Abstract
Kinh is the largest population in Vietnam. It belongs to Mon-Khmer linguistically, but there is no last word for its origin. There are three hypotheses for the homeland of Kinh. The formation of Kinh population is also hypothesized to have occurred by one of two different modes. One is demic diffusion of Mon-Khmer, the other is Daic population assimilated by Mon-Khmer. Population studies such as dermatoglyphics can be used to determine the relevant mode. Fingerprints, palm prints, and sole prints of 135 individuals from Kinh populations all over Vietnam were collected in this project. Principle component analysis and dendrogram analysis were done based on the dermatoglyphic data of populations from south China and Vietnam. Kinh Vietnamese was found to be quite close to Deang and Blang, which belong to the Mon-Khmer group, but are not closely related to the Daic populations. This study supports the demic diffusion mode of the formation of the Kinh population. The interaction with the Daic population was never a significant course in the formation of Kinh.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cummins H, Midlo C (1976) Fingerprints, palms and soles. Dover Publications Inc., New York
Ding M, Zhang HG, Huang ML (2001) Dermatoglyphics: dermatoplyphic parameters of 24 ethnic groups. Yunnan Science and Technology Press, Kunming
Gilligan SB, Borecki IB, Mathew S, Malhotra KC, Rao DC (1985) A family study of dermatoglyphic traits in India: a search for major gene effects on palmar pattern ridge counts. Am J Phys Anthropol 68(3):409–416
Gilligan SB, Borecki IB, Mathew S, Vijaykumar M, Malhotra KC, Rao DC (1987) A family study of dermatoglyphic traits in India: segregation analysis of accessory palmar triradii and the atd angle. Am J Phys Anthropol 74(1):117–123
Gregerson KJ, Thomas DD (1976) Vietnamese and ngã tones and Mon-Khmer-h finals. Mon-Khmer Studies 5:76–84
Grimes BF (2002) Ethnologue: Languages of the world, 14th edn. International Academic Bookstore, Dallas
Haudricourt AG (1954) De l’origine des tons en viêtnamien. J Asiat 242:69–82
Karnow S, Editors of LIFE (1962) Life world library Southeast Asia. Time Incorporated, New York, p 29
Lĭ H (2002) On dividing of Baiyue people’s hereditary frame. Study of Ethnics in Guangxi 70(4):26–31
Lĭ H, Lĭ X, Yang NN, Wen B, Hou JR, Huang XQ, Jin JZ, Jin L, Lu DR (2003) Origin of grass hmong as revealed by genetics and physical anthropology. Journal of Fudan University (Natural Science) 42(4):621–629
Liu YF, Lĭ H, Jin JZ, Jin L (2004) Exploration of dermatoglyphic statistics based on analysis of Leme Bai Nationality. J Genet Mol Biol 15:35–44
Meng WT (1983) Series studies on Viet history (Yue Shi Cong Kao). People’s Press, Beijing
ÐH (1992) Vietnamese phonology and graphemic borrowings from Chinese: the book of 3,000 characters revisited. Mon-Khmer Studies 20:163–182
Sanna E (1986) Dermatoglyphic distances and different linguistic groups in Sardinia. Int J Anthropol 1(1):81–86
Sengupta M, Karmakar B (2004) Mode of inheritance of finger dermatoglyphic traits among Vaidyas of West Bengal, India. Ann Hum Biol 31(5):526–540
Su B, Xiao CJ, Deka R, Seielstad MT, Kangwanpong D, Xiao J, Lu D, Underhill P, Cavalli-Sforza LL, Chakraborty R, Jin L (2000) Y chromosome haplotypes reveal prehistorical migrations to the Himalayas. Hum Genet 107:582–590
Tran DB, Wang LL, Lin WX, Chen JF, Xie XZ (2005) HLA-DQA1 genotyping by PCR2SSP technique in Jing nationality of Central Vietnam. Chinese J Immunol 21(3):198–204
Wu RK, Wu XZ, Zhang ZB (1984) Anthropometric methods (Renti Cheliang Fangfa). Science Press, Beijing
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank those teachers and students of Guangxi Medical University and Vietnam Hue Medical College for giving their dermatoglyphic data and staff of the Anatomy Department, Hue Medical College for helping in collecting samples.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lĭ, H., Pan, S., Donnelly, M. et al. Dermatoglyph Groups Kinh Vietnamese to Mon-Khmer. Intl Jnl Anthropology 21, 295–306 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11599-007-9033-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11599-007-9033-6