Abstract
The potential of augmented reality technologies (AR) for learning in a social and informal setting has been recognized, but little is yet known about the kinds of learning interactions it promotes and supports. In this paper, we describe initial findings from a study where an interactive, immersive, full-body simulation was deployed in a science center. Children complete a series of simulation tasks by making themselves mobile, and using their bodies to enact their understanding of a scientific system. Parents and siblings are able to support these activities by engaging the child in conversations about their actions and subsequent outcomes. Our analysis shows that parents primarily support the child’s learning by prompting her to reflect and plan, countering a child’s tendency to engage with the simulation in an unsystematic way. The analysis suggests that, unlike traditional learning technologies, these kinds of immersive, visible, and physical technology platforms are able to support productive forms of social interaction, creating a space for reflection and engagement with critical concepts that benefits processes for learning.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allen, S. (2002). Looking for learning in visitor talk: A methodological exploration. In G. Leinhardt, K. Crowley, & K. Knutson (Eds.), Learning conversations in museums (pp. 259–303). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Asai, K., Sugimoto, Y., & Billinghurst, M. (2010). Exhibition of lunar surface navigation system facilitating collaboration between children and parents in science museum. Proceedings of the 9th ACM SIGGRAPH Conference on Virtual Reality Continuum and Its Application in Industry, pp. 119–124.
Ash, D. (2003). Dialogic inquiry in life science conversations of family groups in a museum. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, pp. 138–162
Bell, P. (2002). Using argument map representations to make thinking visible for individuals and groups. In T. Koschmann, R. Hall, & N. Miyake (Eds.), Proceeding of the International Conference of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, pp. 449–485. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Benjamin, N., Haden, C. A., & Wilkerson, E. (2010). Enhancing building, conversation, and learning through caregiver - child interactions in a children’s museum. Developmental Psychology, 46, 502–515.
Billinghurst, M., & Dunser, A. (2012). Augmented reality in the classroom. Computer, 45(7), 56–63.
Blud, L. (1990). Social Interaction and Learning among Family Groups Visiting a Museum. Museum Management and Curatorship 9(1):43–51.
Crowley, K., Callanan, M., Jipson, J., Galco, J., Topping, K., & Shrager, J. (2001). Shared scientific thinking in everyday parent - child activity. Science Education 85(6), 712–732.
Dunleavy, M., Dede, C., & Mitchell, R. (2009). Affordances and limitations of immersive participatory augmented reality simulations for teaching and learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18:7–22.
Ellenbogen, K. (2000). Using museums: An ethnographic case study. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association annual meeting, New Orleans.
Falk, J.H. & L.D. Dierking (2000). Learning From Museums. Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira.
Fender, J. G., & Crowley, K. (2008). How parent explanation changes what children learn from everyday scientific thinking. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 28(3), 189–210.
Gleason, M. E., & Schauble, L. (2000). Parents’ assistance of their children’s scientific reasoning. Cognition and Instruction, 17(4), 343–378.
Heath, C., vom Lehn, D., & Osborne, J. (2005). Interaction and interactives: Collaboration and participation with computer-based exhibits. Public Understanding of Science, 14(1), 91–101.
Hughes, C. E., Smith, E., Stapleton, C. B., & Hughes, D. E. (2004). Augmenting museum experiences with mixed reality, Proceedings of KSCE 2004, St. Thomas, V.I., November 22–24.
Kavanagh, C. (2006). Learning about gravity. Astronomy Education Review, 5(2), 21–102.
Kirkley, S. E. & Kirkley, J. R. (2004). Creating next generation blended learning environments using mixed reality, video games, and simulation. TechTrends, 49(3), 42–89.
Klahr, D. (2000). Exploring science: The cognition and development of discovery processes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Klopfer, E., & Squire, K. (2008). Environmental Detectives—the development of an augmented reality platform for environmental simulations. Educational Technology Research and Development, 56(2), 203–228.
Kuhn, D. (1989). Children and adults as intuitive scientists. Psychological Review, 96, 674–689.
Laursen, D. (2012). Co-participation among school children around a computer-based exhibit. Social Studies of Science, 43(1), 97–117.
Lindgren, R. & Johnson-Glenberg, M. C. (in press). Emboldened by Embodiment: Six Precepts for Research on Embodied Learning and Mixed Reality, Educational Researcher.
McManus, P. (1989). Good companions: More on the social determination of learning-related behavior in a science museum. International Journal of Museum Management and Curatorship, 7, 37–44.
McManus, P. (1994). Families in museums. In Miks L. & Zavala A. (Eds.), Towards the museum of the future (pp. 81–118). London: Routledge.
Milgram, P., & Kishino, A. F. (1994). Taxonomy of mixed reality visual displays. IEICE Trans. Information and Systems, E77-D(12), 1321–1329.
Rogoff, B. (2003). The Cultural Nature of Human Development. New York: Oxford University Press.
Sandifer, C. (2003). Technological novelty and open- endedness: Two characteristics of interactive exhibits that contribute to the holding of visitor attention in a science museum. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(2), 121–137.
Suthers, D., & Hundhausen, C. (2003). An empirical study of the effects of representational guidance on collaborative learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12 (2), 183–219.
Szymanski, M., Aoki, P., Grinter, R., Hurst, A., Thornton, J., & Woodruff, A. (2008). Sotto Voce: Facilitating social learning in a historic house. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 17, 5–34.
Tare, M., French, J., Frazier, B.N., Diamond, J., Evans, E.M. (2011). Explanatory parent–child conversation predominates at an evolution exhibit. Science Education 95(4), 720–744.
Toth, E. E., Suthers, D. D., & Lesgold, A. M. (2002). “Mapping to know”: The effects of representational guidance and reflective assessment on scientific inquiry. Science Education, 86(2), 264–286.
Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in Society: The development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wu, H. K., Wen-Yu Lee, S., Chang, H. Y., & Liang, J. C. (2012). Current status, opportunities and challenges of augmented reality in education. Computers & Education, 62, 41–49.
Yoon S.A., Elinich K., Wang J., Steinmeier C., Tucker S. (2012). Using augmented reality and knowledge- building scaffolds to improve learning in a science museum - International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, vol. 7.
Zimmerman, C. (2000). The development of scientific reasoning skills. Developmental Review, 20, 99–149.
Zimmerman, H. T., Reeve, S., & Bell, P. (2010). Family sense-making practices in science center conversations. Science Education, 94(3), 478–505. doi:10.1002/ sce.20374
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tscholl, M., Lindgren, R. Empowering Digital Interactions with Real World Conversation. TECHTRENDS TECH TRENDS 58, 56–63 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-013-0721-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-013-0721-6