (2015) Physicochemical and index properties of loess stabilized with lime and fly ash piles. Applied Clay Science 114: 77–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. clay.2015.05.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sukmak P, Horpibulsuk S, Shen SL, et al. (2013) Factors influencing strength development in clay-fly ash geopolymer. Construction and Building Materials 47: 1125–1136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.05.104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamei T, Ahmed A, Ugai K (2013) Durability of soft clay soil stabilized with recycled Bassanite and furnace cement mixtures. Soils and Foundations 53(1): 155–165. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2012.12.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ASTM, D. 2487-98. (2011) Standard Practice for Classification of Soils for Engineering Purposes (Unified Soil Classification System). American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, 238–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • ASTM, D. 558-82 (1996) Standard test methods for moisturedensity relations of soil-cement mixtures. West Conshohocken, PA: American Society for Testing and Materials.

    Google Scholar 

  • ASTM, D. 4318-05 (2007) Standard test methods for liquid limit, plastic limit, and plasticity index of soils. Annual Book of ASTM Standards. Section 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • ASTM, D. 3080-90 (1994) Standard test method for direct shear test of soils under consolidated drained conditions. Annual Book of ASTM Standards, 4, 290–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • ASTM, D. 2435-96 (1996) Standard Test Method for One-Dimensional Consolidation Properties of Soils. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • ASTM, D. 2166 (2000) Standard test method for unconfined compressive strength of cohesive soil. Annual book of ASTM Standards, American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, 4,08.

    Google Scholar 

  • ASTM, D. 559-03. Standard Test Methods for Wetting and Drying Compacted Soil-Cement Mixtures. American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, USA.

  • ASTM D. 1883-14 (2014) Standard Test Method for California Bearing Ratio (CBR) of Laboratory-Compacted Soils. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sariosseiri F, Muhunthan B (2008) Geotechnical properties of Palouse loess modified with cement kiln dust and Portland cement. In GeoCongress 2008: Characterization, Monitoring, and Modeling of GeoSystems (pp. 92–99). https://doi.org/10.1061/40972(311)12

    Google Scholar 

  • Hossain KMA, Lachemi M, Easa S (2007) Stabilized soils for construction applications incorporating natural resources of Papua New Guinea. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 51(4): 711–731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2006.12. 003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guney Y, Sari D, Cetin M, et al. (2007) Impact of cyclic wetting–drying on swelling behavior of lime-stabilized soil. Building and Environment 42(2): 681–688. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.buildenv.2005.10.035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar A, Walia BS, Bajaj A (2007) Influence of fly ash, lime, and polyester fibers on compaction and strength properties of expansive soil. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering 19(3): 242–248. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2007)19: 3(242)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kasama K, Zen K, Iwataki K (2006) Undrained shear strength of cement-treated soils. Soils and Foundations 46(2): 221–232. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.46.221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • JTJ 034-278, (2000) Technical Specification for Construction of Highway Pavement Base. Ministry of Communications of PRC, Beijing. (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kampala A, Horpibulsuk S, Prongmanee N, et al. (2013) Influence of wet-dry cycles on compressive strength of calcium carbide residue–fly ash stabilized clay. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering 26(4): 633–643. https://doi.org/10.1061/ (ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000853

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oti JE, Kinuthia JM, Bai J (2009) Engineering properties of unfired clay masonry bricks. Engineering Geology 107(3): 130–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2009.05.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bin-Shafique S, Rahman K, Yaykiran M, et al. (2010) The longterm performance of two fly ash stabilized fine-grained soil subbases. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 54(10): 666–672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2009.11.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horpibulsuk S, Suddeepong A, Chinkulkijniwat A, et al. (2012) Strength and compressibility of light weight cemented clays. Applied Clay Science 69: 11–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.clay.2012. 08.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neramitkornburi A, Horpibulsuk S, Shen SL, et al. (2015) Engineering properties of lightweight cellular cemented clayfly ash material. Soils and Foundations 55(2): 471–483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2015.02.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Department of Transport (1994) Design manual for roads and bridges, vol. 7. Pavement design and maintenance. HMSO.

  • Kolias S, Kasselouri-Rigopoulou V, Karahalios A (2005) Stabilisation of clayey soils with high calcium fly ash and cement. Cement and Concrete Composites 27(2): 301–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2004.02.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study has been financially supported by the National Basic Research Program (973 Program) of China (Grant No. 2013CB733201), the Key Research Program of Frontier Sciences, CAS (Grant No. QYZDB-SSW-DQC010), the Sichuan science and technology plan project (Grant No. 2017JY0251), the CAS “Light of West China” Program (Grant No. Y6R2240240), and the Youth Fund of Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, CAS (Grant No. Y6K2090090). A special acknowledgement should be expressed to M.S. Fang Li-feng for her invaluable assistance in the performance of the tests in this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Li-jun Su.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, Cl., Jiang, Gl., Su, Lj. et al. Effect of cement on the stabilization of loess. J. Mt. Sci. 14, 2325–2336 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-017-4365-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-017-4365-4

Keywords

Navigation