Abstract
We describe the benefits and challenges of engaging in public data mining methods and situate our discussion in the context of studies that we have conducted. Practical, methodological, and scholarly benefits include the ability to access large amounts of data, randomize data, conduct both quantitative and qualitative analyses, connect educational issues with broader issues of concern, identify subgroups/subpopulations of interest, and avoid many biases. Technical, methodological, professional, and ethical issues that arise by engaging in public data mining methods include the need for multifaceted expertise and rigor, focused research questions and determining meaning, and performative and contextual considerations of public data. As the scientific complexity facing research in instructional design, educational technology, and online learning is expanding, it is necessary to better prepare students and scholars in our field to engage with emerging research methodologies.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andersen, D. G., & Feamster, N. (2006). Challenges and opportunities in Internet data mining. Parallel Data Laboratory, Carnegie Mellon University, Research Report CMU-PDL-06-102. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/8105/56e5f248e93f56e2ede855662fde9fad454d.pdf
Baker, R. S., & Inventado, P. S. (2014). Educational data mining and learning analytics. In R. S. Baker & P. S. Inventado (Eds.), Learning analytics (pp. 61–75). New York: Springer.
Brownstein, J. S., Freifeld, C. C., Reis, B. Y., & Mandl, K. D. (2008). Surveillance Sans Frontieres: Internet-based emerging infectious disease intelligence and the HealthMap project. PLoS Medicine, 5(7), e151.
Carpenter, J., Kimmons, R., Short, C. R., Clements, K., & Staples, M. E. (under review). Crossing the professional-personal divide: Teachers using twitter as a platform for expression and sharing.
Colleoni, E., Rozza, A., & Arvidsson, A. (2014). Echo chamber or public sphere? Predicting political orientation and measuring political homophily in Twitter using big data. Journal of Communication, 64(2), 317–332.
Elm, M. S. (2008). How do various notions of privacy influence decisions in qualitative internet research? In A. N. Markham & N. K. Baym (Eds.), Internet inquiry: Conversations about method. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Ess, C., & Jones, S. (2002). Ethical decision-making and internet research: Recommendations from the AoIR ethics working committee. Retrieved from http://aoir.org/reports/ethics.pdf
Kimmons, R. (2014). Social networking sites, literacy, and the authentic identity problem. TechTrends, 58(2), 93–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-014-0740-y.
Kimmons, R. (2015). Open online system adoption in K-12 as a democratizing factor. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 30(2), 138–151.
Kimmons, R. (2017). Open to all? Nationwide evaluation of high-priority web accessibility considerations among higher education websites. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 29, 434–450.
Kimmons, R., & Veletsianos, G. (2014). The fragmented educator 2.0: Social networking sites, acceptable identity fragments, and the identity constellation. Computers & Education, 72, 292–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.12.001.
Kimmons, R., & Veletsianos, G. (2015). Teacher professionalization in the age of social networking sites. Learning, Media and Technology, 40(4), 480–501. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2014.933846.
Kimmons, R., & Veletsianos, G. (2016). Education scholars' evolving uses of Twitter as a conference backchannel and social commentary platform. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(3), 445–464. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12428.
Kimmons, R., McGuire, K., Stauffer, M., Jones, J. E., Gregson, M., & Austin, M. (2017a). Religious identity, expression, and civility in social media: Results of data mining Latter-day Saint Twitter accounts. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 56(3), 637–657.
Kimmons, R., Veletsianos, G., & Woodward, S. (2017b). Institutional uses of Twitter in U.S. higher education. Innovative Higher Education, 42(2), 97–111.
Krutka, D., Kimmons, R., Harding, T., & Harker, Z. (under review). Speaking out on twitter: Understanding teachers’ expressed sociopolitical sentiments to improve policy making.
Maloof, M. A. (2006). Machine learning and data mining for computer security: methods and applications. London: Springer Science & Business Media.
Markham, A., & Buchanan, E. (2012). Ethical decision-making and internet research: Recommendations from the AoIR ethics working committee (Version 2.0). Retrieved from http://aoir.org/reports/ethics2.pdf
Marwick, A. E., & Boyd, D. (2011). I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media & Society, 13(1), 114–133.
National Institutes of Health (2018). I am an investigator. Retrieved from https://humansubjects.nih.gov/walkthrough-investigator
Niwa, S., Doi, T., & Honiden, S. (2006). Web page recommender system based on folksonomy mining for itng ‘06 submissions. In Information Technology: New Generations, 2006. ITNG 2006. Third International Conference on (pp. 388-393). IEEE.
Paskevicius, M., Veletsianos, G., & Kimmons, R. (2018). Content is king: An analysis of how the Twitter discourse surrounding open education unfolded from 2009 to 2016. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(1), 116–137. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v19i1.3267
Romero-Hall, E., Kimmons, R., & Veletsianos, G. (2018). Social media use by instructional design departments. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 34(5), 86–98.
Rowe, I. (2015). Civility 2.0: A comparative analysis of incivility in online political discussion. Information, Communication & Society, 18(2), 121–138.
Selwyn, N. (2015). Data entry: towards the critical study of digital data and education. Learning, Media and Technology, 40(1), 64–82.
Sharf, B. F. (1998). Beyond netiquette the ethics of doing naturalistic discourse research on the internet. In S. Jones (Ed.), Doing internet research: Critical issues and methods for examining the Net. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Taylor, J., & Pagliari, C. (2017). Mining social media data: How are research sponsors and researchers addressing the ethical challenges? Research Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016117738559.
Veletsianos, G. (2017a). Toward a Generalizable Understanding of Twitter and Social Media Use Across MOOCs: Who Participates on MOOC Hashtags and In What Ways? Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 29(1), 65–80.
Veletsianos, G. (2017b). Three Cases of Hashtags Used as Learning and Professional Development Environments. TechTrends, 61(3), 284–292.
Veletsianos, G., & Kimmons, R. (2012). Networked Participatory Scholarship: Emergent Techno-Cultural Pressures Toward Open and Digital Scholarship in Online Networks. Computers & Education, 58(2), 766–774.
Veletsianos, G., & Kimmons, R. (2016). Scholars in an increasingly digital and open world: How do education professors and students use Twitter? The Internet and Higher Education, 30, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.02.002.
Veletsianos, G., Kimmons, R., Shaw, A. G., Pasquini, L., & Woodward, S. (2017). Selective openness, branding, broadcasting, and promotion: Twitter use in Canada's public universities. Educational Media International, 54(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2017.1324363.
Veletsianos, G., Kimmons, R., Larsen, R., Dousay, T., & Lowenthal, P. (in press). Public Comment Sentiment on Educational Videos: Understanding the Effects of Presenter Gender, Video Format, Threading, and Moderation on YouTube TED Talks. PLoS One.
Veletsianos, G., Kimmons, R., Belikov, O., Johnson, N. (under review). Scholars’ Temporal Participation on, Temporary Disengagement from, and Return to Twitter.
Wang, M., Madhyastha, T., Chan, N. H., Papadimitriou, S., & Faloutsos, C. (2002). Data mining meets performance evaluation: Fast algorithms for modeling bursty traffic. In Data Engineering, 2002. Proceedings. 18th International Conference on (pp. 507-516). IEEE.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical Approval
This article does not report on a study with human participants performed by any of the authors.
Conflict of Interest
Royce Kimmons declares that he has no conflict of interest. George Veletsianos declares that he has no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kimmons, R., Veletsianos, G. Public Internet Data Mining Methods in Instructional Design, Educational Technology, and Online Learning Research. TechTrends 62, 492–500 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-018-0307-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-018-0307-4